The current study meta-analytically examined the gendered nature of lateral and upward influence attempts. Drawing from gender role theory, we investigated the extent to which the gender of the influence actor affected the use and effectiveness of influence behaviors. The role of a gendered environmental context was also examined. The results provided limited support of gender role theory such that men were more likely to use agentic influence tactics and women were more likely to receive personal advancement outcomes when they used communal influence tactics. Overall, the current work suggests that influence tactics may be gendered in nature such that there may be gender differences in the frequency of use and subsequent outcomes thereof. Recommendations for future research on influence include increased attention to the potentially gendered nature of influence behaviors as well as more explicit considerations of the impact of gender and gendered environment on influence effectiveness.
AckerJ.1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4: 139-158.
2.
AckerJ.2012. Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31: 214-224.
3.
AguinisH.AdamsS. K. R.1998. Social-role versus structural models of gender and influence use in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 23: 414-446.
4.
AhearnK. K.FerrisG. R.HochwarterW. A.DouglasC.AmmeterA. P.2004. Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30: 309-327.
AmanatullahE. T.MorrisM. W.2010. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98: 256-267.
7.
AndrewsM. C.KacmarK. M.HarrisK. J.2009. Got political skill? The impact of justice on the importance of political skill for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1427-1437.
8.
*BaronR. A.1986. Self-presentation in job interviews: when there can be too much of a good thing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16: 16-28.
9.
BarrickM. R.ShafferJ. A.DeGrassiS. W.2009. What you seemaynot be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1394-1411.
10.
BensonP. G.HornsbyJ. S.1988. The politics of pay: The use of influence tactics in job evaluation committees. Group & Organization Studies, 13: 208-224.
11.
BerdahlJ. L.2007. The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 425-437.
12.
BergerJ.WebsterM.RidgewayC. L.RosenholtzS.1986. Status cues, expectations, and behaviors. In LawlerE. (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Vol. 3: 1-22. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
13.
BolinoM. C.TurnleyW. H.1999. Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2: 187-206.
14.
BrovermanI.VogelS.BrovermanD.ClarkF.RosenkrantzP.1972. Sex-role stereotypes: A reappraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28: 59-78.
15.
BurkeM. J.DunlapW. P.2002. Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user’s guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5: 159-172.
16.
BurkeM. J.FinkelsteinL. M.DusigM. S.1999. On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 2: 49-68.
17.
BurkeM. J.LandisR.2003. Methodological and conceptual challenges in conducting meta-analyses. In MurphyK. (Ed.), Validity generalization: A critical review: 287-309. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
*ButtnerE. H.McEnallyM.1996. The interactive effect of influence tactic, applicant gender, and type of job on hiring recommendations. Sex Roles, 34: 581-591.
19.
CarliL. L.EaglyA. H.1999. Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. In PowellG. N. (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work: 203-222. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
CarliL. L.LaFleurS. J.LoeberC. C.1995. Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 1030-1041.
21.
CarothersB. J.AllenJ. B.1999. Relationships of employment status, gender role, insult, and gender with use of influence tactics. Sex Roles, 41: 375-387.
22.
CastroS. L.DouglasC.HochwarterW. A.FerrisG. R.FrinkD. D.2003. The effects of positive affect and gender on the influence tactics-job performance relationship. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10: 1-18.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R.1998. Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology: 151-192. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
25.
*DreherG. F.DoughertyT. W.WhitelyW.1989. Influence tactics and salary attainment: A gender-specific analysis. Sex Roles, 20: 535-550.
26.
*DubrinA. J.1989. Sex differences in endorsement of influence tactics and political behavior tendencies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4: 3-14.
27.
DubrinA. J.1991. Sex and gender differences in tactics of influence. Psychological Reports, 68: 635-646.
28.
DunlapW. P.BurkeM. J.Smith-CroweK.2003. Accurate tests of statistical significance for rWG and average deviation interrater agreement indexes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 356-362.
29.
EaglyA. H.1987. Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C.van EngenM. L.2003. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129: 569-591.
31.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J.2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109: 573-598.
32.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J.MakhijaniM. G.1995. Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 125-145.
33.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.1982. Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43: 915-928.
34.
ElyR. J.1995. The power of demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 589-635.
35.
FalbeC. M.YuklG.1992. Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 638-652.
36.
*FarmerS. M.MaslynJ. M.FedorD. B.GoodmanJ. S.1997. Putting upward influence strategies in context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 17-42.
37.
FurstS. A.CableD. M.2008. Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 453-462.
38.
*GilmoreD. C.FerrisG. R.1989. The effects of applicant impression management tactics on interviewer judgments. Journal of Management, 15: 557-562.
39.
GuadagnoR. E.CialdiniR. B.2007. Gender differences in impression management in organizations: A qualitative review. Sex Roles, 56: 483-494.
40.
GutekB. A.MoraschB.1982. Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 38: 55-74.
41.
HeilmanM. E.2001. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57: 657-674.
42.
HeilmanM. E. in press. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior.
43.
HeilmanM. E.ChenJ. J.2005. Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizen behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 331-341.
44.
HeilmanM. E.OkimotoT. G.2007. Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied community deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 81-92.
45.
HeilmanM. E.WallenA. S.2010. Wimpy and undeserving of respect: Penalties for men’s gender-inconsistent success. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46: 664-667.
46.
HelfatC.HarrisD.WolfsonP.2007. The pipeline to the top: Women and men in the top executive ranks of U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20: 42-64.
47.
*HigginsC. A.JudgeT. A.2004. The effect of applicant influence tactics on recruiter perceptions of fit and hiring recommendations: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 622-632.
48.
HigginsC. A.JudgeT. A.FerrisG. R.2003. Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24: 89-106.
49.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L.2004. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
InstoneD.MajorB.BunkerB. B.1983. Gender, self confidence, and social influence strategies: An organizational simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44: 322-333.
51.
JonesE. E.PittmanT. S.1982. Toward a general theory of strategic self presentation. In SulsJ. (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self: 231-262. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
*JudgeT. A.BretzR. D.1994. Political influence behavior and career success. Journal of Management, 20: 43-65.
53.
KanterR. M.1977. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82: 965-990.
54.
KipnisD.SchmidtS. M.1985. The language of persuasion. Hard, soft or rational: Our choice depends on power expectations and what we hope to accomplish. Psychology Today, 4: 40-46.
55.
KipnisD.SchmidtS. M.1988. Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 528-542.
56.
KipnisD.SchmidtS. M.Swaffin-SmithC.WilkinsonI.1984. Patterns of managerial influence: Shotgun managers, tacticians, and bystanders. Organizational Dynamics, 12: 58-67.
57.
KipnisD.SchmidtS. M.WilkinsonI.1980. Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 440-452.
58.
KrayL. J.ThompsonL.2005. Negotiation performance: An examination of theory and research. In StawB.Kramer’sR. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays: 103-182. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
59.
KulikC. T.OlekalnsM.2012. Negotiating the gender divide: Lessons from the negotiation and organizational behavior literatures. Journal of Management, 38: 1387-1415.
60.
LamudeK. G.1993. Supervisors’ upward influence tactics in same-sex and cross-sex dyads. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77: 1067-1070.
MintzbergH.1983. Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
63.
O’NeilJ.2004. Effects of gender and power on PR managers’ upward influence. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16: 127-144.
64.
PerreweP. L.NelsonD. L.2004. Gender and career success: The facilitative role of political skill. Organizational Dynamics, 33: 366-378.
65.
PichlerS.SimpsonP. A.StrohL. K.2008. The glass ceiling in human resources: Exploring the link between women’s representation in management and the practices of strategic human resource management and employee involvement. Human Resource Management, 47: 463-479.
66.
PierceJ. L.1995. Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
67.
RaginsB. R.SundstromE.1989. Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 105: 51-88.
68.
*RaiH.2009. Gender differences: Ingratiation and leader member exchange quality. Singapore Management Review, 31: 63-72.
69.
RajuN. S.BurkeM. J.NormandJ.LangloisG.1991. A new meta-analytic procedure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 432-446.
70.
ReskinB. F.McBrierD. B.KmecJ. A.1999. The determinants and consequences of workplace sex and race composition. Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 335-361.
71.
RidgewayC. L.1991. The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70: 367-386.
72.
RidgewayC. L.2001. Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57: 637-655.
73.
RidgewayC. L.DiekemaD.JohnsonC.1995. Legitimacy, compliance, and gender in peer groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58: 298-311.
74.
RidgewayC. L.JohnsonC.DiekemaD.1994. External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Social Forces, 72: 1051-1077.
75.
*RizzoA.MendezC.1988. Making things happen in organizations: Does gender make a difference?Public Personnel Management, 1: 9-22.
76.
RudmanL. A.1998. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 629-645.
77.
RudmanL. A.GlickP.1999. Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 1004-1010.
78.
RudmanL. A.GlickP.2001. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57: 743-762.
79.
*ShaughnessyB. A.TreadwayD. C.BrelandJ. A.WilliamsL. V.BrouerR. L.2011. Influence and promotability: The importance of political skill. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26: 584-603.
80.
Smith-CroweK.BurkeM. J.KouchakiM.SignalS. M. in press. Assessing interrater agreement via the average deviation index given a variety of theoretical and methodological problems. Organizational Research Methods.
81.
SparroweR. T.SoetjitpoB. W.KraimerM.2006. Do leaders’ influence tactics relate to members’ helping behavior? It depends on the quality of the relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1194-1208.
82.
SternI.WestphalJ.2010. Stealthy footsteps to the boardroom: Executives’ backgrounds, sophisticated interpersonal influence behavior, and board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 278-319.
83.
*SwiderB. W.BarrickM. R.HarrisT. B.StoverinkA. C.2011. Managing and creating an image in the interview: The role of interviewee initial impressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 1275-1288.
84.
SwimJ.BorgidaE.MaruyamaG.MyersD. G.1989. Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?Psychological Bulletin, 105: 409-429.
85.
*TepperB. J.BrownS. J.HuntM. D.1993. Strength of subordinates’ upward influence tactics and gender congruency effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23: 1903-1919.
86.
*ThackerR. A.WayneS. J.1995. An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management, 21: 739-757.
87.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2011. Employed civilians by occupation, sex, race and Hispanic Origin: 2008. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
88.
WacjmanJ.1998. Managing like a man. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
89.
*WattJ. D.1993. The impact of the frequency of ingratiation on the performance evaluation of bank personnel. Journal of Psychology, 127: 171-177.
90.
*WayneS. J.FerrisG. R.1990. Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in superior-subordinate relations: a laboratory experiment and a field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 487-499.
91.
*YuklG.FalbeC. M.1990. Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 132-140.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
