Flexible methods that relax restrictive conditional independence assumptions of latent classanalysis (LCA) are described. Dichotomous and ordered category manifest variables are viewed asdiscretized latent continuous variables. The latent continuous variables are assumed to have a mixtureofmultivariate-normals distribution. Within a latent class, conditional dependence is modeled as the mutual association of all or some latent continuous variables with a continuous latent trait (or in special cases, multiple latent traits). The relaxation of conditional independence assumptions allows LCA to better model natural taxa. Comparisons of specific restricted and unrestricted models permit statistical tests of specific aspects of latent taxonic structure. Latent class, latent trait, and latent distribution analysis can be viewed as special cases of the mixed latent trait model. The relationship between the multivariate probit mixture model proposed here and Rost’s mixed Rasch (1990, 1991) model is discussed. Two studies illustrate different uses of the proposed model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agresti, A. , & Yang, M. (1986). An empirical investigation of some effects of sparseness in contingency tables. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 5, 9–21.
2.
Bock, R. D. , & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.
3.
Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370.
4.
Chandler, J. P. (1969). STEPIT—Finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters [Computer program abstract]. Behavioral Science, 14, 81–82.
5.
Clogg, C. C. (1979). Some latent structure models for the analysis of Likert-type data. Social Science Research, 8, 287–301.
6.
Clogg, C. C. (1995). Latent class models. In G.Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences(pp. 311–359). New York: Plenum.
7.
Croon, M. A. (1990). Latent class analysis with ordered latent classes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 171–192.
8.
Day, N. E. (1969). Estimating the components of a mixture of normal distributions. Biometrika, 56, 463–474.
9.
Edwards, A. W. F. (1972). Likelihood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Espeland, M. A. , & Handelman, S. L. (1989). Using latent class models to characterize and assess relative error in discrete measurements. Biometrics, 45, 587–599.
11.
Everitt, B. S. (1988). A finite mixture model for the clustering of mixed-model data. Statistics and Probability Letters, 6, 305–309.
12.
Everitt, B. S. , & Merette, C. (1990). The clustering of mixed-mode data: A comparison of possible approaches. Journal of Applied Statistics, 17, 283–297.
13.
Formann, A. K. (1992). Linear logistic latent class analysis for polytomous data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 476–486.
14.
Goodman, L. A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215–231.
15.
Hagenaars, J. A. (1988). Latent structure models with direct effects between indicators: Local dependence models. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 379–405.
16.
Heinen, T. (1996). Latent class and discrete latent trait models: Similarities and differences. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
17.
Henkelman, R. M. , Kay, I., & Bronskill, M. J. (1990). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis without truth. Medical Decision Making, 10, 24–29.
18.
Jorgensen, M. , & Hunt, L. (1995). Report on mixture model clustering of data sets with categorical and continuous variables(Research Report No. 36, Series II). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Department of Statistics.
19.
Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: Scientific Software.
20.
Kendler, K. S. , Eaves, L. J., Walters, E. E., Neale, M.C., Heath, A. C., & Kessler, R. C. (1996). The identification and validation of distinct depressive syndromes in a population-based sample of female twins. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 391–399.
21.
Lazarsfeld, P. F. ,& Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
22.
Lindsay, B. , Clogg, C. C., & Grego, J. (1991). Semiparametric estimation in the Rasch model and related exponential response models, including a simple latent class model for item analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 96–107.
23.
Lord F. M. , & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
McCutcheon, A. C. (1987). Latent class analysis. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.
25.
Meehl, P. E. (1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences in degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality, 60, 117–174.
26.
Mislevy, R. J. (1984). Estimating latent distributions. Psychometrika, 49, 359–381.
27.
Press, W. H. , Teukolsky, S. A., Vettering, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1989). Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: The art of scientific computing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Qu Y. , Tan M., & Kutner M. H. (1996). Random effects models in latent class analysis forevaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests. Biometrics, 52, 797–810.
29.
Rasch, G. (1960/80). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. (Copenhagen, Danish Institute for Educational Research). Expanded edition (1980), with foreword and afterword by B. D. Wright. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Rost, J. (1988). Rating scale analysis with latent class models. Psychometrika, 53, 327–348.
31.
Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271–282.
32.
Rost, J. (1991). A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 75–92.
33.
Rost, J. , & von Davier, M. (1992). MIRA: A PC program for the mixed Rasch model. Kiel, Germany: IPN—Institute for Science Education.
34.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores.Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17.
35.
Samejima, F. (1972). A general model for free response data. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 18.
36.
Sclove, S. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343.
37.
Uebersax, J. S. (1993a). Statistical modeling of expert ratings on medical treatment appropriateness. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 421–427.
38.
Uebersax, J. S. (1993b). LLCA: Located latent class analysis [Computer program and user's manual]. Available from http://www.stats.cmu.edu and http://members.xoom.com/jsuebersax/.
39.
Uebersax, J. S. (1994). Latent class analysis of substance abuse patterns. In L. Collins & L.Seitz (Eds.), Advances in data analysis for prevention intervention research(NIDAResearch Monograph No. 142). Rockville MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
40.
Uebersax, J. S. (1996). On the dimensionality of a latent class analysis solution. Unpublished manuscript.
41.
Uebersax, J. S. (1997). Analysis of student problem behaviors with latent trait, latent class, and related probit mixture models. In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.), Applications of latent class and latent trait models. New York: Waxman-Verlag.
42.
Uebersax, J. S. (1998). LTMA: Latent trait mixture analysis [Computer program and user's manual]. Available from http://www.stats.cmu.edu and http://members.xoom.com/jsuebersax/.
43.
Uebersax, J. S. , & Grove, W. M. (1993). A latent trait finite mixture model for the analysis of rating agreement. Biometrics, 49, 823–835.
44.
van de Pol, F. , Langeheine, R., & de Jong, W. (1989). PANMARK user manual. Voorburg, The Netherlands: Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics.
45.
Wolfe, J. H. (1970). Pattern clustering by multivariate mixture analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 5, 329–350.
46.
Yamamoto, K. (1989). HYBRID model of IRT and latent class models(ETS Research Report No. RR 89-41). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
