Past work leaves open whether conflict helps or hinders team
innovation. Reconciling this inconsistency, Study 1 showed that work teams were
more innovative when the level of task conflict was moderate instead of low or
high. Study 2 showed that this curvilinear effect exists for task conflict, but
not for relationship conflict, and that the effects of task conflict are mediated
by collaborative problem solving. Study 2 also showed that although moderate
levels of task conflict may promote team innovation, it simultaneously reduces
short-term goal attainment in teams. Implications for conflict (management) theory
and work on innovation are discussed.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M.1996. Assessing the work environment for
creativity. Academy of Management Journal,
39: 1154-1184.
2.
Amason, A. C.1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and
dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top
management groups. Academy of Management Journal,
39: 123-148.
3.
Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J.1997. The effects of top management team size and
interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict.
Journal of Management, 23:
495-516.
4.
Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D.1997. The effect of conflict on strategic decision making
effectiveness and organizational performance. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations:101-115. London:
SAGE Publications.
5.
Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A.2004. The routinization of innovation research: A
constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25:
147-174.
6.
Anderson, N., & West, M. A.1998. Measuring climate for work group innovation:
Development and validation of the team climate inventory.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19:
235-258.
7.
Bliese, P. D.2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and
reliability: Implications for data-analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in
organizations:349-381. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
8.
Broadbent, D. E.1972. Decision and stress. New
York: Academic
Press.
9.
Brown, L. R.1983. Managing conflict at organizational interfaces.
Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
10.
Campbell, J. P.1976. On the nature of organizational
effectiveness. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness:13-55. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
11.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C.1993. Relations between work group characteristics and
effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups.
Personnel Psychology, 46:
823-850.
12.
Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M.1998. Social values and social conflict in creative
problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 74:
1300-1309.
13.
DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A.2001. Maximizing the benefit of task conflict: The role
of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict
Management, 12:
4-22.
14.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert, E.1997. Using conflict in organizations.
London: SAGE
Publications.
15.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Vianen, A. E. M.2001. Responses to relationship conflict and team
effectiveness. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 22:
309-328.
16.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R.2003a. Task versus relationship conflict, team
effectiveness, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 88:
741-749.
17.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R.2003b. Toward a contingency theory of conflict and
performance in groups and organizational teams. In M. A. West, D. Tjosvold, & K. Smith (Eds), International handbook of organizational teamwork and
cooperative working:151-166. Chichester, UK:
Wiley.
18.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A.2001. Minority dissent and team innovation: The
importance of participation in decision making. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 86:
1191-1201.
19.
Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E.1999. Attaining decision quality and commitment from
dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic
decision-making teams. Academy of Management
Journal, 42:
389-402.
20.
Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanijan, R. K.1999. Multilevel theorizing about creativity in
organizations: A sense-making perspective. Academy of
Management Review, 24:
286-307.
21.
Edmondson, A.1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work
teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,
44: 350-383.
22.
Forsyth, D.1983. An introduction to group dynamics.
Monterey, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
23.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J.2002. Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and
good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 87:
687-697.
24.
Georgopoloulos, B. S.1986. Organizational structure, problem-solving, and
effectiveness. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
25.
Gruenfeld, D. H., Thomas-Hunt, M. C., & Kim, P. H.1998. Cognitive flexibility, information exchange
strategy, and integrative complexity in groups: Public versus private reactions to
majority and minority status. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 34:
202-226.
26.
Guetzkow, H., & Gyr, J.1954. An analysis of conflict in decision making
groups. Human Relations, 7:
367-381.
27.
Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P.1992. Group performance and intergroup relations in
organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational
psychology:269-313. Palo Alto, CA:
Consulting Psychologists Press.
28.
Hackman, R.1983. The design of effective work
groups. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior:315-342. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice
Hall.
29.
James, L. R., DeMaree, R. G., & Wolf, G.1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with
and without response bias. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 69:
85-98.
30.
Janssen, O.2001. Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the
curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job
satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal,
44: 1039-1050.
31.
Janssen, O.2003. Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the
price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
76: 347-364.
32.
Jehn, K.1994. Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of
advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict.
International Journal of Conflict Management, 5:
223-238.
33.
Jehn, K.1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and
detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 40:
256-282.
34.
Jehn, K.1997. Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups:
Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In
C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations:87-100. London:
SAGE Publications.
35.
Jehn, K., & Bendersky, C.2003. Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency
perspective on the conflict-out-come relationship. In R. M. Kramer & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 25:
187-242. New York:
Elsevier.
36.
Jex, S. M.1998. Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and
implications for managerial practice. Thousand Oaks,
CA: SAGE
Publications.
37.
Kanter, R. M.1983. The change masters. New
York: Simon &
Schuster.
38.
Kanter, R. M.1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural,
collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations.
In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour, vol. 10:
169-211. Greenwich,
CT: JAI.
39.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N.1998. Data analysis in social psychology.
In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & A. Lindzey (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology, vol. 1:
233-265. Boston:
McGraw-Hill.
40.
Leenders, R. T., van Engelen, J., & Kratzer, J.2003. Virtuality, information exchange, and new product
team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of
Engineering and Technology Management, 20:
69-92.
41.
Lord, R., & Novick, M.1968. Statistical theories of mental test scoring.
Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
42.
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R.2001. Maximizing crossfunctional new product teams’
innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict information exchanges
perspective. Academy of Management Journal,
44: 779-783.
43.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V.2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other
intervening variable effects. Psychological
Methods, 7:
83-104.
44.
Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E.1991. The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of
British string quartets. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 36:
165-186.
45.
Nemeth, C., & Chiles, C.1988. Modelling courage: The role of dissent in fostering
independence. European Journal of Social
Psychology, 18:
275-280.
46.
Nemeth, C. J., & Staw, B. M.1989. The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in
groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 22:
175-210. New York:
Academic Press.
47.
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L.1981. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of human
social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
48.
Pritchard, R. D.1992. Organizational productivity. In
M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational
psychology, vol. 3: 443-471.
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting
Psychologists Press.
49.
Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L.1993. Complex interdependence in task-performing
groups. Journal of Applied Psychology,
78: 61-72.
50.
Scott, R. K.1995. Creative employees: A challenge to
managers. Journal of Creative Behavior,
29: 64-71.
51.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R.2004. The effects of personal and contextual
characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?Journal of Management, 30:
933-958.
52.
Simons, T., & Peterson, R.2000. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top
management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 85:
102-111.
53.
Stevens, J.1992. Applied multivariate statistics for the social
sciences (3rd ed.). New
York: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
54.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M.2004. The Pygmalion process and employee
creativity. Journal of Management,
30: 413-432.
55.
Tjosvold, D.1997. Conflict within interdependence: Its value for
productivity and individuality. In C. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations:23-37. London:
SAGE Publications.
56.
Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R.1997. Mitigating groupthink by stimulating constructive
conflict. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations:53-71. London:
SAGE Publications.
57.
Van de Vliert, E., & De Dreu, C. K. W.1994. Optimizing performance by stimulating
conflict. International Journal of Conflict
Management, 5:
211-222.
58.
Van Dyne, L., Jehn, K. A., & Cummings, A.2002. Differential effects of strain on two forms of work
performance: Individual employee sales and creativity.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23:
57-74.
59.
Van Dyne, L., & Saaverda, R.1996. A naturalistic minority influence experiment:
Effects on divergent thinking, conflict, and originality in
work-groups. British Journal of Social
Psychology, 35:
151-168.
60.
Wageman, R.1995. Interdependence and group
effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly,
40: 145-181.
61.
Wall, J., & Callister, R.1995. Conflict and its management.
Journal of Management, 21:
515-558.
62.
Walton, R. E.1969. Interpersonal peacemaking: Confrontations and third party
consultation. Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
63.
West, M. A.2002. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An
integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation within
groups. Applied Psychology: An International
Review, 51:
355-386.
64.
West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R.1996. Innovation in top management teams.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 81:
680-693.
65.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L.1990. Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work:3-13. Chichester, UK:
Wiley.
66.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W.1993. Toward a theory of organizational
creativity. Academy of Management Review,
18: 293-321.
67.
Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D.1908. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of
habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurological
Psychology, 18:
459-482.
68.
Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbeck, J.1973. Innovations and organizations. New
York: Wiley.
69.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M.2001. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity:
Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management
Journal, 44:
682-696.
