In this study, we examine an unexplored role of supply chain analysts (SCAs), who simultaneously cover suppliers and their major customers, by investigating these analysts’ role in curbing the real earnings management (REM) activities of the firms they cover. Using a firm-year sample of Chinese A-share listed suppliers and their top five listed customers from 2008 to 2018, we find evidence that, compared with non-SCA-covered firms, firms covered by SCAs exhibit lower levels of REM, particularly lower levels of sales manipulation. Results from cross-sectional analyses suggest that the effect of SCAs on REM is more pronounced when the covered firms are suppliers, and when suppliers and their customers belong to the same industry. This implies that the effect of SCAs on REM is greater when SCAs’ monitoring ability is stronger. In terms of firms’ likelihood of REM (i.e., SCAs’ monitoring opportunity), the effect is stronger for firms with stronger incentives for REM and for firms operating in poorer governance environments. Collectively, our findings suggest that SCAs presumably play an important monitoring role in constraining corporate real earnings manipulation.
AhearneM. J.BoichukJ. P.ChapmanC. J.SteenburghT. J. (2016). Real earnings management in sales. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(5), 1233–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12134
2.
BowenR. M.DuCharmeL.ShoresD. (1995). Stakeholders’ implicit claims and accounting method choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 255–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)00404-1
3.
CenL.ChenF.HouY.RichardsonG. D. (2018). Strategic disclosures of litigation loss contingencies when customer-supplier relationships are at risk. The Accounting Review, 93(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51869
4.
CenL.HanY.HarfordJ. (2024). What do questions reveal? Skill acquisition, detection, and recognition in the capital markets. Working paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3730815
5.
ChamberlainG. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297110
6.
ChanA.LeeE.PetaibanlueJ.TanN. (2017). Do board interlocks motivate voluntary disclosure? Evidence from Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 48(2), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-016-0557-1
7.
ChanL. H.ChenK. C. W.TaiY. C.YangxinYu (2015). Substitution between real and accruals-based earnings management after voluntary adoption of compensation clawback provisions. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50862
ChangH.ChenH.-C.ChenJ.ReicheltK. J. (2019). Do supply chain auditors compromise? Evidence from the association of supplier aggressive revenue management and major customer dependence. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(4), 639–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x18755282
10.
ChenJ.DouY.ZouY. (2021). Information externalities of SFAS 161: Evidence from supply chains. The Accounting Review, 96(4), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2018-0578
11.
ChenT.HarfordJ.LinC. (2015). Do analysts matter for governance? Evidence from natural experiments. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.002
12.
ChenX.GongG.LuoS. (2022). Short interest and corporate investment: Evidence from supply chain partners. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(2), 1455–1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12764
13.
ChoY. J.KimY.ZangY. (2020). Information externalities and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from a major customer’s earnings announcement. The Accounting Review, 95(6), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0129
14.
ChungR.FirthM.KimJ. B. (2002). Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-1199(01)00039-6
15.
CiftciM.MashruwalaR.WeissD. (2016). Implications of cost behavior for analysts’ earnings forecasts. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51073
CohenD. A.DeyA.LysT. Z. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-sarbanes-oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 757–787. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.757
18.
CunninghamL. M.JohnsonB. A.JohnsonE. S.LisicL. L. (2020). The switch‐up: An examination of changes in earnings management after receiving SEC comment letters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 917–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12546
19.
DasS.LevineC. B.SivaramakrishnanK. (1998). Earnings predictability and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. Accounting Review, 73(2), 277–294.
20.
DechowP. M.SchrandC. M. (2004). Earnings quality. CFA Digest, 34(4), 82–85.
DegeorgeF.DingY.JeanjeanT.StolowyH. (2013). Analyst coverage, earnings management and financial development: An international study. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.10.003
23.
DhaliwalD.MichasP. N.NaikerV.SharmaD. (2020). Greater reliance on major customers and auditor going-concern opinions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(1), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12551
24.
DhaliwalD. S.RadhakrishnanS.TsangA.YangY. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10218
ErtimurY.LivnatJ.MartikainenM. (2003). Differential market reactions to revenue and expense surprises. Review of Accounting Studies, 8(2/3), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024409311267
27.
EvansM. E.HoustonR. W.PetersM. F.PrattJ. H. (2015). Reporting regulatory environments and earnings management: U.S. and non-U.S. firms using U.S. GAAP or IFRS. The Accounting Review, 90(5), 1969–1994. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51008
28.
EwertR.WagenhoferA. (2005). Economic effects of tightening accounting standards to restrict earnings management. The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1101–1124. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.4.1101
29.
FrancisJ. R.WangW. (2021). Common auditors and private bank loans. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 793–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12617
30.
GongG.LuoS. (2018). Lenders’ experience with borrowers’ major customers and the debt contracting demand for accounting conservatism. The Accounting Review, 93(5), 187–222. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52022
31.
GrahamJ. R.HarveyC. R.RajgopalS. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3), 3–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
HeJ.LiL.YeungP. E. (2020). Two tales of monitoring: Effects of institutional cross-blockholding on accruals. Working paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3152044
34.
HeJ. J.HuangJ.ZhaoS. (2019). Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(2), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.07.019
35.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
36.
HertzelM. G.LiZ.OfficerM. S.RodgersK. J. (2008). Inter-firm linkages and the wealth effects of financial distress along the supply chain. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.01.005
37.
HillM. S.RuchG. W.TaylorG. K. (2019). Research and development expense and analyst forecast errors: An underestimation of sales or overestimation of expenses?Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x18799003
38.
HuangA.LinA.ZangA. (2022). Cross-industry information sharing among colleagues and analyst research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 74(1), 101496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101496
39.
HuiK. W.KlasaS.YeungP. E. (2012). Corporate suppliers and customers and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1/2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.11.007
40.
HwangB.-H.LibertiJ. M.SturgessJ. (2019). Information sharing and spillovers: Evidence from financial analysts. Management Science, 65(8), 3624–3636. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2986
41.
IraniR. M.OeschD. (2016). Analyst coverage and real earnings management: Quasi-experimental evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(2), 589–627. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109016000156
42.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
43.
JongA.MertensG.PoelM.DijkR. (2014). How does earnings management influence investor’s perceptions of firm value? Survey evidence from financial analysts. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(2), 606–627.
44.
JungB.SunK. J.YangY. S. (2012). Do financial analysts add value by facilitating more effective monitoring of firms’ activities?Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 27(1), 61–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x11409144
45.
KangJ.-K.LuoJ.NaH. S. (2018). Are institutional investors with multiple blockholdings effective monitors?Journal of Financial Economics, 128(3), 576–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.005
46.
KeB.YuY. (2006). The effect of issuing biased earnings forecasts on analysts’ access to management and survival. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(5), 965–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2006.00221.x
47.
KeungE. C. (2010). Do supplementary sales forecasts increase the credibility of financial analysts’ earnings forecasts?The Accounting Review, 85(6), 2047–2074. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.6.2047
48.
KimM.Prather-KinseyJ. (2010). An additional source of financial analysts’ earnings forecast errors: Imperfect adjustments for cost behavior. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 25(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x1002500102
49.
KimY.ParkM. S. (2014). Real activities manipulation and auditors’ client-retention decisions. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 367–401. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50586
LennoxC. S.FrancisJ. R.WangZ. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10195
52.
LuoS.NagarajanN. J. (2015). Information complementarities and supply chain analysts. The Accounting Review, 90(5), 1995–2029. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51011
53.
MacCormackA.VergantiR.IansitiM. (2001). Developing products on “internet time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Science, 47(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.133.10663
MusluV.MutluS. S.RadhakrishnanS.TsangA. (2019). Corporate social responsibility report narratives and analyst forecast accuracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1119–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3429-7
56.
O’BrienP. C.McnicholsM. F.LinH. (2005). Analyst impartiality and investment banking relationships. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(4), 623–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00184.x
57.
OlsenC.DietrichJ. R. (1985). Vertical information transfers: The association between retailers’ sales announcements and suppliers’ security returns. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(3), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490695
58.
PanditS.WasleyC. E.ZachT. (2011). Information externalities along the supply chain: The economic determinants of suppliers’ stock price reaction to their customers’ earnings announcements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1304–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01092.x
59.
RamalingegowdaS.UtkeS.YuY. (2021). Common institutional ownership and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 208–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12628
60.
RandallD.DalalM. (2012). Reuters. With Green Mountain, one analyst had it right.
SkinnerD. J.SloanR. G. (2002). Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don’t let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2/3), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020294523516
63.
SonB.-G.SodhiM.Kocabasoglu-HillmerC.LeeT.-H. (2016). Supply chain information in analyst reports on publicly traded companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(Part 3), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.011
64.
TangF.EllerC. K.WierB. (2016). Reporting frequency and presentation format: Detecting real activities manipulation. Journal of Information Systems, 30(3), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51284
65.
TsangA.WangK. T.WuY.LeeJ. (2024). Nonfinancial corporate social responsibility reporting and firm value: International evidence on the role of financial analysts. European Accounting Review, 33(2), 399–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2094435
66.
WangB. Y.DuanM.LiuG. (2021). Does the power gap between a chairman and CEO matter? Evidence from corporate debt financing in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 65(2), 101495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101495
ZangA. Y. (2012). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 675–703. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10196
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
