Coombs, C.H. (1964). A theory of data. New York : Wiley.
2.
Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.
3.
Goodman, L.A. (1986). Some useful extensions of the usual correspondence analysis and the usual log-linear model approach in the analysis of contingency tables. International Statistical Review, 54, 243-309.
4.
Greenacre, M.J. (1984). Theory and applications ofcorrespondence analysis . London: Academic Press.
5.
Greenacre, M.J. (1993). Correspondence analysis in practice. London: Academic Press.
6.
Guttman, L. (1941). The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method of scale construction. In P. Horst (Ed.), The prediction of personal adjustment (pp. 321-348). New York: Social Science Research Council .
7.
Hagenaars, J.A. (1990). Categorical longitudinal data. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
8.
Hayashi, C. (1952). On the prediction of phenomena from qualitative data and the quantification of qualitative data from mathematico-statistical point of view. Annals ofthe Institute of Statistical Mathematics , 3, 69-98.
9.
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J.A. (1989). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.
10.
Nishisato, S. (1980). Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
11.
Takane, Y. (1982). A review of "Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications" by Nishisato. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 10, 67-68.
12.
Takane, Y. (1987). Analysis of contingency tables by ideal point discriminant analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 493-513.
13.
Takane, Y., & Shibayama, T. (1991). Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables. Psychometrika, 56, 97-120.
14.
Tanaka, Y. (1984). Sensitivity analysis in Hayashi's third method of quantification. Behaviormetrika, 16, 31-44.
15.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-353.
16.
van der Heijden, P.G.M., Mooijaart, A., & Takane, Y. (1994). Correspondence analysis and contingency table models. In M. J. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.), Correspondence analysis in the social sciences (pp. 79-111). New York: Academic Press.