We examine whether political forces in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) influence audit reporting, specifically the disclosure of Key Audit Matters (KAMs). We test two competing predictions that offer alternative explanations for the relation between SOEs and KAMs disclosure. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms and controlling for related determinants of KAMs reporting, we document that, compared to non-SOEs, SOEs have fewer abnormal KAMs (relative to their industry peers). SOEs are also more likely to avoid the disclosure of expected KAMs, especially in the subject areas of inventory, revenue and related party transactions (RPTs). Taken together, results suggest that SOEs have strong political motives and power to obscure transparency and withhold potentially costly news. In line with this conjecture, we show that the aforementioned effects are more pronounced when SOEs have more concentrated state ownership, operate in industries of strategic importance to the state, or are involved in tunneling RPTs. Supplementary analysis indicates that SOEs have less extensive KAMs disclosures and auditor responses, which moreover are less risk-oriented. Overall, our study provides new evidence on how state control and related institutional factors affect audit practices.
AbdelfattahT.ElmahgoubM.ElamerA. A. (2020). Female audit partners and extended audit reporting: UK evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(1), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04607-0
2.
AharonyJ.LeeC. W. J.WongT. J. (2000). Financial packaging of IPO firms in China. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672924
3.
BaiC.-E.LiuQ.SongF. M. (2005). Bad news is good news: Propping and tunnelling evidence from China. University of Hong Kong, Working paper.
4.
BédardJ.Gonthier-BesacierN.SchattA. (2018). Consequences of expanded audit reports: Evidence from the justifications of assessments in France. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(3), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52339
5.
Beijing Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2018). Expert tips from the Professional Technical Committee of the Beijing Institute of Certified Public Accountants [2018] No. 9- Issues to be concerned about in determining and communicating key audit matters. https://bicpa.org.cn/p1/tzgg/20181101/45397.html
6.
BortolottiB.FaccioM. (2009). Government control of privatized firms. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 2907–2939. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn077
7.
BradshawM.LiaoG.MaM. S. (2019). Agency costs and tax planning when the government is a major shareholder. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(2–3), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.10.002
8.
BurkeJ.HoitashR.HoitashU.XiaoS. (2023). The disclosure and consequences of U.S. critical audit matters. The Accounting Review, 98(2), 59–95. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2021-0013
9.
BushmanR. M.PiotroskiJ. D. (2006). Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1–2), 107–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.10.005
10.
Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. (2003). Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on some issues concerning the improvement of the socialist market economy.
11.
ChanK. H.LinK. Z.MoP. L. L. (2006). A political–economic analysis of auditor reporting and auditor switches. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-6394-z
12.
ChanK. H.LinK. Z.WangR. R. (2012). Government ownership, accounting-based regulations, and the pursuit of favorable audit opinions: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50227
13.
ChangC.ChenX.LiaoG. (2014). What are the reliably important determinants of capital structure in China?Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 30, 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.06.001
14.
ChangY. T.ChiW.StoneD. N. (2024). Is client-specific information useful to investors? Evidence from key audit matter reports. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 39(3), 786–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x221091804
15.
ChenC. J.SuX.ZhaoR.KongC. U. o. H. (2000). An emerging market’s reaction to initial modified audit opinions: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(3), 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1092/gcjp-5599-quwb-g86d
16.
ChenH.ChenJ. Z.LoboG. J.WangY. (2010). Association between borrower and lender state ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(5), 973–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2010.00385.x
17.
ChenX.ChengQ.HaoY.LiuQ. (2020). GDP growth incentives and earnings management: Evidence from China. Review of Accounting Studies, 25(3), 1002–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09547-8
18.
CheungY. L.JingL.LuT.RauP. R.StouraitisA. (2009). Tunneling and propping up: An analysis of related party transactions by Chinese listed companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(3), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2008.10.001
19.
China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). (2017). Circular of the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council on Several Issues Concerning the Standardization of Capital Exchanges between Listed Companies and Related Parties and the External Guarantees of Listed Companies. (In Chinese). https://www.csrc.gov.cn/tibet/c105486/c1304233/content.shtml
20.
Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (CICPA). (2016). Auditing Standard No. 1504 for Certified Public Accountants of China - Communication on Key Audit Matters in Audit Reports. (In Chinese). https://www.cicpa.org.cn/xxfb/news/201612/W020210118390501351623.pdf
21.
ChristensenB. E.GloverS. M.WolfeC. J. (2014). Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors’ decision to invest?Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50793
22.
DennisS. A.GriffinJ. B.ZehmsK. M. (2019). The value relevance of managers’ and auditors’ disclosures about material measurement uncertainty. The Accounting Review, 94(4), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52272
23.
DuF.TangG.YoungS. M. (2012). Influence activities and favoritism in subjective performance evaluation: Evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1555–1588. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50196
24.
FanJ. P. H.WongT. J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(02)00047-2
25.
FangJ.LoboG. J.ZhangY.ZhaoY. (2018). Auditing related party transactions: Evidence from audit opinions and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(2), 73–106. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51768
GohB. W.LiD.WangM. (2023). Informativeness of the expanded audit report: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. forthcoming.
28.
GuedhamiO.PittmanJ. A.SaffarW. (2009). Auditor choice in privatized firms: Empirical evidence on the role of state and foreign owners. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2–3), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.003
29.
GuedhamiO.PittmanJ. A.SaffarW. (2014). Auditor choice in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 107–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12032
GulF. A.KimJ. B.QiuA. A. (2010). Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.11.005
32.
GulF. A.SamiH.ZhouH. (2009). Auditor disaffiliation program in China and auditor independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.1.29
33.
GutierrezE.Minutti-MezaM.TatumK. W.VulchevaM. (2018). Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(4), 1543–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-018-9464-0
34.
HabibA.JiangH.ZhouD. (2015). Related party transactions and audit fees: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting Research, 14(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51020
35.
HainmuellerJ. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr025
36.
HeK.PanX.TianG. G. (2017). Political connections, audit opinions, and auditor choice: Evidence from the ouster of government officers. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(3), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51668
37.
HeK.PanX.TianG. G.WuY.CaiC. (2022a). How does reciprocal rent-seeking between politicians and auditors influence audit quality? Evidence from China. Accounting Horizons, 36(3), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-19-118
38.
HeC.LiY. X.LiQ. C.DingC. C. (2022b). Research on corporate multinational investment decisions from the perspective of uncertainty perception (an textual analysis based on listed firms’ annual reports). World Economy Studies, 7(59–75), 136.
39.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
JiaN.ShiJ.WangY. (2013). Coinsurance within business groups: Evidence from related party transactions in an emerging market. Management Science, 59(10), 2295–2313. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1703
JiangG.LeeC. M.YueH. (2010). Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.05.002
JinX.XuL.XinY.AdhikariA. (2022). Political governance in China’s state-owned enterprises. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15(2), Article 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100236
KlevakJ.LivnatJ.PeiD. S.SuslavaK. (2023). Critical audit matters: Possible market misinterpretation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 42(3), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2020-113
48.
KothariS. P.LeoneA. J.WasleyC. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
49.
LennoxC.WuJ. S. (2022). A review of China-related accounting research in the past 25 years. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 74(2–3), Article 101539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101539
50.
LennoxC.WuX.ZhangT. (2016). The effect of audit adjustments on earnings quality: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(2–3), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.08.003
51.
LennoxC. S.FrancisJ. R.WangZ. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10195
52.
LennoxC. S.SchmidtJ. J.ThompsonA. M. (2023). Why are expanded audit reports not informative to investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(2), 497–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09650-4
53.
LiH.ZhouL.-A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009
LiaoL.Minutti-MezaM.ZhangY.ZouY. (2022). Consequences of the adoption of the expanded auditor’s report: Evidence from Hong Kong. University of Miami Business School Research Paper, No. 3392449.
56.
LinK. J.LuX.ZhangJ.ZhengY. (2020). State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2019.12.001
57.
LiuC.WangJ. Q.QiuM. Q. (2022). Research on the impact of risk information disclosure of customers’ annual report on cash holding decisions of enterprises. Chinese Journal of Management, 19(12), 1863–1873. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GLXB202212015.htm
58.
LiuQ.LuZ. J. (2007). Corporate governance and earnings management in the Chinese listed companies: A tunneling perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 881–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.07.003
59.
MilhauptC. J.PargendlerM. (2018). Related party transactions in state-owned enterprises: Tunneling, propping, and policy channeling. In The Law and Finance of Related Party Transactions. Cambridge University Press.
NPC. (2020). The state council’s decision on the supervision of enterprises in the state owned assets supervision system for the year 2019 special report on the management of state-owned assets—At the 22nd meeting of the Standing Committee of the 13th National People’s Congress on October 15, 2020(In Chinese).
63.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). The size and sectoral distribution of SOEs in OECD and partner countries. OECD Publishing.
64.
PiotroskiJ. D.WongT. J. (2012). Institutions and information environment of Chinese listed firms. In Capitalizing China (pp. 201–246). University of Chicago Press.
65.
PiotroskiJ. D.WongT. J.ZhangT. (2015). Political incentives to suppress negative information: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 405–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12071
RajanR. G.ZingalesL. (2003). The great reversals: The politics of financial development in the twentieth century. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 5–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(03)00125-9
68.
RapleyE. T.RobertsonJ. C.SmithJ. L. (2021). The effects of disclosing critical audit matters and auditor tenure on nonprofessional investors’ judgments. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(5), Article 106847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106847
69.
ReidL. C.CarcelloJ. V.LiC.NealT. L.FrancisJ. R. (2019). Impact of auditor report changes on financial reporting quality and audit costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), 1501–1539. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12486
70.
Sierra-GarcíaL.GambettaN.García-BenauM. A.Orta-PérezM. (2019). Understanding the determinants of the magnitude of entity-level risk and account-level risk key audit matters: The case of the United Kingdom. The British Accounting Review, 51(3), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.02.004
71.
State Council of the People's Republic of China. (2020). Opinion on speeding up the improvement of the socialist market economy in the new era.
72.
SunD. J.LiJ. Q. (2024). Analysis of the problem of capital occupation by major shareholders of the company - based on the perspective of investor protection. Times of Economy & Trade, 572(9), 132–134. http://www.sdjmqk.com.cn/qikan_detail.asp?id=8576
WangL.WangQ. K. (2023). The contagion of firm’s perception of economic policy uncertainty: Based on the textual analysis of annual reports and interlocking board networks. China Journal of Econometrics, 3(2), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.12012/CJoE2022-0085
75.
WangQ.WongT. J.XiaL. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 112–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.04.001
76.
WangX. Y.ZengJ. (2019). Risk disclosure in annual reports and bank loan interest rate. Journal of Financial Research, 463(1), 54–71. http://www.jryj.org.cn/EN/Y2019/V463/I1/54
77.
WeiC. (2021). State ownership and target setting: Evidence from publicly listed companies in China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 1925–1960. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12665
78.
WeiM.CaiG.LiuJ. (2017). Research on governance of Chinese state-owned listed companies based on classification. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (SocialScience Edition), 57(4), 175–192. in Chinese. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZSDS201704019.htm
79.
WongT. J. (2016). Corporate governance research on listed firms in China: Institutions, governance and accountability. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 9(4), 259–326. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000039
80.
YanM. M.ZhuangF. P. (2021). Analysis and evaluation of the current situation of key audit matters disclosure: Based on the experience data of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges in the first year of comprehensive implementation of the new audit report standards. Accounting and Finance Communication, 111–116+121.
81.
YangL.TangQ.KilgoreA.Yi HongJ. (2001). Auditor-government associations and auditor independence in China. The British Accounting Review, 33(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2001.0162
82.
YangZ. (2013). Do political connections add value to audit firms? Evidence from IPO audits in China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(3), 891–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01177.x
83.
ZengY.ZhangJ. H.ZhangJ.ZhangM. (2021). Key audit matters reports in China: Their descriptions and implications of audit quality. Accounting Horizons, 35(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-19-189
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
