When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams

Abstract

Past work leaves open whether conflict helps or hinders team innovation. Reconciling this inconsistency, Study 1 showed that work teams were more innovative when the level of task conflict was moderate instead of low or high. Study 2 showed that this curvilinear effect exists for task conflict, but not for relationship conflict, and that the effects of task conflict are mediated by collaborative problem solving. Study 2 also showed that although moderate levels of task conflict may promote team innovation, it simultaneously reduces short-term goal attainment in teams. Implications for conflict (management) theory and work on innovation are discussed.

Keywords

groups teams conflict innovation cooperation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amabile, T. M. , Conti, R. , Coon, H. , Lazenby, J. , & Herron, M. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1154-1184.

Amason, A. C. 1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management groups. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 123-148.

Amason, A. C. , & Sapienza, H. J. 1997. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23: 495-516.

Amason, A. C. , & Schweiger, D. 1997. The effect of conflict on strategic decision making effectiveness and organizational performance. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations: 101-115. London: SAGE Publications.

Anderson, N. , De Dreu, C. K. W. , & Nijstad, B. A. 2004. The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 147-174.

Anderson, N. , & West, M. A. 1998. Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19: 235-258.

Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data-analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations: 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Broadbent, D. E. 1972. Decision and stress. New York: Academic Press.

Brown, L. R. 1983. Managing conflict at organizational interfaces. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

10.

Campbell, J. P. 1976. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness: 13-55. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Campion, M. A. , Medsker, G. J. , & Higgs, A. C. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 823-850.

12.

Carnevale, P. J. , & Probst, T. M. 1998. Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1300-1309.

13.

DeChurch, L. A. , & Marks, M. A. 2001. Maximizing the benefit of task conflict: The role of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12: 4-22.

14.

De Dreu, C. K. W. , & Van de Vliert, E. 1997. Using conflict in organizations. London: SAGE Publications.

15.

De Dreu, C. K. W. , & Van Vianen, A. E. M. 2001. Responses to relationship conflict and team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 309-328.

16.

De Dreu, C. K. W. , & Weingart, L. R. 2003a. Task versus relationship conflict, team effectiveness, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 741-749.

17.

De Dreu, C. K. W. , & Weingart, L. R. 2003b. Toward a contingency theory of conflict and performance in groups and organizational teams. In M. A. West , D. Tjosvold , & K. Smith (Eds), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working: 151-166. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

18.

De Dreu, C. K. W. , & West, M. A. 2001. Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1191-1201.

19.

Dooley, R. S. , & Fryxell, G. E. 1999. Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 389-402.

20.

Drazin, R. , Glynn, M. A. , & Kazanijan, R. K. 1999. Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sense-making perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24: 286-307.

21.

Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350-383.

22.

Forsyth, D. 1983. An introduction to group dynamics. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

23.

George, J. M. , & Zhou, J. 2002. Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 687-697.

24.

Georgopoloulos, B. S. 1986. Organizational structure, problem-solving, and effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

25.

Gruenfeld, D. H. , Thomas-Hunt, M. C. , & Kim, P. H. 1998. Cognitive flexibility, information exchange strategy, and integrative complexity in groups: Public versus private reactions to majority and minority status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34: 202-226.

26.

Guetzkow, H. , & Gyr, J. 1954. An analysis of conflict in decision making groups. Human Relations, 7: 367-381.

27.

Guzzo, R. A. , & Shea, G. P. 1992. Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 269-313. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

28.

Hackman, R. 1983. The design of effective work groups. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior: 315-342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

29.

James, L. R. , DeMaree, R. G. , & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85-98.

30.

Janssen, O. 2001. Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1039-1050.

31.

Janssen, O. 2003. Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76: 347-364.

32.

Jehn, K. 1994. Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5: 223-238.

33.

Jehn, K. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256-282.

34.

Jehn, K. 1997. Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations: 87-100. London: SAGE Publications.

35.

Jehn, K. , & Bendersky, C. 2003. Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-out-come relationship. In R. M. Kramer & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 25: 187-242. New York: Elsevier.

36.

Jex, S. M. 1998. Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and implications for managerial practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

37.

Kanter, R. M. 1983. The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.

38.

Kanter, R. M. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour, vol. 10: 169-211. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

39.

Kenny, D. A. , Kashy, D. A. , & Bolger, N. 1998. Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert , S. T. Fiske , & A. Lindzey (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology, vol. 1: 233-265. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

40.

Leenders, R. T. , van Engelen, J. , & Kratzer, J. 2003. Virtuality, information exchange, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20: 69-92.

41.

Lord, R. , & Novick, M. 1968. Statistical theories of mental test scoring. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

42.

Lovelace, K. , Shapiro, D. L. , & Weingart, L. R. 2001. Maximizing crossfunctional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict information exchanges perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 779-783.

43.

MacKinnon, D. P. , Lockwood, C. M. , Hoffman, J. M. , West, S. G. , & Sheets, V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7: 83-104.

44.

Murnighan, J. K. , & Conlon, D. E. 1991. The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 165-186.

45.

Nemeth, C. , & Chiles, C. 1988. Modelling courage: The role of dissent in fostering independence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 275-280.

46.

Nemeth, C. J. , & Staw, B. M. 1989. The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 22: 175-210. New York: Academic Press.

47.

Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L. 1981. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of human social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

48.

Pritchard, R. D. 1992. Organizational productivity. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 3: 443-471. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

49.

Saavedra, R. , Earley, P. C. , & Van Dyne, L. 1993. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 61-72.

50.

Scott, R. K. 1995. Creative employees: A challenge to managers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29: 64-71.

51.

Shalley, C. E. , Zhou, J. , & Oldham, G. R. 2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30: 933-958.

52.

Simons, T. , & Peterson, R. 2000. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 102-111.

53.

Stevens, J. 1992. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

54.

Tierney, P. , & Farmer, S. M. 2004. The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30: 413-432.

55.

Tjosvold, D. 1997. Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality. In C. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations: 23-37. London: SAGE Publications.

56.

Turner, M. E. , & Pratkanis, A. R. 1997. Mitigating groupthink by stimulating constructive conflict. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations: 53-71. London: SAGE Publications.

57.

Van de Vliert, E. , & De Dreu, C. K. W. 1994. Optimizing performance by stimulating conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5: 211-222.

58.

Van Dyne, L. , Jehn, K. A. , & Cummings, A. 2002. Differential effects of strain on two forms of work performance: Individual employee sales and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 57-74.

59.

Van Dyne, L. , & Saaverda, R. 1996. A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects on divergent thinking, conflict, and originality in work-groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35: 151-168.

60.

Wageman, R. 1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 145-181.

61.

Wall, J. , & Callister, R. 1995. Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21: 515-558.

62.

Walton, R. E. 1969. Interpersonal peacemaking: Confrontations and third party consultation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

63.

West, M. A. 2002. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation within groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51: 355-386.

64.

West, M. A. , & Anderson, N. R. 1996. Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 680-693.

65.

West, M. A. , & Farr, J. L. 1990. Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 3-13. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

66.

Woodman, R. W. , Sawyer, J. E. , & Griffin, R. W. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293-321.

67.

Yerkes, R. M. , & Dodson, J. D. 1908. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurological Psychology, 18: 459-482.

68.

Zaltman, G. , Duncan, R. , & Holbeck, J. 1973. Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.

69.

Zhou, J. , & George, J. M. 2001. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 682-696.