Idiosyncratic deals (or i-deals) are mutually beneficial, personalized agreements of a nonstandard nature that are negotiated between individual employees and their employers. This article outlines the development of a 16-item measure of i-deals negotiated by job incumbents. Across four studies, the authors developed a reliable scale with a multidimensional factor structure that replicated across three separate samples. Study 1 was aimed at verifying that they had appropriately specified the domains across which i-deals are negotiated. In Study 2, the authors developed a measure of i-deals and confirmed its reliability and factor structure. Studies 3 and 4 provided further evidence for the psychometric properties of the i-deals measure and examined antecedents and outcomes of i-deals. Overall, the results indicate that employees negotiate i-deals across four content domains (i.e., schedule flexibility, location flexibility, task and work responsibilities, and financial incentives) and that i-deals have important implications for work attitudes.
AhearnK. K.FerrisG. R.HochwarterW. A.DouglasC.AmmeterA. P.2004. Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30: 309-327.
2.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P.1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1-18.
3.
AnandS.VidyarthiP. R.LidenR. C.RousseauD. M.2010. Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: Idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 970-988.
4.
BailynL.1994. Breaking the mold. New York: Free Press.
5.
BlauP. M.1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
6.
CammannC.FichmanM.JenkinsD.KleshJ.1979. The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Cited in CookJ. D.HepworthS. J.WallT. D.WarrP. B.1981. The experience of work: A compendium and review of 249 measures and their use. New York: Academic Press.
7.
CapelliP.1999. The new deal at work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8.
CattellR. B.1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1: 245-276.
9.
Coyle-ShapiroJ. A.-M.ShoreL.TaylorM. S.TetrickL.2004. The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S.2005. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31: 874-900.
11.
CropanzanoR.RuppD. E.MohlerC. J.SchminkeM.2001. Three roads to organizational justice. In FerrisJ. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 20, pp. 1-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
12.
DabosG. E.RousseauD. M.2004. Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 52-72.
13.
EisenbergerR.HuntingtonR.HutchinsonS.SowaD.1986. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 500-507.
14.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J.1999. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4: 272-299.
15.
GoldenT. D.2006. The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 319-340.
16.
GraenG.NovakM. A.SommerkampP.1982. The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30: 109-131.
17.
GraenG. B.ScanduraT. A.1987. Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 175-208.
18.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM.1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219-247.
19.
GreenbergJ.RobergeM.HoV. T.RousseauD. M.2004. Fairness in idiosyncratic work arrangements: Justice as an i-deal. In MartocchioJ. J. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 23, pp. 1-34). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R.1976. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 250-279.
21.
HarrisonD. A.NewmanD. A.RothP. L.2006. How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 305-325.
22.
HinkinT. R.1998. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 104-121.
23.
HornungS.RousseauD. M.GlaserJ.2008. Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 655-664.
24.
HornungS.RousseauD. M.GlaserJ.2009. Why supervisors make idiosyncratic deals: Antecedents and outcomes of i-deals from a managerial perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24: 738-764.
25.
HornungS.RousseauD. M.GlaserJ.AngererP.WeigelM.2010. Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31: 187-215.
26.
JackofskyE. F.1984. Turnover and job performance: An integrated process model. Academy of Management Review, 9: 74-83.
27.
LeBretonJ. M.HargisM. B.GriepentrogB.OswaldF. L.PloyhartR. E.2007. A multidimensional approach for evaluating variables in organizational research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 60: 475-498.
28.
LidenR. C.SparroweR. T.WayneS. J.1997. Leader–member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In FerrisG. R. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 15, pp. 47-120). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
29.
LockeE. A.1969. What is job satisfaction?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4: 309-336.
30.
LoherB. T.NoeR. A.MoellerN. L.FitzgeraldM. P.1985. A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70: 280-289.
31.
MaslynJ.Uhl-BienM.2001. Leader–member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self and other effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 697-708.
32.
McGeeG.FordR.1987. Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Reexamination of the continuance and affective scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 642-648.
33.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J.SmithC. A.1993. Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 538-551.
34.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P.2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879-903.
35.
RhoadesL.EisenbergerR.2002. Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 698-714.
36.
RousseauD. M.1989. Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2: 121-139.
37.
RousseauD. M.2001a. Idiosyncratic deals: Flexibility versus fairness?Organizational Dynamics, 29: 260-273.
38.
RousseauD. M.2001b. Schema, promise, and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74: 511-541.
39.
RousseauD. M.2004. Under the table deals: Preferential, unauthorized or idiosyncratic? In GriffinR.O’Leary-KellyA. (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 262-290). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
RousseauD. M.2005. I-deals: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
41.
RousseauD. M.HoV. T.GreenbergJ.2006. I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31: 977-994.
42.
RousseauD. M.HornungS.KimT. G.2009. Idiosyncratic deals: Testing propositions on timing, content, and the employment relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74: 338-348.
43.
RousseauD. M.KimT.2006. Idiosyncratic deals: How negotiating their own employment conditions affects workers’ relationships with an employer. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Academy of Management, Oxford, UK.
44.
ShoreL. M.TetrickL. E.LynchP.BarksdaleK.2006. Social and economic exchange: Construct development and validation. Journal of Applied and Social Psychology, 36: 837-867.
45.
ShoreL. M.TetrickL. E.TaylorM. S.Coyle-ShapiroJ.LidenR. C.McLean-ParksJ.MorrisonE. W.PorterL. W.RobinsonS. L.RoehlingM. V.RousseauD. M.SchalkR.TsuiA. S.Van DyneL.2004. The employee–organization relationship: A timely concept in a period of transition. In MartocchioJ. J. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 23, pp. 291-370). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
46.
StantonJ. M.WeissE. M.2002. Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the StudyResponse Project. Technical Report Number 13001, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
47.
TaingM. U.GroffK. W.GrangerB. P.JacksonE. M.JohnsonR. E.in press. The multidimensional nature of continuance commitment: Commitment owing to economic exchanges versus employment alternatives. Journal of Business and Psychology.
48.
TekleabA. G.TakeuchiR.TaylorM. S.2005. Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 146-157.
49.
ThompsonL. L.2001. The mind and heart of the negotiator (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
50.
TreadwayD. C.HochwarterW. A.KacmarC. J.FerrisG. R.2005. Political will, political skill, and political behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 229-245.
51.
TsuiA. S.PearceJ. L.PorterL. W.TripoliA. M.1997. Alternative approaches to the employee–organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off?Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1089-1121.
52.
WrzesniewskiA.DuttonJ. E.2001. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26: 179-201.
