KoretzRL. JPEN Journal Club 11. Early stopping. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015;39:369–371.
6.
HigginsJPTAltmanDGSterneJAC, eds. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: HigginsJPTGreenS eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. London, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Updated March 2011.
7.
SchulzKFChalmersIHayesRJAltmanDG.Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412.
8.
CasaerMPHermansGWilmerAVan den BergheG.Impact of early parenteral nutrition completing enteral nutrition in adult critically ill patients (EPaNIC trial): a study protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011;12:21.
9.
MoherDPhamBJonesA. Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Lancet. 1998;352(9128):609–613.
10.
HigginsJPTAltmanDGGotzschePC. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928.
11.
HeideggerCPBergerMMNGrafS. Optimisation of energy provision with supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381:385–393.