Drawing on 50 unique samples (from 37 studies), the authors used meta-analytical techniques to assess the extent to which job burnout and employee engagement are independent and useful constructs. The authors found that (a) dimension-level correlations between burnout and engagement are high, (b) burnout and engagement dimensions exhibit a similar pattern of association with correlates, and (c) controlling for burnout in meta-regression equations substantively reduced the effect sizes associated with engagement. These findings suggest that doubts about the functional distinctiveness of the dimensions underlying burnout and engagement cannot be dismissed as pure speculation.
AguinisH.PierceC. A.CulpepperS. A.2008. Scale coarseness as a methodological artifact: Correcting correlation coefficients attenuated from using coarse scales. Organizational Research Methods, 12: 623-652.
2.
*AndreassenC. S.UrsinH.EriksenH. R.2007. The relationship between strong motivation to work, “workaholism,” and health. Psychology and Health, 22: 615-629.
3.
AstleyW. G.ZammutoR. F.1992. Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3: 443-460.
4.
AveyJ. B.LuthansF.YoussefC. M.2010. The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 36: 430-452.
5.
BagozziR. P.PhillipsL. W.1982. Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 459-489.
6.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.2007. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22: 309-328.
7.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.2008. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development Journal, 13: 209-223. doi:10.1108/1362043081087047610.1108/13620430810870476
8.
*BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.SchaufeliW. B.2005. The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples. Human Relations, 58: 661-689.
9.
*BakkerA. B.EmmerikH.EuwemaM. C.2006. Crossover of burnout and engagement in work teams. Work and Occupations, 33: 464-489.
10.
*BakkerA. B.HakanenJ. J.DemeroutiE.XanthopoulouD.2007. Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99: 274-284.
11.
BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P.2010. Where to go from here: Integration and future research on work engagement. In BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research: 181-196. New York: Psychology Press.
12.
BakkerA. B.SchaufeliW. B.2008. Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 147-154.
13.
BakkerA. B.SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P.TarisT. W.2008. Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work and Stress, 22: 187-200.
BorensteinM.HedgesL.HigginsJ.RothsteinH.2005. Comprehensive meta analysis 2.0. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
17.
*BresóE.SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.2007. Past success and self-efficacy as antecedents of burnout and engagement among Spanish and Portuguese university students. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18.
*BresóE.SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.In press. Can a self-efficacy-based intervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhance performance? A quasi-experimental study. Higher Education.
19.
ChristianM. S.SlaughterJ. E.2007. Work engagement: A meta-analytic review and directions for research in an emerging area. Paper presented at the 67th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia.
20.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.LePineJ. A.2007. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 909-927.
21.
CramptonS. M.WagnerJ. A.1994. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 67-76.
22.
CrawfordE. R.LePineJ. A.RichB. L.2010. Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 834-848.
23.
CronbachL. J.1990. Essentials of psychological testing. New York: HarperCollins.
24.
*DemeroutiE.BakkerA. В.de JongeJ.JanssenP. P. M.2001. Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27: 279-286. Retrieved from http://www.fss.uu.nl/sop
25.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B.2001b. The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 499-512.
26.
DemeroutiE.MostertK.BakkerA. B.2010. Burnout and work engagement: A thorough investigation of the independency of both constructs. Journal of Occupational and Health Psychology, 15: 209-222.
27.
*DuránA.ExtremeraN.ReyL.2004. Engagement and burnout: Analysing their association patterns. Psychological Reports, 94: 1048-1050.
28.
*DuránA.ExtremeraN.ReyL.Fernández-BerrocalP.MontalbánF. M.2006. Predicting academic burnout and engagement in educational settings: Assessing the incremental validity of perceived emotional intelligence beyond perceived stress and general self-efficacy. Psicothema, 18: 158-164. Retrieved from www.psicothema.com/pdf/3292.pdf
29.
DuvalS. J.TweedieR. L.2000. A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95: 89-98.
30.
*GanY.YangM.ZhouY.ZhangY.2007. The two-factor structure of future-oriented coping and its mediating role in student engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 43: 851-863.
31.
GeyskensI.KrishnanR.SteenkampJ.-B. E. M.CunhaP. V.2009. A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35: 393-419.
32.
*González-RomáV.SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.LloretS.2006. Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68: 165-174.
33.
*GorterR. C.Te BrakeH. J.HoogstratenJ.EijkmanM. A.2008. Positive engagement and job resources in dental practice. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 36: 47-54.
34.
GriffinM. A.ParkerS. K.NealA.2008. Is behavioral engagement a distinct and useful construct?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1: 48-51.
35.
*HakanenJ.2002. Työuupumuksesta työn imuun—positiivisen työhyvinvointikäsitteen arviointimenetelmän suomalaisen version validointi opetusalan organisaatiossa [Validation of the Finnish version of an instrument for measuring the job engagement (UWES) in an educational organization]. Työ Ja Ihminen, 1: 42-58. Retrieved from www.ttl.fi/NR/rdonlyres/74CD91B9-DAEA-4475-A895-6F3417F9E63F/0/artikkelit_jari_hakanen.pdf
36.
*HakanenJ. J.BakkerA. B.SchaufeliW. B.2006. Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43: 495-513. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
37.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B.2006. Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 1134-1145.
38.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B.2010. A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research: 102-117. New York: Psychology Press.
39.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B.BuckleyM. R.2004. Burnout in organizational life. Journal of Management, 30: 859-879.
40.
HarrisonD. A.NewmanD. A.RothP. L.2006. How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 305-325.
41.
HarterJ. K.SchmidtF. L.2008. Conceptual versus empirical distinctions among constructs: Implications for discriminant validity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1: 36-39.
42.
HobfollS. E.ShiromA.2000. Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. In GolembiewskiR. T. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (2nd rev. ed.): 57-81. New York: Dekker.
43.
HofmannD. A.JonesL. M.2005. Leadership, collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 509-522.
44.
Huedo-MedinaT. B.Sánchez-MecaJ.Marín-MartínezF.BotellaJ.2006. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I 2 index?Psychological Methods, 11: 193-206.
45.
HuffcuttA. I.ArthurW.Jr.1995. Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 327-334.
46.
HunsleyJ.MeyerG. J.2003. The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15: 446-455.
47.
*JacksonL. T. B.RothmannS.Van de VijverF. J. R.2006. A model of work-related well-being for educators in South Africa. Stress Medicine, 22: 263-274.
48.
JosephD. L.NewmanD. A.2010. Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 54-78.
49.
KahnW. A.1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 692-724. doi:10.2307/256287
50.
*KimH. J.ShinK. H.SwangerN.2009. Burnout and engagement: A comparative analysis using the Big Five personality dimensions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28: 96-104.
51.
KlineR. B.2011. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
52.
KrizanZ.2010. Synthesizer 1.0: A varying coefficient meta-analytic tool. Behavior Research Methods, 42: 863-870.
53.
LamR. W.KennedyS. H.2005. Using metaanalysis to evaluate evidence: Practical tips and traps. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50: 167-174.
54.
*LangelaanS.BakkerA. B.van DoornenL. J. P.SchafeliW. B.2006. Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference?Personality and Individual Differences, 40: 521-532.
55.
LeH.SchmidtF. L.HarterJ. K.LauverK. J.2010. The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112: 112-125.
56.
LeBretonJ. M.HargisM. B.GriepentrogB.OswaldF. L.PloyhartR. E.2007. A multidimensional approach for evaluating variables in organizational research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 60: 475-498.
57.
LeeR. T.AshforthB. E.1996. A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 123−133.
58.
LeiterM. P.MaslachC.2009. Nurse turnover: The mediating role of burnout. Journal of Nursing Management, 17: 331-339.
59.
LeiterM. P.MaslachC.2010. Building engagement: The design and evaluation of interventions. In BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research: 164-180. New York: Psychology Press.
60.
LePineJ. A.ErezA.JohnsonD. E.2002. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 52-65.
61.
*LlorensS.BakkerA. B.SchaufeliW.SalanovaM.2006. Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 13: 378-391.
62.
*LlorensS.SchaufeliW.BakkerA.SalanovaM.2007. Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist?Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 825-841.
63.
LuthansF.AvolioB. J.2009. The “point” of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 291-307.
64.
MaceyW. H.SchneiderB.2008. The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1: 3-30.
MaslachC.LeiterM. P.1997. The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
67.
MaslachC.LeiterM. P.2008. Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 498-512.
68.
MaslachC.LeiterM. P.SchaufeliW.2008. Measuring burnout. In CooperC. L.CartwrightS. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational well-being: 86-108. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
MathieuJ. E.FarrJ. L.1991. Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 127-133.
71.
*MaunoS.KinnunenU.RuokolainenM.2007. Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70: 149-171.
72.
McDanielM. A.HartmanN. S.WhetzelD. L.GrubbW. L.2007. Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60: 63-91.
73.
*MontgomeryA. J.PeetersM. C. W.SchaufeliW. B.Den OudenM.2003. Work-home interference among newspaper managers: Its relationship with burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 16: 195-211.
74.
NewmanD. A.HarrisonD. A.2008. Been there, bottled that: Are state and behavioral work engagement new and useful construct “wines”?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1: 31-35.
75.
*ParzefallM. R.HakanenJ.2010. Psychological contract and its motivational and health-enhancing outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25: 4-21.
76.
*PienaarJ.WillemseS. A.2008. Burnout, engagement, coping and general health of service employees in the hospitality industry. Tourism Management, 29: 1053-1063.
77.
PitariuA. H.PloyhartR. E.2010. Explaining change: Theorizing and testing dynamic mediated longitudinal relationships. Journal of Management, 36: 405-429.
78.
RichB. L.LePineJ. A.CrawfordE. R.2010. Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 617-635.
79.
RosenthalR.1979. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 638-641.
80.
*SalanovaM.AgutS.PeiroJ. M.2005. Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 1217-1227.
81.
*SalanovaM.SchaufeliW.2008. A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19: 116-131.
82.
*SalanovaM.SchaufeliW. B.LlorensS.PeiroJ. M.GrauR.2000. Desde el “burnout” al “engagement”: ¿una nueva perspectiva? [From “burnout” to “engagement”: A new perspective?]. Revista De Psicología Del Trabajo y De Las Organizaciones, 16: 117-134.
83.
*SalanovaM.SchaufeliW.MartínezI.BresóE.2009. How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 1: 1-18.
84.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.2003. UWES—Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Test manual. Unpublished manuscript, Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University. Retrieved from http://www.schaufeli.com
85.
*SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.2004. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 293-315.
86.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.2010. Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. In BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research: 10-24. New York: Psychology Press.
87.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.SalanovaM.2006. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66: 701-716.
88.
*SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.Van RhenenW.2009. How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 893-917.
89.
SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P.MaslachC.2009. Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Development International, 14: 204-220.
90.
*SchaufeliW. B.MartinezI. M.PintoA. M.SalanovaM.BakkerA. B.2002. Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33: 464-481.
91.
*SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.2007. Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 20: 177-196.
92.
*SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-RomáV.BakkerA. B.2002. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3: 71-92.
93.
*SchaufeliW.TarisT.Van RhenenW.2008. Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being?Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57: 173-203.
94.
SchmidtF.2010. Detecting and correcting the lies that data tell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5: 233-242.
95.
SchmidtF.LeH.OhI.-S.2010. The methodological and conceptual basis for estimation of correlations between constructs: Implications for construct validity and construct redundancy. Manuscript submitted for publication.
96.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G.1996. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
97.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T.2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
98.
*ShimazuA.SchaufeliW. B.KosugiS.SuzukiA.NashiwaH.KatoA.SakamotoM.IrimajiriH.AmanoS.HirohataK.2008. Work engagement in Japan: Validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57: 510-523.
99.
SpectorP. E.2006. Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend. Organizational Research Methods, 9: 221-232.
100.
Spence-LaschingerH. K.LeiterM.DayA.GilinD.2009. Workplace empowerment, incivility, and burnout: Impact on staff nurse recruitment and retention outcomes. Journal of Nursing Management, 17: 302-311.
101.
StraussM. E.SmithG. T.2009. Construct validity: Advances in theory and methodology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5: 1-25.
102.
StrubeM. J.HartmannD. P.1983. Meta-analysis: Techniques, applications, and functions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51: 14-27.
103.
SuddabyR.2010. Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35: 346-357.
104.
TonidandelS.LeBretonJ. M.2011. Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26: 1-9.
105.
ValentineJ. C.PigottT. D.RothsteinH. R.2010. How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35: 215-247.
106.
*Van den BroeckA.VansteenkisteM.De WitteH.LensW.2008. Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22: 277-294.
107.
ViswesvaranC.OnesD. S.1995. Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48: 865-885.
108.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA.1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 1063-1070.
109.
WongC.-S.LawK. S.HuangG.2008. On the importance of conducting construct-level analyses for multidimensional constructs in theory development and testing. Journal of Management, 34: 744-764.
110.
WoodJ.2008. Methodology for dealing with duplicate study effects in a meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 79-95.
111.
*XanthopoulouD.BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.SchaufeliW. B.2007. The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14: 121-141.
112.
*ZhangY.GanY.ChamH.2007. Perfectionism, academic burnout and engagement among Chinese college students: A structural equation modeling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 43: 1529-1540.
113.
ZmudR. W.SampsonJ. P.ReardonR. C.LenzJ. G.ByrdT. A.1994. Confounding effects of construct overlap: An example from IS user satisfaction theory. Information Technology & People, 7: 29-45.
