What role do users play during innovation? Ever since it was argued that users can also be the sources of innovation, the literature on the role of users during innovation has grown tremendously. In this article, the authors review this growing literature, critique it, and develop some of the research questions that could be explored to contribute to this literature and to the theoretical perspectives that underpin the literature.
Abernathy, W.J., & Clark, K.B.1985. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction . Research Policy, 14: 3-22.
2.
Afuah, A.2000. How much do your "co-opetitors" capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management Journal , 21: 387-404.
3.
Afuah, A.2001. Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1211-1228.
4.
Bacharach, S.B.1989. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation . Academy of Management Review, 14: 496-515.
5.
Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., & von Hippel, E.2006. How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy, 35: 1291-1313.
6.
Barney, J.B.1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
7.
Benkler, Y.2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Bogers, M.2009. The sources of process innovation in user firms: An exploration of the antecedents and impact of non-R&D innovation and learning-by-doing . Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne.
9.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K.2001. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 597-621.
10.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M.1961. The management of innovation. London : Tavistock.
11.
Buur, J., & Matthews, B.2008. Participatory innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12: 255-273.
12.
Chatterji, A.K., & Fabrizio, K.2008. The impact of users on technological development: The role of physician innovation in the medical device industry. Working paper. Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.
13.
Chesbrough, H.W.2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A.1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
15.
Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M.W.2006. A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Research Policy, 35: 1243-1259.
16.
de Jong, J.P.J., & von Hippel, E.2009. Transfers of user process innovations to process equipment producers: A study of Dutch high-tech firms . Research Policy, 38: 1181-1191.
17.
Dosi, G.1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation . Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 1120-1171.
18.
Douthwaite, B., Keatinge, J.D.H., & Park, J.R.2001. Why promising technologies fail: The neglected role of user innovation during adoption. Research Policy, 30: 819-836.
19.
Enos, J.L.1962. Petroleum progress and profits: A history of process innovation . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Faulkner, P., & Runde, J.2009. On the identity of technological objects and user innovations in function. Academy of Management Review, 34: 442-462.
21.
Foxall, G.R., & Tierney, J.D.1984. From CAP1 to CAP2: User-initiated innovation from the user’s point of view. Management Decision, 22(5): 3-15.
22.
Franke, N., & Shah, S.2003. How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy , 32: 157-178.
23.
Franke, N., & von Hippel, E.2003. Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Research Policy, 32: 1199-1215.
24.
Franz, K.2005. Tinkering: Consumers reinvent the early automobile. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
Freeman, C.1968. Chemical process plant: Innovation and the world market . National Institute Economic Review, 45: 29-57.
26.
Gans, J.S., & Stern, S.2003. The product market and the market for "ideas": Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32: 333-350.
27.
Gilbert, R.J., & Newbery, D.M.G.1982. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review, 72: 514-526.
28.
Haefliger, S., von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S.2008. Code reuse in open source software. Management Science, 54: 180-193.
29.
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E.2003. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations . Research Policy, 32: 1753-1769.
30.
Henderson, R.M.1993. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment industry. Rand Journal of Economics, 24: 248-270.
31.
Henderson, R.M., & Clark, K.B.1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
32.
Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E.2005. Welfare implications of user innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30: 73-87.
33.
Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E.1992. From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a "low-tech" field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9: 213-221.
34.
Hill, C.W.L., & Rothaermel, F.T.2003. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28: 257-274.
35.
Hollander, S.1965. The sources of increased efficiency: A study of DuPont rayon plants. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Jacobides, M.G., & Billinger, S.2006. Designing the boundaries of the firm: From "make, buy, or ally" to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organization Science, 17: 249-261.
37.
Jensen, M.B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36: 680-693.
38.
Jeppesen, L.B.2005. User toolkits for innovation: Consumers support each other . Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22: 347-363.
39.
Jeppesen, L.B., & Frederiksen, L.2006. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments . Organization Science, 17: 45-63.
40.
Lakhani, K.R., & von Hippel, E.2003. How open source software works: "Free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32: 923-943.
41.
Langlois, R.N., & Robertson, P.L.1992. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries . Research Policy, 21: 297-313.
42.
Lee, K.R.1996. The role of user firms in the innovation of machine tools: The Japanese case. Research Policy, 25: 491-507.
43.
Leonard-Barton, D.1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17: 251-267.
44.
Leonard-Barton, D.1992. The factory as a learning laboratory. MIT Sloan Management Review, 34(1): 23-38.
45.
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J.2002. Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50: 197-234.
46.
Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemuenden, H.G.2006. Learning from users for radical innovation. International Journal of Technology Management , 33: 25-45.
47.
Lhuillery, S., & Bogers, M.2006. Measuring user innovation: What can a standard innovation survey tell us?Paper presented at the International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: History and New Perspectives, Lugano.
48.
Lilien, G.L., Morrison, P.D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & von Hippel, E.2002. Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48: 1042-1059.
49.
Lundvall, B.-Å.1988. Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg , & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory: 349-369. London: Pinter.
50.
Lüthje, C.2004. Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: An empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation, 24: 683-695.
51.
Lüthje, C., & Herstatt, C.2004. The lead user method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R&D Management, 34: 553-568.
52.
Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E.2005. User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy , 34: 951-965.
53.
Morrison, P.D., Roberts, J.H., & von Hippel, E.2000. Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science , 46: 1513-1527.
Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G.1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
56.
Nonaka, I.1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation . Organization Science, 5: 14-37.
57.
Ogawa, S.1998. Does sticky information affect the locus of innovation? Evidence from the Japanese convenience-store industry. Research Policy, 26: 777-790.
58.
Ogawa, S., & Piller, F.T.2006. Reducing the risks of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2): 65-71.
59.
Oliveira, P., & von Hippel, E.2009. Users as service innovators: The case of banking services. Working paper no. 4748-09, MIT Sloan School of Management.
60.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.1997. The measurement of scientific and technological activities: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data (Oslo Manual) (2nd ed.). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development .
61.
Piller, F.T., & Walcher, D.2006. Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36: 307-318.
62.
Pisano, G.P.1994. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 85-100.
63.
Polanyi, M.1958. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy . Chicago: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
64.
Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V.2003. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
65.
Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., & Balka, K.2009. On the open design of tangible goods. R&D Management, 39: 382-393.
66.
Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., & Lock, P.2008. The dynamics of user innovation: Drivers and impediments of innovation activities. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12: 377-398.
67.
Reinganum, J.F.1983. Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review, 73: 741-748.
68.
Rice, R.E., & Rogers, E.M.1980. Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge: Creation , Diffusion, Utilization, 1: 499-514.
69.
Riggs, W., & von Hippel, E.1994. Incentives to innovate and the sources of innovation: The case of scientific instruments. Research Policy, 23: 459-469.
70.
Rosenberg, N.1982. Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A.2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 287-306.
72.
Rothwell, R.1977. The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms. R&D Management, 3: 191-206.
73.
Rothwell, R., & Gardiner, P.1985. Invention, innovation, re-innovation and the role of the user: A case study of British hovercraft development. Technovation , 3: 167-186.
74.
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E.2005. Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4): 4-17.
75.
Shah, S.K.2006. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52: 1000-1014.
76.
Shah, S.K., & Tripsas, M.2007. The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 123-140.
77.
Shaw, B.1985. The role of the interaction between the user and the manufacturer in medical equipment innovation. R&D Management, 15: 283-292.
78.
Simon, H.A.1965. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: Free Press.
79.
Skiba, F., & Herstatt, C.2009. Users as sources for radical service innovations: Opportunities from collaboration with service lead users. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12: 317-337.
80.
Slaughter, S.1993. Innovation and learning during implementation: A comparison of user and manufacturer innovations. Research Policy, 22: 81-95.
81.
Smith, A.1776/1999. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Penguin.
82.
Spital, F.1979. An analysis of the role of users in the total R&D portfolios of scientific instrument firms. Research Policy , 8: 284-296.
83.
Stuermer, M., Spaeth, S., & von Krogh, G.2009. Extending private-collective innovation: A case study . R&D Management, 39: 170-191.
84.
Sutton, R.I., & Staw, B.M.1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371-384.
85.
Teece, D.J.1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 285-305.
86.
Tietz, R., Morrison, P.D., Lüthje, C., & Herstatt, C.2005. The process of user-innovation: A case study on user innovation in a consumer goods setting. International Journal of Product Development, 2: 321-338.
87.
Tripsas, M.1997. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 119-142.
Urban, G.L., & von Hippel, E.1988. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science , 34: 569-582.
90.
Utterback, J.M.1994. Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
91.
Vargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F.2004. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1): 1-17.
92.
von Hippel, E.1976. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5: 212-239.
93.
von Hippel, E.1978. A customer-active paradigm for industrial product idea generation. Research Policy, 7: 240-266.
94.
von Hippel, E.1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32: 791-805.
95.
von Hippel, E.1988. The sources of innovation. New York : Oxford University Press.
96.
von Hippel, E.1994. "Sticky information" and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40: 429-439.
97.
von Hippel, E.2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
98.
von Hippel, E.2007. Horizontal innovation networks: By and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16: 293-315.
99.
von Hippel, E., & Katz, R.2002. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48: 821-833.
100.
von Hippel, E., & Tyre, M.J.1995. How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Research Policy, 24: 1-12.
101.
von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G.2003. Open source software and the "private-collective" innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science , 14: 209-223.
102.
von Krogh, G., & von Hippel, E.2003. Special issue on open source software development. Research Policy, 32: 1149-1157.
103.
von Krogh, G., & von Hippel, E.2006. The promise of research on open source software. Management Science, 52: 975-983.
104.
Voss, C.A.1985. The role of users in the development of applications software . Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2: 113-121.
105.
West, J., & Gallagher, S.2006. Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36: 319-331.
106.
Whetten, D.A.1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14: 490-495.
