Can a Viral Blunder Damage Auditor Brand Name Reputation? Evidence From Envelopegate

Abstract

“Envelopegate” is a term used to describe PricewaterhouseCoopers’ (PwC)’s service failure that occurred during the 2017 Academy Awards ceremony (“the Oscars”). For PwC, the error resulted in immediate and unprecedented negative publicity, which was driven by a viral response on social media and other online media platforms. Thus, Envelopegate offers a unique opportunity to observe the potential spillover effects of negative viral events on the brand name reputation of an audit firm. Using intraday and daily client stock returns, we find a significant negative market response for PwC audit clients within the first minute of trading on the day following Envelopegate. The negative market effect is driven by clients with higher demand for auditor reputation, but we find no evidence that results are driven by any specific audit market region. Thus, our research underscores the susceptibility of an audit firm’s brand value to negative viral events, even when the event is unrelated to audit services. The findings of this study should be of interest to scholars exploring how audit firms form and maintain reputations as well as to professional service firms that engage in highly visible client services as part of their strategic efforts to enhance brand value.

Keywords

viral events auditor reputation intraday returns reputation spillovers sentiment trading non-audit services

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

L. J.

Buslepp

W. L.

(2022). An investigation of the market’s pricing of auditor competence: Evidence from PwC’s Oscars blunder. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 98, Article 101310.

Acton

(2017). And the Oscar loser is…PwC apologizes for its role in best picture drama. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/27/and-the-oscar-loser-ispwc-apologizes-for-its-role-in-best-picture-drama.html

Ahn

Akamah

Shu

S. Q.

(2021). The effect of disclosing audit quality control deficiencies on non-audit tax services: Evidence from Deloitte’s 2007 PCAOB Part II inspection report. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40, Article 106820.

Baber

W. R.

Kumar

K. R.

Verghese

(1995). Client security price reactions to the Laventhol and Horwath bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 33(2), 385–395.

Barnes

(2020). Proposed settlement of age discrimination case hardly onerous for PricewaterhouseCoopers. https://www.forbes.com/sites/patriciagbarnes/2020/03/16/proposed-settlement-of-age-discrimination-case-hardly-onerous-for-pricewaterhousecoopers/?sh=7bb1aa935d7f

Baugh

Boone

J. P.

Khurana

I. K.

Raman

K. K.

(2019). Did the 2005 deferred prosecution agreement adversely impact KPMG’s audit practice? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(1), 77–102.

Berglund

N. R.

(2020). Do client bankruptcies preceded by clean audit opinions damage auditor reputation? Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(3), 1914–1951.

Bernard

V. L.

(1987). Cross-sectional dependence and problems in inference in market-based accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research, 25, 1–48.

Brivot

Gendron

Guénin

(2017). Reinventing organizational control: Meaning contest surrounding reputational risk controllability in the social media arena. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 795–820.

10.

Brown

D. L.

Shu

S. Z.

Soo

B. S.

Trompeter

G. M.

(2013). The insurance hypothesis: An examination of KPMG’s audit clients around the investigation and settlement of the tax shelter case. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(4), 1–24.

11.

Cameron

A. C.

Miller

D. L.

(2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372.

12.

Campbell

Drake

Thornock

Twedt

(2023). Earnings virality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 75(1), Article 101517.

13.

Chandra

Balachandran

B. V.

(1990). A synthesis of alternative testing procedures for event studies. Contemporary Accounting Research, 6(2), 611–640.

14.

Chaney

P. K.

Philipich

K. L.

(2002). Shredded reputation: The cost of audit failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1221–1245.

15.

Collins

D. W.

Pincus

Xie

(1999). Equity valuation and negative earnings: The role of book value of equity. The Accounting Review, 74(1), 29–61.

16.

Craswell

A. T.

Francis

J. R.

Taylor

S. L.

(1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specialization. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 297–322.

17.

Engelberg

Gao

(2011). In search of attention. Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1461–1499.

18.

Dee

C. C.

Lulseged

Zhang

(2011). Client stock market reaction to PCAOB sanctions against a Big 4 auditor. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 263–291.

19.

DeFond

Zhang

(2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2), 275–326.

20.

Dopuch

Simunic

(1982, June). Competition in auditing research: An assessment [Paper presentation]. 4th Symposium on Auditing Research, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL.

21.

Dye

R. A.

(1993). Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 887–914.

22.

Dyer

Lang

Stice-Lawrence

(2017). The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(2–3), 221–245.

23.

El Ghoul

Guedhami

Pittman

. (2016). Cross-country evidence on the importance of Big Four auditors to equity pricing: The mediating role of legal institutions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 54, 60–81.

24.

Fama

E. F.

French

K. R.

(1995). Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. Journal of Finance, 50(1), 131–155.

25.

Fama

E. F.

French

K. R.

(1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 153–193.

26.

Finlayson

(2019). PR apologies: Winners and losers. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/pr-apologies-winners-and-losers

27.

Francis

J. R.

M. D.

(2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521–1552.

28.

Gerakos

Syverson

(2015). Competition in the audit market: Policy implications. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(4), 725–775.

29.

Jia

Redigolo

Shu

Zhao

(2020). Can social media distort price discovery? Evidence from merger rumors. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 70(1), Article 101334.

30.

Kinder

(2020). Accountancy firms weigh up reputational risk of furloughing staff. https://www.ft.com/content/65d8e851-5e33-4a2d-a814-a4c27f949dd3

31.

Knittel

C. R.

Stango

(2014). Celebrity endorsements, firm value, and reputation risk: Evidence from the Tiger Woods scandal. Management Science, 60(1), 21–37.

32.

Kolari

J. W.

Pynnönen

(2010). Event study testing with cross-sectional correlation of abnormal returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(11), 3996–4025.

33.

Krishnamurthy

Zhou

(2006). Auditor reputation, auditor independence, and the stock-market impact of Andersen’s indictment on its client firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(2), 465–490.

34.

Leone

A. J.

Minutti-Meza

Wasley

C. E.

(2019). Influential observations and inference in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 94(6), 337–364.

35.

Locke

S. E.

(2017). Three simple crisis communication rules to live by (PwC just followed the playbook). https://www.commpro.biz/three-simple-crisis-communications-rules-to-live-by-pwc-just-followed-the-playbook/

36.

Loughran

McDonald

(2014). Measuring readability in financial disclosures. The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643–1671.

37.

Menon

Williams

D. D.

(1994). The insurance hypothesis and market prices. The Accounting Review, 69(2), 327–342.

38.

Nelson

K. K.

Price

R. A.

Rountree

B. R.

(2008). The market reaction to Arthur Andersen’s role in the Enron scandal: Loss of reputation or confounding effects? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(2), 279–293.

39.

Nielson Company. (2018). Tops of 2017: Television and social media. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2017/tops-of-2017-television-and-social-media.html

40.

Rapoport

(2018). How did the Big Four auditors get $17 billion in revenue growth? Not from auditing. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-did-the-big-four-auditors-get-17-billion-in-revenue-growth-not-from-auditing-1523098800

41.

Rasso

J. T.

(2014). Apology accepted: The benefits of an apology for a deficient audit following an audit failure. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(1), 161–176.

42.

Schipper

Thompson

(1983). The impact of merger-related regulations on the shareholders of acquiring firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 184–221.

43.

Simunic

D. A.

Stein

M. T.

(1987, May 22–23). On the economics of product differentiation in auditing [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 1986 Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems. University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/dl_proceedings/8/

44.

Simunic

D. A.

Stein

M. T.

(1996). Impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing, 15, 119–134.

45.

Skinner

D. J.

Srinivasan

(2012). Audit quality and auditor reputation: Evidence from Japan. The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1737–1765.

46.

Smith

(2017). #Envelopegate: How did PwC’s “Moonlight” mix-up happen at Oscars? NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/movies/envelopegate-how-did-pwc-s-moonlight-mix-happen-oscars-n726031

47.

Stephens

M. A.

(1974). EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69(347), 730–737.

48.

Swanquist

Q. T.

Whited

R. L.

(2015). Do clients avoid “contaminated” offices? The economic consequences of low-quality audits. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2537–2570.

49.

Weber

Willenborg

Zhang

(2008). Does auditor reputation matter? The case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 941–972.

50.

Zmijewski

M. E.

(1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59–82.