This study examines how stable personality traits influence ethical rationalization and behavioral intent among professional accountants. Drawing on a value–behavior correspondence framework, we investigate whether narcissism—a self-focused, entitlement-oriented trait—moderates the ethical consequences of construal mindset and moral disengagement. Based on a survey of 83 licensed CPAs, we find that narcissism changes how these traits operate. High-level construal mindset is associated with less rationalization only among individuals low in narcissism, while moral disengagement predicts rationalization only when narcissism is high. Rationalization, in turn, strongly predicts unethical action intentions in accounting scenarios. Structural equation modeling confirms a moderated mediation model: narcissism increases the likelihood that abstract thinking and disengagement tendencies lead to rationalization, which then predicts unethical intent. These findings challenge the assumption that abstract thinking or moral disengagement have consistent ethical effects. By placing narcissism at the center of our framework, we offer a more nuanced view of how personality traits interact in ethically ambiguous accounting settings. The study highlights the importance of tailoring ethics interventions to account for individual differences in personality.
AmesD. R.RoseP.AndersonC. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
BackofA. G.CarpenterT. D.ThayerJ. (2018). Auditing complex estimates: How do construal level and evidence formatting impact auditors’ consideration of inconsistent evidence?Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(4), 1798–1815. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12368
5.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
6.
BanduraA. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322
7.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
8.
CampbellW. K.FosterJ. D.BrunellA. B. (2004). Running from shame or reveling in pride? Narcissism and the regulation of self-conscious emotions. Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860802505129
9.
CapraraG.FidaR.VecchioneM.TramontanoC.BarbarnelliC. (2009). Assessing civic moral disengagement: Dimensionality and construct validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.027
10.
ChambersV.ReckersP.WhitecottonS. (2023). It’s not always black and white – Identifying characteristics of managers who perceive and use ambiguous accounting to their advantage. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 35(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.2308/BRIA-2021-031
DuffyM. K.ScottK. L.ShawJ. D.TepperB. J.AquinoK. (2012). A social context model of envy and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 643–666. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0804
FosterJ. D.ReidyD. E.MisraT. A.GoffJ. S. (2011). Narcissism and stock market investing: Correlates and consequences of cocksure investing. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 816–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.002
15.
FosterJ. D.TrimmR. F. (2008). On being eager and uninhibited: Narcissism and approach-avoidance motivation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316688
16.
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351
17.
GiacomantonioM.de DreuC. W.ShalviS.SligteD.LederS. (2010). Psychological distance boosts value-behavior correspondence in ultimatum bargaining and integrative negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 824–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.001
18.
GongH.MedinD. L. (2012). Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(5), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006343
19.
GuggenmosR. D.Van der StedeW. A. (2020). The effects of creative culture on real earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(4), 2319–2356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12586
20.
HamC.LangM.SybertN.WangS. (2017). CFO narcissism and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(5), 1089–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12176
21.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
22.
HayesM. J.ReckersP. (2020). The role of narcissistic hypocrisy in the development of accounting estimates. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1199–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12552
23.
HerdaD. N.LauckJ. R. (2024). Seeing the trees: How a concrete versus abstract mindset improves performance on low-level assurance tasks. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 37(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2308/BRIA-2024-008
24.
JonesB. D.WoodmanT.BarlowM.RobertsR. (2017). The darker side of personality: Narcissism predicts moral disengagement and antisocial behavior in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 31(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2016-0007
25.
KadousK.KennedyS. J.PeecherM. E. (2003). The effect of quality assessment and directional goal commitment on auditors' acceptance of client-preferred accounting methods. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.759
26.
LibermanN.TropeY. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
27.
LoweJ.ReckersP.SauciucA. (2023). The influence of professional commitment and rationalization-discrediting interventions on unethical audit decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 42(3), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2020-068
28.
MaksymovE.PeecherM.SutherlandA.WeberJ. (2024). Auditor partners’ role in material misstatement resolution: Survey and interview evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 62 (1), 275–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12506
29.
MazarN.AmirO.ArielyD. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633
30.
MooreC.DetertJ. R.TreviñoL. K.BakerD. D.MayerD. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1–48.
31.
MurphyP. R. (2012). Attitude, Machiavellianism, and the rationalization of misreporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(4), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.04.002
32.
OlsenK. J.StekelbergJ. (2016). CEO narcissism and corporate tax sheltering. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 38(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-51251
33.
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
34.
ReinsteinA.ReckersP. (2022). The effects of exposing CPAs to rationalizations: Conscious and unconscious outcomes. Accounting Horizons, 36(4), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-2020-113
35.
RijsenbiltA.CommandeurH. (2013). Narcissus enters the courtroom: CEO narcissism and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 41–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1528-7
36.
RixomJ.MishraH. (2014). Ethical ends: Effect of abstract mindsets in ethical decisions for the greater social good. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.02.001
37.
RobertsB.EdmondsG.GrijalvaE. (2010). It is developmental me: Developmental changes are more important than generational changes in narcissism-commentary on Trzesniewski and Donnellan. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 5(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609357019
ShenH.ZhaoX.JiangX.WangA. (2021). Power distance and leader integrity: The roles of moral disengagement and narcissism. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 49(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.10162
40.
SuhI.SweeneyJ. T.LinkeK.WallJ. M. (2020). Boiling the frog slowly: The immersion of C-Suite financial executives into fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(3), 645–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3982-3
41.
SykesG. M.MatzaD. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
42.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.876
43.
TwengeJ. M.KonrathS.FosterJ. D.CampbellW. K.BushmanB. J. (2008). Further evidence of an increase in narcissism among college students. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 919–928.
44.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660
WuW.SuY.HuangX.LiuW.JiangX. (2020). The dark triad, moral disengagement, and social entrepreneurial intention: Moderating roles of empathic concern and perspective taking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1520. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01520
47.
YoungS. M.DuF.DworkisK.OlsenK. (2016). It’s all about all of us – the rise of narcissism and its implications for management control system research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51024
48.
ŽeželjI. L.JokićB. R. (2014). Replication of experiments evaluating impact of psychological distance on moral judgment. Social Psychology, 45(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000188
49.
ZhuS.PhangS. Y. (2024). How do lead auditor instructions influence component auditors’ evidence collection decisions? The joint influence of construal interpretations and responsibility. Contemporary Accounting Research, 41(1), 591–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12911
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
