This special issue is focused on how a Bayesian approach to estimation, inference, and reasoning in organizational research might supplement—and in some cases supplant—traditional frequentist approaches. Bayesian methods are well suited to address the increasingly complex phenomena and problems faced by 21st-century researchers and organizations, where very complex data abound and the validity of knowledge and methods are often seen as contextually driven and constructed. Traditional modeling techniques and a frequentist view of probability and method are challenged by this new reality.
BandyopadhyayP. S.ForsterM. R.2011. Handbook of the philosophy of science: Philosophy of statistics, vol. 7. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
4.
BayarriM. J.BergerJ. O.2004. The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis. Statistical Science, 19: 58-80.
5.
BayesT. P.1763. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 53: 370-418.
6.
BergerJ.2003. Could Fisher, Jeffreys, and Neyman have agreed on testing?Statistical Science, 18: 1-32.
7.
BergerJ. O.BoukaiB.WangY.1997. Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis. Statistical Science, 12: 133-160.
8.
BergerJ. O.BrownL. D.WolpertR. L.1994. A unified conditional frequentist and Bayesian test for fixed and sequential simple hypothesis testing. Annals of Statistics, 22: 1787-1807.
9.
BergerJ. O.SelkeT.1987. Testing a point null hypothesis: The irreconcilability of p values and evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82: 112-122.
10.
CarnapR.1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CartwrightN. D.2006. Well-ordered science: Evidence for use. Philosophy of Science, 73: 981-990.
12.
CartwrightN. D.2007. Hunting causes and using them. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CartwrightN. D.2010. Predicting “it will work for us”: (Way) beyond statistics. In IllariP. M.RussoF.WilliamsonJ. (Eds.), Causality in the sciences: 750-768. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
ChengJ.MadiganD.2010. Bayesian approaches to aspects of the Vioxx trials: Non-ignorable dropout and sequential meta-analysis. In O’HaganA.WestM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of applied Bayesian analysis: 51-68. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
CoxD.MayoD. G.2009. Objectivity and conditionality in frequentist inference. In MayoD. G.SpanosA. (Eds.), Error and inference: Recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability, and the objectivity and rationality of science: 276-304. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DanzigerK.1994. Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DastonL.1994. How probabilities came to be subjective and objective. Historia Mathematica, 21: 330-344.
18.
DastonL.1995. Classical probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
FienbergS. E.2006. When did Bayesian inference become “Bayesian”?Bayesian Analysis, 1: 1-40.
25.
FisherR. A.1935a. Design of experiments. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
26.
FisherR. A.1935b. The logic of inductive inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 98: 39-54.
27.
GabbayD. M.HartmannS.WoodsJ.2011. Handbook of the history of logic: Inductive logic, vol. 10. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
28.
GalavottiM. C.2005. Philosophical introduction to probability. Palo Alto, CA: CSLI.
29.
GalavottiM. C.2011. The modern epistemic interpretations of probability: Logicism and subjectivism. In GabbayD. M.HartmannS.WoodsJ. (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic: Inductive logic, vol. 10: 153-203. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
30.
GarrettE. S.ZegerS. L.2000. Latent class model diagnosis. Biometrics, 56: 1055-1067.
GephartR. P.2006. Ethnostatistics and organizational research methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9: 417-431.
33.
GigerenzerG.1987. Probabilistic thinking and the fight against subjectivity. In KrügerL.GigerenzerG.MorganM. S. (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution, vol. 2: 11-33. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
GigerenzerG.1993. The superego, the ego, and the id in statistical reasoning. In KerenG.LewisC. (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues: 311-339. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
GigerenzerG.2004. Mindless statistics. Journal of Socio-Economics, 33: 587-606.
36.
GigerenzerG.MurrayD. J.1987. Cognition as intuitive statistics. New York: Psychology Press.
37.
GigerenzerG.SwijtinkZ.PorterT.DastonL.BeattyJ.KrügerL.1989. The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
GillJ.2007. Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
39.
GoodI. J.1989. Good thinking: The foundations of probability and its applications. Mineola, NY: Dover.
40.
HackingI.1983. Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
HackingI.1990. The taming of chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
HackingI.1992. Statistical language, statistical truth and statistical reason: The self-authentication of a style of scientific reasoning. In McMullinE. (Ed.), The social dimensions of science, vol. 3: 130-157. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
43.
HackingI.2001. An introduction to probability and inductive logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
HackingI.2002. Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
HackingI.2006. The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
HájekA.2009. Fifteen arguments against hypothetical frequentism. Erkenntnis, 70: 211-235.
47.
HowieD.2002. Interpreting probability: Controversies and developments in the early twentieth century. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
HowsonC.UrbachP.2006. Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (3rd ed.). Peru, IL: Open Court.
49.
JaynesE. T.2003. Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
JeffreyR.2004. Subjective probability: The real thing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
JeffreysH.1939/1998. Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
52.
KadaneJ. B.1995. Prime time for Bayes. Controlled Clinical Trials, 16: 313-318.
53.
KadaneJ. B.1999. The insignificance of null hypothesis significance testing. Political Research Quarterly, 52: 647-674.
54.
KeynesJ. M.1921/2008. A treatise on probability. Seaside, OR: Rough Draft Printing.
55.
KrügerL.DastonL. J.HeidelbergerM.1987. The probabilistic revolution: Ideas in history, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
KrügerL.GigerenzerG.MorganM. S. (1990). The probabilistic revolution: Ideas in the sciences, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
KruschkeJ. K.2010b. What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14: 293-300.
59.
KruschkeJ. K.2011. Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6: 299-312.
60.
LangeM.2011. Hume and the problem of induction. In GabbayD. M.HartmannS.WoodsJ. (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic: Inductive logic, vol. 10: 43-91. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
61.
LaplaceP. S.1774/1986. Memoir on the probability of the causes of events (StiglerS. M., Trans.). Statistical Science, 3: 364-378.
62.
LatourB.2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30: 225-248.
63.
LawJ.2004. After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
64.
LeeS.-Y.2007. Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian perspective. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
65.
LittleR. J.2006. Calibrated Bayes: A Bayes/frequentist roadmap. American Statistician, 60: 213-223.
66.
MacKenzieD.1981. Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930: The social construction of scientific knowledge. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
MayoD. G.CoxD.2009. Frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference. In MayoD. G.SpanosA. (Eds.), Error and inference: Recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability, and the objectivity and rationality of science: 247-275. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
MuthénB.AsparouhovT. In press. Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods.
71.
NeymanJ.1937. Outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 236: 333-380.
72.
NeymanJ.PearsonE.1933. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 231: 289-337.
73.
PeirceC. S.1923/2010. Chance, love, and logic: Philosophical essays (with a supplemental essay by DeweyJohn). Charleston, SC: Nabu Press.
74.
PopperK.1959/2002. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge.
75.
PorterT. M.1986. The rise of statistical thinking, 1820-1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76.
PressS. J.2010. Subjective and objective Bayesian statistics: Principles, models, and applications (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
77.
RamseyF. P.1926/1990. Truth and probability. In MellorD. H. (Ed.), Philosophical papers: 52-94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78.
SavageL. J.1954. Foundations of statistics. New York: John Wiley.
79.
SelkeT.BayarriM. J.BergerJ. O.2001. Calibration of p values for testing precise null hypotheses. American Statistician, 55: 62-71.
80.
SennS.2011. You may believe you are a Bayesian but you are probably wrong. Rationality, Markets, and Morals, 2: 48-66.
81.
ShannonC. E.1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379-423.
82.
ShapinS.SchafferS.1985. Leviathan and the air-pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83.
StiglerS. M.1986. The history of statistics: The measurement of uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84.
VennJ.1866/2006. The logic of chance. Mineola, NY: Dover.
85.
VerranH.2001. Science in an African logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86.
von MisesR.1957. Probability, statistics, and truth. Mineola, NY: Dover.
87.
WagenmakersE.-J.LeeM.LodewyckxT.IversonG.2008. Bayesian versus frequentist inference. In HoijtinkH.KlugkistI.BoelenP. A. (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses: 181-207. New York: Springer.
88.
ZabellS.1989. R. A. Fisher on the history of inverse probability. Statistical Science, 4: 247-263.
89.
ZabellS.2011. Carnap and the logic of induction. In GabbayD. M.HartmannS.WoodsJ. (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic: Inductive logic, vol. 10: 265-309. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
90.
ZyphurM. J.OswaldF. L.2012. Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. Unpublished manuscript.
