We analyze firms that disclose both compensation and performance peers. We find that more than half of these peers serve a dual benchmarking function, and we refer to these peers as “dual-role” peers. We find that dual-role peers are associated with higher executive pay, lower performance levels, and diminished pay-for-performance sensitivity. These findings are consistent with opportunistic peer selection. To quantify the extent of opportunistic peer selection employed by firms utilizing dual-role peers, we introduce a novel firm-level peer selection index (PSI). We find that firms with a higher PSI tend to offer higher CEO compensation but experience poorer stock performance in the future. Furthermore, supplementary evidence suggests that CEO influence exacerbates the prevalence of such opportunistic peer selection, aligning with the opportunism hypothesis. Our evidence shows that many firms have the capability to select peer firms demonstrating low performance yet commanding high executive compensation. Collectively, these findings underscore the prevalence of managerial opportunism in the peer selection process for dual benchmarks.
AbernethyM.KuangY.QinB. (2015). Influence of CEO power on compensation contract design. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1265–1306. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50971
BankerR. D.DarroughM. N.HuangR.Plehn-DujowichJ. M. (2013). The relation between CEO compensation and past performance. The Accounting Review, 88(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50274
5.
BankerR. D.HuangR.NatarajanR. (2009). Incentive contracting and value relevance of earnings and cash flows. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(3), 647–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2009.00335.x
6.
BannisterJ.NewmanH. (2003). Analysis of corporate disclosures on relative performance evaluation. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.235
7.
BebchukL. A.FriedJ. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003769204362
8.
BebchukL. A.FriedJ. M. (2004). Pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Harvard Business Press.
9.
BebchukL. A.FriedJ. M.WalkerD. I. (2002). Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation. University of Chicago Law Review, 69(3), 751–846. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600632
10.
BebchukL. A.GrinsteinY. (2005). The growth of executive pay. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri017
11.
BizjakJ.KalpathyS.LiZ.YoungB. (2022). The choice of peers for relative performance evaluation in executive compensation. Review of Finance, 26(5), 1217–1239. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac016
12.
BizjakJ.LemmonM.NaveenL. (2008). Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation?Journal of Financial Economics, 90(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.08.007
13.
BizjakJ.LemmonM.NguyenT. (2011). Are all CEOs above average? An empirical analysis of compensation peer groups and pay design. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 538–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.007
14.
BloomfieldM. (2021). Compensation disclosures and strategic commitment: Evidence from revenue-based pay. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 620–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.04.006
15.
BloomfieldM.GipperB.KeplerJ.TsuiD. (2021). Cost shielding in executive bonus plans. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 72(2–3), Article 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101428
16.
BushmanR. (2021). Cash-based bonus plans as a strategic communication, coordination and commitment mechanism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 72(2–3), Article 101447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101447
17.
BushmanR.EngelE.SmithA. (2006). An analysis of the relation between the stewardship and valuation roles of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2006.00192.x
18.
CadmanB.CarterM. (2014). Compensation peer groups and their relation with CEO pay. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50598
19.
CadmanB.CarterM.HillegeistS. (2010). The incentives of compensation consultants on CEO pay. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.03.002
20.
CadmanB.CarterM.PengX. (2021). The participation constraint and CEO equity grants. The Accounting Review, 96(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0692
21.
CarterM.IttnerC.ZechmanS. (2009). Explicit relative performance evaluation in performance-vested equity grants. Review of Accounting Studies, 14(2-3), 269–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-009-9085-8
22.
ComprixJ.MullerK. A. (2006). Asymmetric treatment of reported pension expense and income amounts in CEO cash compensation calculations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 385–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.12.002
DenisD.JochemT.RajamaniA. (2019). Shareholder governance and CEO compensation: The peer effects of say on pay. Review of Financial Studies, 33(7), 3130–3173. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz104
FaulkenderM.YangJ. (2010). Inside the black box: The role and composition of compensation peer groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.01.006
GaverJ.GaverK. (1998). The relation between nonrecurring accounting transactions and CEO cash compensation. The Accounting Review, 73(2), 235–253.
29.
GompersP.IshiiJ.MetrickA. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–155. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162
30.
GongG.LiL.ShinJ. (2011). Relative performance evaluation and related peer groups in executive compensation contracts. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 1007–1043. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000042
31.
GuayW.KeplerJ.TsuiD. (2019). The role of executive cash bonuses in providing individual and team incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), 441–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.02.007
32.
HolmstromB.KaplanS. (2003). The state of U.S. Corporate governance: what’s right and what’s wrong?The Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 15(3), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2003.tb00457.x
33.
MarshallR.LeeL. (2016). Are CEOs paid for performance? Evaluating the effectiveness of equity incentives. MSCI ESG Research.
MurphyK. (2013). Executive compensation: Where we are, and how we got there. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance (4, pp. 211–356). Elsevier Science North Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-44-453594-8.00004-5
36.
MurphyK.SandinoT. (2010). Executive pay and “independent” compensation consultants. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.12.001
37.
MurphyK.ZabojnikJ. (2004). CEO pay and appointments: A market-based explanation for recent trends. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302262
38.
RajgopalS.ShevlinT.ZamoraV. (2006). CEO’s outside employment opportunities and the lack of relative performance evaluation in compensation contracts. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1813–1844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00890.x
