Using Industry Classification Codes to Sample High-Technology Firms: Analysis and Recommendations

Abstract

This study develops procedures for selecting and partitioning samples of high-technology firms for North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), Global Industry Classification System (GICS), and Standardized Industry Classification (SIC) codes. This study also assesses whether NAICS or GICS codes offer improvement over SIC codes as a methodology to identify high-technology firms, including Internet firms. SIC codes are predominantly used in accounting, information systems, business, and economics studies to select high-technology firms for analyses. However, recent studies such as Clarke (1989), Fan and Lang (2000), Ramnath (2001), and Bhojraj, Lee, and Oler (2003) have called into question the accuracy of using SIC codes for firm classification. Our study constructs a benchmark industry classification, constructed from analyses of detailed descriptions of firms' businesses from Description of Business and footnote disclosures (required in all 10-Ks and registration statements). Based on a comparison with our benchmark industry classification, we developed combinations of codes from each system that we recommend be used to construct samples of high-technology firms or specifically targeted high-technology industries. We conclude from our analyses that GICS codes offer improvement over SIC and NAICS codes for targeting technology firms.

Keywords

GICS codes internet methodology NAICS codes sample selection SIC codes technology disclosure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaker

Jacobson

. 2001. “The Value Relevance of Brand Attitude in High-Technology Markets”. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (November): 482–493.

Amit

Livnat

. 1990. “Grouping of Conglomerates by Their Segments' Economic Attributes: Towards a More Meaningful Ratio Analysis”. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 17 (Spring): 85–100.

Barron

Byard

Kile

Riedl

. 2002. “High-Technology Intangibles and Analysts' Forecasts”. Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (May): 289–312.

Barton

Waymire

. 2004. “Investor Protection under Unregulated Financial Reporting”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 38 (1): 65–116.

Bartov

Mohanram

Seethamraju

. 2002. “Valuation of Internet Stocks—An IPO Perspective”. Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (May): 321–346.

Bauman

Das

. 2004. “Stock Market Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets: Evidence from Internet Firms”. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 31 (November/December): 1223–1260.

Bhattacharya

Black

Christensen

Larson

. 2003. “Assessing the Relative Informativeness and Permanence of Pro Forma Earnings and GAAP Operating Earnings”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36 (December): 285–319.

Bhojraj

Lee

Oler

. 2003. “What's My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market Research”. Journal of Accounting Research, 41 (December): 745–774.

Billings

Morton

. 2002. “The Relation Between SFAS No. 95 Cash Flows from Operations and Credit Risk”. Journal of Business, Finance & Accounting, 29: 787–805.

10.

Botosan

Stanford

. 2005. “Managers' Motives to Withhold Segment Disclosures arid the Effect of SFAS No. 131 on Analysts' Information Environment”. The Accounting Review, 80 (July): 751–771.

11.

Bowen

Davis

Matsumoto

. 2005. “Emphasis on Pro Forma versus GAAP Earnings in Quarterly Press Releases: Determinants, SEC Intervention, and Market Reactions”. The Accounting Review, 80 (October): 1011–1038.

12.

Bowen

Davis

Rajgopal

. 2002. “Determinants of Revenue Recognition Policies for Internet Firms”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19 (Winter): 523–562.

13.

Carter

Lynch

. 2004. “The Effect of Stock Option Repricing on Employee Turnover”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37 (February): 91–112.

14.

Chan

L. K.

Lakonishok

Sougiannis

. 1999. “The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures”. Journal of Finance, 56 (June): 2431–2458.

15.

Chan

S. H.

Martin

J. D.

Kensinger

J. W.

. 1990. “Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26: 255–276.

16.

Chen

Defond

Park

. 2002. “Voluntary Disclosure of Balance Sheet Information in Quarterly Earnings Announcements”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33: 229–251.

17.

Clarke

R. N.

1989. “SICs as Delineators of Economic Markets”. Journal of Business, 62: 17–31.

18.

Clarkson

P. M.

Kao

J. L.

Richardson

G. D.

. 1999. “Evidence that Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is a Part of a Firm's Overall Disclosure Package”. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 111–134.

19.

Clem

Cowan

Jeffrey

C. G.

. 2004. “Market Reaction to Proposed Changes in Accounting for Purchased Research and Development in R&D-Intensive Industries”. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 19 (Fall): 405–428.

20.

Collins

D. W.

Maydew

E. L.

Weiss

. 1997. “Changes in the Value-Relevance of Earnings and Book Values over the Past Forty Years”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (December): 39–67.

21.

Core

J. E.

Guay

W. R.

Buskirk

A. V.

. 2003. “Market Valuations in the New Economy: An Investigation of What Has Changed”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34 (January): 43–67.

22.

Davis

Monahan

. 2002. “The Value Relevance of Revenue for Internet Firms: Does Reporting Grossed-Up or Barter Revenue Make a Difference?” Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (May): 445–477.

23.

Demers

Lev

. 2001. “A Rude Awakening: Internet Shakeout in 2000”. Review of Accounting Studies, 6 (June-September): 331–359.

24.

Deng

Lev

Narin

. 1999. “Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance”. Financial Analysts Journal, 55: 20–32.

25.

Dontoh

Radhakrishnan

Ronen

. 2004. “The Declining Value-Relevance of Accounting Information and Non-Information-Based Trading: An Empirical Analysis”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21 (Winter): 795–812.

26.

Dowdell

Press

. 2004. “The Impact of SEC Scrutiny on Financial Statement Reporting of In-Process Research and Development Expense”. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23 (May/June): 227–244.

27.

DuCharme

Rajgopal

Sefcik

. 2002. “Why Was Internet IPO Underpricing So Severe?” Working paper, The University of Washington.

28.

Eberhart

A. C.

2004. “Equity Valuation Using Multiples”. Journal of Investing, 13: 48–54.

29.

Espahbodi

Rezaee

Tehranian

. 2002. “Stock Price Reaction and Value Relevance of Recognition versus Disclosure: The Case of Stock-Based Compensation”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33 (August): 343–373.

30.

Etteredge

Kwon

S. Y.

Smith

. 2002. “Competitive Harm and Companies' Positions on SFAS No. 131”. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17: 93–109.

31.

Fan

J. P. H.

Lang

L. H. P.

. 2000. “The Measurement of Relatedness: An Application to Corporate Diversification”. Journal of Business, 73: 629–660.

32.

Fargher

N. L.

Gorman

L. R.

Wilkins

M. S.

. 1998. “Timely Industry Information as an Assurance Service-Evidence on the Information Content of the Book-to-Bill Ratio”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 17 (Supplement): 109–123.

33.

FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board). 2001. Improving Business Reporting: Insights into Enhancing Voluntary Disclosures. Stamford, CT: FASB.

34.

Francis

Schipper

. 1999. “Have Financial Statements Lost Their Relevance?” Journal of Accounting Research, 37: 319–53.

35.

Godfrey

J. M.

Hamilton

. 2005. “The Impact of R&D Intensity on Demand for Specialist Auditor Services”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22 (Spring): 55–93.

36.

Lev

. 2004. “The Information Content of Royalty Income”. Accounting Horizons, 18 (March): 1–13.

37.

Guenther

D. A.

Rosman

A. J.

. 1994. “Differences between Compustat and CRSP SIC Codes and Related Effects on Research”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18: 115–128.

38.

Guo

Lev

Zhou

. 2005. “The Valuation of Biotech IPOs”. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 20 (4): 423–459.

39.

Hand

J. R. M.

2001. “The Role of Book Income, Web Traffic, and Supply and Demand in the Pricing of U.S. Internet Stocks”. European Finance Review, 15: 295–317.

40.

Healy

Palepu

. 2001. “Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (September) Issue 1–3: 405–440.

41.

Hirschey

Richardson

Scholz

. 2001. “Value Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Case of Patent Data”. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 17 (November): 223–235.

42.

Hirschey

S. L.

Weygandt

J. J.

. 1985. “Amortization Policy for Advertising and Research and Development Expenditures”. Journal of Accounting Research, 38: 375–386.

43.

Y. K.

Yap

C. M.

. 2004. “R&D Investment and Systematic Risk”. Accounting and Finance, 44: 393–418.

44.

Johnson

M. F.

Kasznik

Nelson

K. K.

. 2001. “The Impact of Securities Litigation Reform on the Disclosure of Forward-looking Information by High-Technology Firms”. Journal of Accounting Research, 39: 297–321.

45.

Kahle

K. M.

Walkling

R. A.

. 1996. “The Impact of Industry Classifications on Financial Research”. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31: 309–335.

46.

Keating

Lys

Magee

. 2003. “The Internet Downturn: Finding Valuation Factors in Spring 2000”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34 (January): 189–236.

47.

Kile

2006. “The SEC's Program for Reviewing Financial Reports: A Responsibility of the Division of Corporation Finance”. Working paper, Middle Tennessee State University.

48.

Kile

Reid

. 2005. An Empirical Description of the Internet Sector of the U.S. Economy: Evidence from New Company Filings. Paper from 2005 Americas Conference on Information Systems, August, Omaha, NE.

49.

Kotha

Rajgopal

Rindova

. 2001. “Reputation Building and Performance: An Empirical Analysis of the Top-50 Pure Internet Firms”. European Management Journal, 19 (December): 570–586.

50.

Kozberg

2001. “The Value Drivers of Internet Stocks: A Business Models Approach”. Working Paper, Baruch College.

51.

Krishnan

Press

. 2002. “The North American Industry Classification System and Its Implications for Accounting Research”. Working paper, Temple University.

52.

Kwon

2002. “Financial Analysts' Forecast Accuracy and Dispersion: High-Tech versus Low-Tech Stocks”. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 19 (July): 65–91.

53.

Kwon

Yin

. 2006. “Executive Compensation, Investment Opportunities, and Earnings Management: High-Tech Firms Versus Low-Tech Firms”. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 21 (2): 119–148.

54.

Lang

Lundholm

. 1996. “The Relation between Security Returns, Firm Earnings, and Industry Earnings”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13 (2): 607–629.

55.

Latinen

E. K.

2002. “Financial Rating of European Technology Companies: An International Comparison”. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 29 (September/October): 871–901.

56.

Lazer

Lev

Livnat

. 2001. “Internet Traffic and Portfolio Returns”. Financial Analysts Journal, 57: 30–40.

57.

Lev

Sougiannis

. 1996. “The Capitalization, Amortization and Value Relevance of R&D”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21: 107–139.

58.

Lev

Sougiannis

. 1999. “Penetrating the Book-to-Market Black Box: The R&D Effect”. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 26: 419–445.

59.

Lie

. 2002. “Multiples Used to Estimate Corporate Value”. Financial Analysts Journal, 58 (2): 44–54.

60.

Mohd

2005. “Accounting for Software Development Costs and Information Asymmetry”. The Accounting Review, 80 (October): 1211–1231.

61.

O'Connor

2000. “Approaching the Challenges and Costs of the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)”. The Bottom Line, 13 (2): 83–89.

62.

PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2001. The Value Reporting Revolution. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

63.

Rajgopal

Venkatchalam

Kotha

. 2002. “Managerial Actions, Stock Returns, and Earnings: The Case of Business-to-Business Internet Firms”. Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (May): 529–556.

64.

Rajgopal

Kotha

Venkatchalam

. 2003. “The Value Relevance of Network Advantages: The Case of E-Commerce Firms”. Journal of Accounting Research, 41 (March): 135–162.

65.

Schultz

Zaman

. 2001. “Do the Individuals Closest to Internet Firms Believe They Are Overvalued?” Journal of Financial Economics, 59: 347–381.

66.

SEC (Securities Exchange Commission). 2003. Annual Report 2003. http://www.sec.gov/pdf/ann-rep03/ar03full.pdf.

67.

Trueman

Wong

M. H. F.

Zhang

X. J.

. 2000. “The Eyeballs Have It: Searching for the Value in Internet Stocks”. Journal of Accounting Research, 38 (Supplement): 137–162.

68.

Trueman

Wong

M. H. F.

Zhang

X. J.

. 2001. “Back to Basics: Forecasting the Revenues of Internet firms”. Review of Accounting Studies, 6 (June-September): 305–328.

69.

Trueman

Wong

M. H. F.

Zhang

X. J.

. 2003. “Anomalous Stock Returns Around Internet Firms' Earnings Announcements”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34: 249–271.

70.

Walker

J. A.

Murphy

J. B.

. 2001. “Implementing the North American Industry Classification System at BLS”. Monthly Labor Review, 123 (December): 15–21.