Studies argue that generalist CEOs are more valued by the market for executive labor and receive higher initial compensation. Challenging this prevailing assumption, we acknowledge the drawbacks of extensive career mobility and predict an inverted U-shape relationship between CEO generalist career experience and CEO initial compensation. Integrating the generalism and specialization views of human capital, we postulate that at an initial level, the acquisition of experience breadth from different firms and industries enables CEOs to broaden their knowledge base, obtain a variety of skills, and thus increase their labor market value and initial compensation. After a threshold, however, the accumulation of extensive levels of career generalism through frequent job hopping across firm and industry contexts gradually causes a lack of experience depth and insufficient career specialization, thereby triggering lower CEO market value and initial pay. Data from 197 CEO appointments in large, publicly traded firms support our predictions. Our results also show that the observed inverted U-shape relationship varies with factors nested at different layers of context, highlighting the contingent nature of this area of research.
AcemogluD.PischkeJ.-S.1999. The structure of wages and investment in general training. Journal of Political Economy, 107: 539-572.
2.
ArmstrongC. S.BarthM. E.JagolinzerA. D.RiedlE. J.2010. Market reaction to the adoption of IFRS in Europe. Accounting Review, 85: 31-61.
3.
AstebroT.ThompsonP.2011. Entrepreneurs, jacks of all trades or hobos?Research Policy, 40: 637-649.
4.
BaruchY.VardiY.2016. A fresh look at the dark side of contemporary careers: Toward a realistic discourse. British Journal of Management, 27: 355-372.
5.
BidwellM.WonS.BarbulascuR.MollickE.2015. I used to work for Goldman Sachs! How firms benefit from organizational status in the market for human capital. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1164-1173.
6.
BlauP.1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
7.
BohW. F.EvaristoR.OuderkirkA.2014. Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: A 3M story. Research Policy, 43: 349-366.
8.
BoivieS.GraffinS. D.GentryR.2016. Understanding the direction, magnitude, and joint effects of reputation when multiple actors’ reputations collide. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 188-206.
9.
BragawN. A.MisangyiV. F.2017. The value of CEO mobility: Contextual factors that shape the impact of prior CEO experience on market performance and CEO compensation. Human Resource Management, 56: 243-265.
10.
BriscoeJ. P.HallD. T.DeMuthR. L. F.2006. Protean and boundaryless careers: An empirical exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69: 30-47.
11.
BusenbarkJ. R.KrauseR.BoivieS.GraffinS. D.2016. Toward a configurational perspective on the CEO: A review and synthesis of the management literature. Journal of Management, 42: 234-268.
12.
BuylT.BooneC.HendriksW.MatthyssensP.2011. Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of CEO characteristics. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 151-177.
13.
CampbellB. A.CoffR.KryscynskiD.2012. Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Academy of Management Review, 37: 376-395.
14.
CannellaA. A.ParkJ.-H.LeeH.-U.2008. Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 768-784.
15.
CarpenterM. A.SandersW. G.GregersenH. B.2001. Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm-performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 493-511.
16.
CastaniasR. P.HelfatC. E.1991. Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management, 17: 155-171.
17.
ChenG.2015. Initial compensation of new CEOs hired in turnaround situations. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1895-1917.
18.
ChildJ.1974. Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance. Journal of Management Studies, 11: 175-189.
19.
ChungC.-N.LuoX. R.2013. Leadership succession and firm performance in an emerging economy: Successor origin, relational embeddedness, and legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 338-357.
20.
CollinsJ.2001. Good to great: Why some companies make the leap . . . and others don’t. New York: Harper Business.
21.
CombsJ. G.SkillM. S.2003. Managerialist and human capital explanations for key executive pay premiums: A contingency perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 63-73.
22.
ConyonM.HaasL.PeckS.SadlerG.ZhangZ.2019. Do compensation consultants drive CEO pay? Evidence from UK. British Journal of Management, 30: 10-29.
23.
ConyonM. J.MurphyK. J.2000. The prince and the pauper? CEO pay in the United States and United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 110: 640-671.
24.
ConyonM. J.PeckS. I.SadlerG. V.2001. Corporate tournaments and executive compensation: Evidence from the U.K. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 805-815.
25.
CrosslandC.HambrickD. C. 2011. Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 797-819.
26.
CrosslandC.ZyungJ.HillerN. J.HambrickD. C.2014. CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 652-674.
27.
CustódioC.FerreiraM. A.MatosP.2013. Generalists versus specialists: Lifetime work experience and chief executive officer pay. Journal of Financial Economics, 108: 471-492.
28.
CustódioC.FerreiraM. A.MatosP.2019. Do general managerial skills spur innovation?Management Science, 65: 459-476.
29.
DaneE.2010. Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35: 579-603.
30.
DattaD. K.GuthrieJ. P.RajagopalanN.2002. Different industries, different CEOs? A study of CEO career specialization. Human Resource Planning, 25: 14-25.
31.
DattaS.Iskandar-DattaM.2014. Upper-echelon executive human capital and compensation: Generalist vs specialist skills. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1853-1866.
32.
DawsonJ. F.2014. Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29: 1-19.
33.
DefillippiR. J.ArthurM. B.1994. The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15: 307-324.
DeversC. E.CannellaA. A.ReillyG. P.YoderM. E.2007. Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. Journal of Management, 33: 1016-1072.
37.
DragoniL.OhI.VankatwykP.TeslukP.2011. Developing executive leaders: The relative contribution of cognitive ability, personality, and the accumulation of work experience in predicting strategic thinking competency. Personnel Psychology, 64: 829-864.
38.
EckardtR.CrockerA.AhnY.FloydS.BoydB.HodgkinsonG.. . . StarbuckW. H.2018. Reflections on the micro-macro divide: Ideas from the trenches and moving forward. Strategic Organization, 17: 385-402.
FalatoA.LiD.MilbournT.2015. Which skills matter in the market for CEOs? Evidence from pay for CEO credentials. Management Science, 61: 2845-2869.
41.
FergusonJ. -P.HasanS.2013. Specialization and career dynamics: Evidence from the Indian administrative service. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 233-256.
42.
FinkelsteinS.BoydB. K.1998. How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 179-199.
43.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C.CannellaA. A.2009. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
FrydmanC.2019. Rising through the ranks: The evolution of the market for corporate executives, 1936-2003. Management Science, 65: 4951-5448.
45.
FrydmanC.JenterD.2010. CEO compensation. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2: 75-102.
46.
FrydmanC.SaksR. E.2010. Executive compensation: A new view from a long-term perspective, 1936-2005. Review of Financial Studies, 23: 2099-2138.
47.
FulmerI. S.2009. The elephant in the room: Labor market influences on CEO compensation. Personnel Psychology, 62: 659-695.
48.
GeletkanyczM. A.BoydB. K.FinkelsteinS.2001. The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: Implications for CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 889.
49.
GeorgakakisD.GreveP.RuigrokW.2017. Top management team faultlines and firm performance: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Leadership Quarterly, 28: 741-758.
50.
GeorgakakisD.HeydenM. L.OehmichenJ. D.EkanayakeU. I. in press. Four decades of CEO–TMT interface research: A review inspired by role theory. Leadership Quarterly. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101354
51.
GibbsJ. P.MartinW. T.1962. Urbanization, technology, and the division of labor: International patterns. American Sociological Review, 27: 667-677.
52.
GraffinS. D.HubbardT. D.ChristensenD. M.LeeE. Y.2020. The influence of CEO risk tolerance on initial pay packages. Strategic Management Journal, 41: 788-811.
53.
GreveP.BiemannT.RuigrokW.2015. Foreign executive appointments: A multilevel examination. Journal of World Business, 50: 674-686.
54.
HaansR. F. J.PietersC.HeZ.-L.2016. Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 1177-1195.
55.
HambrickD. C.FinkelsteinS.MooneyA. C.2005. Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30: 472-491.
56.
HambrickD. C.FukutomiG. D.1991. The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Academy of Management Review, 16: 719-742.
57.
HarrisD.HelfatC.1997. Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 895-920.
58.
HarrisonJ. S.ThurgoodG. R.BoivieS.PfarrerM. D.2019. Measuring CEO personality: Developing, validating, and testing a linguistic tool. Strategic Management Journal, 40: 1316-1330.
59.
HavemanH.1992. Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 48-75.
60.
HeckmanJ.1979. Sample specification bias as a selection error. Econometrica, 47: 153-162.
61.
HendersonA. D.FredricksonJ. W.1996. Information-processing demands as a determinant of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 575-606.
HodgkinsonG. P.HealeyM. P.2011. Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflection and reflexion in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1500-1516.
64.
HodgkinsonG. P.HealeyM. P.2018. The psychological foundations of strategic management: Beyond cold cognition. In OnesD. S.AndersonN.SinangilH. K.ViswesvaranC. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, 275-305. London: Sage doi: 10.4135/9781473914964.n14
65.
JudgeT. A.WatanabeS.1995. Is the past prologue? A test of Ghiselli’s hobo syndrome. Journal of Management, 21: 211-229.
66.
KacperczykA.YounkinP.2017. The paradox of breadth: The tension between experience and legitimacy in the transition to entrepreneurship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62: 731-764.
67.
KangS.-C.SnellS. A.2009. Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 65-92.
68.
KaraevliA.HallD. T. T.2006. How career variety promotes the adaptability of managers: A theoretical model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69: 359-373.
69.
KimS.1989. Labor specialization and the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 97: 692-705.
70.
KleinbaumA. M.2012. Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57: 407-452.
71.
KolevK.WisemanR. M.Gomez-MejiaL. R.2017. Do CEOs ever lose? Fairness perspective on the allocation of residuals between CEOs and shareholders. Journal of Management, 43: 610-637.
LawrenceP. R.LorschJ. W.1967. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 1-47.
74.
LazearE.2004. Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 94: 208-211.
75.
LindJ. T.MehlumH.2010. With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72: 109-118.
76.
LorschJ. W.MaciverE.1989. Pawns or potentates: Reality of America’s corporate boards. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
77.
LungeanuR.ZajacE. J.2019. Thinking broad and deep: Why some directors exert an outsized influence on strategic change. Organization Science, 30: 489-508.
78.
MackeyA.MolloyJ. C.MorrisS. S.2014. Scarce human capital in managerial labor markets. Journal of Management, 40: 399-421.
MerluzziJ.PhillipsD. J.2016. The specialist discount: Negative returns for MBAs with focused profiles in investment banking. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 87-124.
81.
MichelJ. G.HambrickD. C.1992. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 9-37.
82.
MillerD.MinichilliA.CorbettaG.2013. Is family leadership always beneficial?Strategic Management Journal, 34: 553-571.
83.
MishraD. R.2014. The dark side of CEO ability: CEO general managerial skills and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 29: 390-409.
84.
MunasingheL.SigmanK.2004. A hobo syndrome? Mobility, wages, and job turnover. Labour Economics, 11: 191.
85.
MurphyK. J.ZabojnikJ.2004. CEO pay and appointments: A market-based explanation for recent trends. American Economic Review, 94: 192-196.
86.
NadkarniS.ChenT.ChenJ.2016. The clock is ticking! Executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 1132-1153.
87.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G.1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
NorburnD.1989. The chief executive: A breed apart. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 1-15.
89.
PalmerT. B.WisemanR. M.1999. Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 1037-1062.
90.
PengM. W.SunS. L.MarkoczyL.2015. Human capital and CEO compensation during institutional transitions. Journal of Management Studies, 52: 117-147.
91.
PhillipsJ. M.GullyS. M.2015. Multilevel and strategic recruiting: Where have we been, where can we go from here?Journal of Management, 41: 1416-1445.
92.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA.2008. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
93.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
94.
SalasE.RosenM. A.DiazGranadosD.2010. Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations. Journal of Management, 36: 941-973.
95.
SasabuchiS.1980. A test of a multivariate normal mean with composite hypotheses determined by linear inequalities. Biometrika, 67: 429-439.
96.
SastryM. A.1997. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 237-275.
97.
SauerwaldS.van OosterhoutJ.van EssenM.PengM. W.2018. Proxy advisors and shareholder dissent: A cross-country comparative study. Journal of Management, 44: 3364-3394.
98.
SeoJ.GemacheD. L.DeversC.CarpenterM.2015. The role of CEO relative standing in acquisition behavior and CEO pay. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1877-1894.
99.
ShenW.CannellaA. A.Jr.2002. Power dynamics within top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1195-1206.
100.
ShinT.2016. Fair pay or power play? Pay equity, managerial power, and compensation adjustments for CEOs. Journal of Management, 42: 419-448.
101.
SimmonsR.BerriD. J.2009. Gains from specialization and free agency: The story from the Gridiron. Review of Industrial Organization, 34: 81-98.
102.
SmithM.WhiteM. C.1987. Strategy, CEO specialization, and succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 263-280.
103.
SullivanS. E.BaruchY.2009. Advances in career theory and research: A critical review and agenda for future exploration. Journal of Management, 35: 1542-1571.
104.
TallmanS.LiJ.1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 179-196.
105.
TangY.LiJ.YangH.2015. What I see, what I do: How executive hubris affects firm innovation. Journal of Management, 41: 1698-1723.
106.
TorresN.2016. Generalists get better job offers than specialists. Harvard Business Review, 94: 30-31.
107.
TuggleC. S.SirmonD. G.ReutzelC. R.2010. Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 946-968.
108.
TushmanM. L.NadlerD. A.1978. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3: 613-624.
109.
van EssenM.HeugensP. P.OttenJ.van OosterhoutJ. 2012. An institution-based view of executive compensation: A multilevel meta-analytic test. Journal of International Business Studies, 43: 396-423.
110.
van EssenM.OttenJ.Carberry, 2015. Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management, 41: 164-202.
111.
WowakA. J.HambrickD. C.HendersonA. D.2011. Do CEOs encounter within-tenure settling up? A multiperiod perspective on executive pay and dismissal. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 719-739.
112.
ZhangY.RajagopalanN.2004. When the known devil is better than the unknown god: An empirical study on the antecedents and consequences of relay successions. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 483-500.
113.
ZornM. L.ShropshireC.MartinJ. A.CombsJ. G.KetchenD. J.2017. Home alone: The effects of lone-insider boards on CEO pay, financial misconduct, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 2623-2646.
114.
ZuckermanE. W.KimT. Y.UkanwaK.RittmannJ.2003. Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. American Journal of Sociology, 108: 1018-1073.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
