Prior research indicates that the CEO has a significant impact on financial reporting decisions. However, there is limited research on the implications of CEO succession origin (hiring a CEO from the inside as opposed to from the outside) for auditors. We find that on average, audit fees are greater by about 8% when a CEO is hired from the outside than when a CEO is promoted from within. We also find that the CEO’s in-house experience (the number of years the CEO has worked in the firm before becoming the CEO) is negatively associated with audit fees, suggesting that the CEO’s in-house experience enhances the CEO’s competence in understanding how the firm’s performance should map into the financial statements, resulting in lower audit risk. Finally, our findings suggest that the CEO’s in-house experience plays an important role in mitigating audit risk in firms with poor corporate governance quality.
BeattyR. P.ZajacE. J. (1987). CEO change and firm performance in large corporations: Succession effects and manager effects. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 305-318.
5.
BellT. B.LandsmanW. R.ShackelfordD. A. (2001). Auditors’ perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 35-43.
6.
BiggerstaffL.CiceroD. C.PuckettA. (2015). Suspect CEOs, unethical culture, and corporate misbehavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 117, 98-121.
7.
BillsK.LisicL.SeidelT. (2016). Do CEO succession and succession planning affect stakeholders’ perceptions of financial reporting risk? Evidence from audit fees. The Accounting Review, 92(4), 27-52.
8.
CainM. D.McKeonS. B. (2014). CEO personal risk-taking and corporate policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51, 130-164.
ChenY.GulF. A.VeeraraghavanM.ZolotoyL. (2015). Executive equity risk-taking incentives and audit pricing. The Accounting Review, 90, 2205-2234.
11.
ChungK.RogersR.LubatkinM.OwersJ. (1987). Do insiders make better CEOs than outsiders?The Academy of Management Executive, 1, 323-329.
12.
ClaytonM. C.HartzellJ. C.RosenbergJ. (2005). The impact of CEO turnover on equity volatility. Journal of Business, 78, 1779-1808.
13.
CohenJ. R.GaynorL. M.KrishnamoorthyG.WrightA. M. (2011). The impact on auditor judgments of CEO influence on audit committee independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30, 129-147.
14.
ColesJ. L.DanielN.NaveenL. (2006). Managerial incentives and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 431-468.
15.
DawleyD.HoffmanJ. J.SmithA. R. (2004). Leader succession: Does gender matter?The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25, 678-690.
16.
DemerjianP.LevB.McVayS. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58, 1229-1248.
17.
FamaE.FrenchK. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153-193.
18.
FargherN.JiangA.YuY. (2014). How do auditors perceive CEO’s risk-taking incentives?Accounting & Finance, 54, 1157-1181.
19.
FengM.GeW.LuoS.ShevlinT. (2011). Why do CFOs become involved in material accounting manipulations?Journal of Accounting & Economics, 51(1-2), 21-36.
20.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C.CannellaA. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
FrancisJ.HuangA. H.RajgopalS.ZangA. Y. (2008). CEO reputation and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, 109-147.
22.
FrancisJ.PhilbrickD.SchipperK. (1994). Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 137-164.
23.
GulF. A.GoodwinJ. (2010). Short-term debt maturity structures, credit ratings and the pricing of audit services. The Accounting Review, 85, 877-909.
24.
HoganC. E.WilkinsM. S. (2008). Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies?Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, 219-242.
25.
HuangH. W.ParkerR.YanY.-C.LinY.-H. (2014). CEO turnover and audit pricing. Accounting Horizons, 28, 297-312.
26.
HuangH. W.Rose-GreenE.LeeC.-C. (2012). CEO age and financial reporting quality. Accounting Horizons, 26, 725-740.
27.
HusonM. R.MalatestaP. H.ParrinoR. (2004). Managerial succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 273-275.
28.
JenterD.KanaanF. (2015). CEO turnover and relative performance evaluation. The Journal of Finance, 70, 2155-2184.
29.
JongjaroenkamolP.LauxV. (2017). Insider versus outsider CEOs, executive compensation, and accounting manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63, 253-261.
30.
KannanY. H.SkantzT. R.HiggsJ. L. (2014). The impact of CEO and CFO equity incentives on audit scope and perceived risks as revealed through audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33, 111-139.
31.
KotterJ. (1982). General managers are not generalists. Organizational Dynamics, 10, 5-19.
32.
KrishnanG. V.VisvanathanG. (2009). Do auditors price audit committee’s expertise? The case of accounting vs. non-accounting financial experts. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 24, 115-144.
33.
KrishnanG. V.WangC. (2015). The relation between managerial ability and audit fees and going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34, 139-160.
34.
LarckerD. F.RichardsonS. A. (2004). Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 625-658.
35.
LoboG. J.ZhaoY. (2013). Relation between audit effort and financial report misstatements: Evidence from quarterly and annual restatements. The Accounting Review, 88, 1385-1412.
36.
LoebbeckeJ. K.EiningM. M.WillinghamJ. J. (1989). Auditors’ experience with material irregularities: Frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(1), 1-28.
37.
MillerD. (1993). Some organizational consequences of CEO succession. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 644-659.
38.
NeterJ.WassermanW.KutnerM. (1989). Applied linear regression models. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
39.
PrattJ.SticeJ. D. (1994). The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence, and the recommended audit fees. The Accounting Review, 69, 639-656.
40.
QuigleyT. J.HambrickD. C. (2012). When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 834-859.
41.
QuigleyT. J.HambrickD. C. (2015). Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 821-830.
42.
ReinganumM. R. (1985). The effect of executive succession on stockholder wealth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 46-60.
43.
RijsenbiltA.CommandeurH. (2013). Narcissus enters the courtroom: CEO narcissism and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 413-429.
44.
ShenW.CannellaA. A. (2002). Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. The Academy of Management Journal, 45, 717-733.
45.
SimunicD. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 161-190.
WallaceW.KreutzfeldtR. (1995). The relation of inherent and control risks to audit adjustments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 10, 459-484.
48.
WeisbachM. S. (1995). CEO turnover and the firm’s investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 37, 159-188.
49.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
50.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817-838.
51.
WysockiP. (2010). Corporate compensation policies and audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49, 155-166.
52.
ZajacE. J. (1990). CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 217-230.
53.
ZhangY.RajagopalanN. (2004). When the known devil is better than an unknown god: An empirical study of the antecedents and consequences of relay CEO successions. The Academy of Management Journal, 47, 483-500.
