Our research empirically examines the relationship between tax avoidance and the likelihood of incurring a tax-related restatement, as well as the effects tax restatements have on future tax avoidance behavior. We predict and find that the association between tax avoidance and the likelihood of a tax-related restatement is nonlinear. Specifically, both relatively high levels and relatively low levels of tax avoidance compared to peer firms increase the likelihood of incurring a tax-related restatement. We consider whether the increased likelihood for high avoiders is attributable to obfuscation necessary to escape detection of tax avoidance or weak corporate governance. For high avoiders, we find evidence that both obfuscation and weak corporate governance may contribute to the likelihood of a tax-related restatement. As low avoiders should not need to obfuscate, we focus on corporate governance and find an increased likelihood when governance is weak. In response to a tax-related restatement announcement, we document a decline in tax avoidance for firms that have relatively high tax avoidance prior to the restatement announcement. We attribute this to the increased level of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) monitoring and strengthening of corporate governance that we observe post-restatement announcement. In contrast, we do not find evidence that low avoidance firms alter their tax avoidance after a tax-related restatement announcement, consistent with our finding that corporate governance does not improve post-restatement for low avoiders.
AdamsR. B.SantosJ. A. (2006). Identifying the effect of managerial control on firm performance. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 41(1/2), 55–85.
2.
AiC.NortonE. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129.
3.
AllinghamM.SandmoA. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3/4), 323–338.
4.
Amel-ZadehA.ZhangY. (2015). The economic consequences of financial restatements: Evidence from the market for corporate control. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 1–29.
5.
ArmstrongC.BlouinJ.JagolinzerA.LarckerD. (2015). Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 1–17.
6.
AustinC.WilsonR. (2017). An examination of reputational costs and tax avoidance: Evidence from firms with valuable consumer brands. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 39(1), 67–93.
7.
BaberW. R.LiangL.ZhuZ. (2012). Associations between internal and external corporate governance characteristics: Implications for investigating financial accounting restatements. Accounting Horizons, 26(2), 219–237.
8.
BalakrishnanK.BlouinJ.GuayW. (2019). Tax aggressiveness and corporate transparency. The Accounting Review, 94(1), 45–69.
9.
BauerA. (2016). Tax avoidance and the implications of weak internal controls. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 449–486.
10.
BlaylockB. (2016). Is tax avoidance associated with economically significant rent extraction among US firms?Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(3), 1013–1043.
11.
BozanicZ.HoopesJ. L.ThornockJ. R.WilliamsB. M. (2017). IRS attention. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(1), 79–114.
12.
BrickleyJ. A.ColesJ. L.JarrellG. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189–220.
13.
CarcelloJ.HermansonD.YeZ. (2011). Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: Insights, practice implications and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 1–31.
14.
CaskeyJ. (2019). Discussion of “How quickly do firms adjust to optimal levels of tax avoidance?”Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), 1855–1860.
15.
ChenH.YangD.ZhangX.ZhouN. (2020). The moderating role of internal control in tax avoidance: Evidence from a COSO-based internal control index in China. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 42(1), 23–55.
16.
ChoudharyP.KoesterA.ShevlinT. (2016). Measuring income tax accrual quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(1), 89–139.
17.
ChyzJ.GaertnerF. (2018). Can paying “too much” or “too little” tax contribute to forced CEO turnover?The Accounting Review, 93(1), 102–130.
18.
CohenJ.KrishnamoorthyG.WrightA. (2004). The corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23(1), 87–152.
DeFondM.ErkensD. H.ZhangJ. (2017). Do client characteristics really drive the Big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Science, 63(11), 3628–3649.
21.
DeloitteL. L. P. (2008). Material weaknesses and restatements: Why is tax still in the hot seat?Deloitte Development LLC.
22.
DesaiM.DharmapalaD. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145–179.
23.
DesaiM.DharmapalaD. (2009). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537–546.
24.
DesaiM.DyckA.ZingalesL. (2007). Theft and taxes. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(3), 591–623.
25.
DesaiM.HoganC.WilkinsM. (2006). The reputational penalty for aggressive accounting: Earnings restatements and management turnover. The Accounting Review, 81(1), 83–112.
26.
DrakeK.LuschS.StekelbergJ. (2019). Does tax risk affect investor valuation of tax avoidance?Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(1), 151–176.
DyrengS.HoopesJ.WildeJ. (2016). Public pressure and corporate tax behavior. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 147–185.
29.
EttredgeM.ScholzS.SmithK.SunL. (2010). How do restatements begin? Evidence of earnings management preceding restated financial reports. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37(3–4), 332–355.
30.
FarberD. B. (2005). Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter?The Accounting Review, 80(2), 539–561.
FrancisJ.MichasP.YuM. (2013). Office size of big 4 auditors and client restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1626–1661.
33.
FrankM.LynchL.RegoS.ZhaoR. (2018). Are corporate risk taking practices indicative of aggressive reporting practices?Journal of the American Taxation Association, 40(1), 31–55.
34.
GrahamJ.HanlonM.ShevlinT.ShroffN. (2014). Incentives for tax planning and avoidance: Evidence from the field. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 991–1023.
35.
GuoJ.HuangP.ZhangY.ZhouN. (2016). The effect of employee treatment policies on internal control weaknesses and financial restatements. The Accounting Review, 91(4), 1167–1194.
36.
HalperinR.LaiK. (2015). The relation between auditor-provided tax service fees and audit fees after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: From the perspective of cross-selling of services. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30(3), 341–372.
37.
HanlonM.HoopesJ.ShroffN. (2014). The effect of tax authority monitoring and enforcement on financial reporting quality. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 36(2), 137–170.
38.
HanlonM.SlemrodJ. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1–2), 126–141.
HsuP.MooreJ.NeubaumD. (2018). Tax avoidance, financial experts on the audit committee, and business strategy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 45(9–10), 1293–1321.
41.
IngerK.MeckfesselM.ZhouM.FanW. (2018). An examination of the impact of tax avoidance on the readability of tax footnotes. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 40(1), 1–29.
42.
Jimenez-AngueiraC. (2018). The effect of the interplay of corporate governance and external monitoring regimes and firms’ tax avoidance. Advances in Accounting, 41, 7–24.
43.
KhuranaI.MoserW. (2013). Institutional shareholders’ investment horizons and tax avoidance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 35(1), 111–134.
44.
KimJ.McGuireS.SavoyS.WilsonR. (2019). How quickly do firms adjust to optimal levels of tax avoidance?Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), 1824–1860.
45.
KubickT.LynchD.MayberryM.OmerT. (2016). The effects of regulatory scrutiny on tax avoidance: An examination of SEC comment letters. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1751–1780.
46.
LangM.LinsK.MaffettM. (2012). Transparency, liquidity, and valuation: International evidence on when transparency matters most. Journal of Accounting Research, 50, 729–774.
47.
LiC.MaM.OmerT.SunK. (2018, May21–23). How does tax avoidance affect transparency? [Conference session]. ABFER 6TH Annual Conference, Research Collection School of Accountancy, Singapore.
48.
MandeV.SonM. (2013). Do financial restatements lead to auditor changes?Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(2), 119–145.
49.
MaoG. (2014). Testing for joint significance in nonstationary binary choice model. Economic Letters, 122(2), 311–313.
50.
MinnickK.NogaT. (2010). Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management?Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(5), 703–718.
51.
MisangyiV.AcharyaA. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705.
52.
RechnerP.DaltonD. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160.
ScholesM.WolfsonM.EricksonM.HanlonM.MaydewE.ShevlinT. (2015). Taxes and business strategy (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
55.
SeetharamanA.WangW.SunY. (2011). Tax-related financial statements restatements and auditor-provided tax services. Journal of Auditing, Accounting and Finance, 26(4), 677–698.
56.
SeidmanJ.StombergB. (2017). Equity compensation and tax avoidance: Disentangling managerial incentives from tax benefits and reexamining the effect of shareholder rights. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 39(2), 21–41.
57.
SrinivasanS. (2005). Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 291–334.
58.
WangT. S.LinY. M.ChaoC. F. (2013). Board independence, executive compensation and restatement. Applied Financial Economics, 23(11), 963–975.
59.
WildeJ.WilsonR. (2018). Perspectives on corporate tax planning: Observations from the past decade. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 40(2), 63–81.
60.
WilsonR. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969–999.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
