Using dual signature audit opinions, we investigate whether audit quality differs between staggered and simultaneous audit partner rotations. Compared to audits without partner rotations, we find partial support that staggered rotations are positively associated with audit quality and strong support that simultaneous rotations are negatively associated with audit quality. When directly comparing these rotation types, staggered rotations are consistently associated with higher audit quality than simultaneous rotations. The effects on audit quality are concentrated in the first year after rotations occur. The negative impact of simultaneous rotations is mitigated when an incoming partner has industry expertise. We perform exploratory tests on various staggered rotation types and examine a determinants model to understand the driving forces of staggered versus simultaneous rotations.
ArelB.BrodyR. G.PanyK. (2005). Audit firm rotation and audit quality. The CPA Journal, 75(1), 36–39.
2.
BamberE. M.BamberL. S. (2009). Discussion of mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: Evidence from taiwan. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.2.3
3.
BamberE. M.IyerV. M. (2007). Auditor’s identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.2.1
4.
BasuS. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(97)00014-1
5.
BeazleyH.BoenischJ.HardenD. (2002). Continuity management: Preserving corporate knowledge and productivity when employees leave. John Wiley and Sons.
6.
BedardJ. C.DeisD. R.CurtisM. B.JenkinsJ. G. (2008). Risk monitoring and control in audit firms: A research synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(1), 187–218. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.187
7.
BedardJ. C.JohnstoneK. M. (2010). Audit partner tenure and audit planning and pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.45
8.
BianchiP. A. (2018). Auditors’ joint engagements and audit quality: Evidence from Italian private companies. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(3), 1533–1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12327
9.
CameranM.DitilloA.PettinicchioA. (2018). Audit team attributes matter: How diversity affects audit quality. European Accounting Review, 27(4), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1307131
ChenC. Y.LinC. J.LinY. C. (2008). Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality?Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 415–445. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.2.5
12.
ChenF.PengS.XueS.YangZ.YeF. (2016). Do audit clients successfully engage in opinion shopping? Partner-Level evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12097
13.
ChengC. S.WangK.XuY.ZhangN. (2020). The impact of revealing auditor partner quality: Evidence from a long panel. Review of Accounting Studies, 25(4), 1475–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09537-w
14.
ChiW.HuangH.LiaoY.XieH. (2009). Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 359–391. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.2.2
15.
ChiW.MyersL. A.OmerT. C.XieH. (2017). The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(1), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-016-9376-9
16.
China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and Ministry of Finance of The People’s Republic of China (MOF). (2003). Regulations on mandatory rotations of signing auditors of public companies. (in Chinese).
17.
ChristensenB. E.GloverS. M.OmerT. C.ShelleyM. K. (2016). Understanding audit quality: Insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1648–1684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12212
18.
ChristensenB. E.NewtonN. J.WilkinsM. S. (2021). How do team workloads and team staffing affect the audit? Archival evidence from U.S. audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92(1), Article 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101225
19.
CunninghamL.LiC.SteinS.WrightN. (2019). What’s in a Name? Initial Evidence of U.S. Audit Partner Identification Using Difference-in-Differences Analyses. The Accounting Review, 94(5), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52305
20.
DaughertyB.DickinsD.HatfieldR.HiggsJ. (2012). An examination of partner perceptions of partner rotation: Direct and indirect consequences to audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10193
DechowP. M.DichevI. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
23.
DeFondM. L.JiambalvoJ. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1-2), 145–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90008-6
24.
DeFondM. L.WongT. J.LiS. (1999). The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(3), 269–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(00)00005-7
DirsmithM. W.CovaleskiM. A. (1985). Informal communications, nonformal communications and mentoring in public accounting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90013-3
27.
DodgsonM. K.AgogliaC. P.BennettG. B.CohenJ. R. (2020). Managing the auditor-client relationship through partner rotations: The experiences of audit firm partners. The Accounting Review, 95(2), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52556
28.
EppsK. K.MessierW. F. (2007). Engagement quality reviews: A comparison of audit firm practices. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.2.167
GilbertM.Cordey-HayesM. (1996). Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation. Technovation, 16(6), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(96)00012-0
33.
GipperB.HailL.LeuzC. (2021). On the economics of mandatory audit partner rotation and tenure: Evidence from PCAOB data. The Accounting Review, 96(2), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2018-0347
34.
GohS. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210417664
35.
GulF. A.FungS. Y. K.JaggiB. (2009). Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors’ industry expertise. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.03.001
36.
GulF. A.WuD.YangZ. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993–2023. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50536
37.
HailL.LangM.LeuzC. (2020). Reproducibility in accounting research: Views of the research community. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12305
38.
HainmuellerJ. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr025
39.
HuangH.RaghunandanK.HuangT. C.ChiouJ. R. (2015). Fee discounting and audit quality following audit firm and audit partner changes: Chinese evidence. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1517–1546. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50958
40.
IttonenK.TrønnesP. C. (2015). Benefits and costs of appointing joint audit engagement partners. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(3), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50934
41.
KalkanV. (2006). Knowledge Continuity Management Process in Organizations. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 4(3), 41–46.
42.
KinneyW. R.MartinR. D. (1994). Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit-related adjustment studies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13(1), 149–156.
43.
KothariS. P.LeoneA.WasleyC. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
44.
KuangH.LiH.SherwoodM. G.WhitedR. (2020). Mandatory audit partner rotations and audit quality in the United States. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-18-152
45.
KwonS. Y.LimY.SimnettR. (2014). The effect of mandatory audit firm rotation on audit quality and audit fees: Empirical evidence from the Korean audit market. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 167–196. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50814
46.
LarckerD. F.RusticusT. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004
47.
LaurionH.LawrenceA.RyansJ. (2017). U.S. Audit partner rotations. The Accounting Review, 92(3), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51552
48.
LennoxC. S.WangC.WuX. (2020). Opening up the “black box” of audit firms: The effects of audit partner ownership on audit adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(5), 1299–1341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12333
49.
LennoxC. S.WuX. (2018). A review of the archival literature on audit partners. Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51942
50.
LennoxC. S.WuX. (2022). Mandatory internal control audits, audit adjustments, and financial reporting quality: Evidence from China. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2020-0152
51.
LennoxC. S.WuX.ZhangT. (2014). Does mandatory rotation of audit partners improve audit quality?The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1775–1803. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50800
52.
LibbyR.LuftJ. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-d
53.
LittB.SharmaD. S.SimpsonT.TanyiP. N. (2014). Audit partner rotation and financial reporting quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(3), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50753
54.
MajorE.Cordey-HayesM. (2000). Knowledge translation: A new perspective on knowledge transfer and foresight. Foresight, 2(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680010802762
55.
ManryD. L.MockT. J.TurnerJ. L. (2008). Does increased audit partner tenure reduce audit quality?Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23(4), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x0802300406
56.
MarkusL. M. (2001). Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 57–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045671
57.
MatsumuraE. M.TuckerR. R. (1995). Second partner review: An analytical model. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 10(1), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x9501000113
Ministry of Finance of The People’s Republic of China (MOF). (2003). Notice concerning certified public accountants’ signature and seal on audit reports. (in Chinese).
60.
MonroeG.HossainS. (2013). Does audit quality improve after the implementation of mandatory audit partner rotation?Accounting and Management Information Systems, 12(2), 263–279. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/310525
61.
MyersJ. N.MyersL. A.OmerT. C. (2003). Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation?The Accounting Review, 78(3), 779–799. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.779
62.
NelsonM. W.ElliottJ. A.TarpleyR. L. (2002). Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors’ earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 175–202. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.175
63.
NewtonN. J.WangD.WilkinsM. S. (2013). Does a lack of choice lead to lower quality? Evidence from auditor competition and client restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(3), 31–67. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50461
64.
PetersenM. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053
65.
PrattJ.JiambalvoJ. (1981). Relationships between leader behaviors and audit team performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(81)90003-9
66.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2011). Concept release on auditor independence and audit firm rotation. PCAOB.
ReidL. C.CarcelloJ. V. (2017). Investor reaction to the prospect of mandatory audit firm rotation. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51488
69.
Ruiz-BarbadilloE.Gomez-AguilarN.CarreraN. (2009). Does mandatory audit firm rotation enhance auditor independence? Evidence from Spain. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.1.113
70.
SandersC. B.StewardM. D.BridgesS. (2009). Facilitating knowledge transfer during SOX-mandated audit partner rotation. Business Horizons, 52(6), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.07.004
71.
SharmaD. S.TanyiP. N.LittB. A. (2017). Costs of mandatory periodic audit partner rotation: Evidence from audit fees and audit timeliness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51515
72.
ShipmanJ. E.SwanquistQ. T.WhitedR. L. (2017). Propensity score matching in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 213–244. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51449
73.
SkinnerD. J. (1994). Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491386
74.
SrinidhiB.YangZ.ZhangK. Y. (2019). Gender diversity and audit quality: Evidence from audit partner pairing. Working paper, University of Texas at Arlington, Stony Brook University, and Monash University. Available at SSRN 3025235.
75.
ThibodeauJ. C. (2003). The development and transferability of task knowledge. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.1.47
Vera-MunozS. C.HoJ. L.ChowC. W. (2006). Enhancing knowledge sharing in public accounting firms. Accounting Horizons, 20(2), 133–155.
78.
WangQ.WongT. J.XiaL. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 112–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.04.001
79.
WangY.YuL.ZhaoY. (2015). The association between audit-partner quality and engagement quality: Evidence from financial report misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(3), 81–111. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50954
80.
WildeJ. H. (2017). The deterrent effect of employee whistleblowing on firms’ financial misreporting and tax aggressiveness. The Accounting Review, 92(5), 247–280. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51661
