Adams, R.J., & Wilson, M. (1992, April). A random coefficients multinomial logit: Generalizing Rasch models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
2.
Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N.
3.
Petrov & F. Csáki (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest: Akademiai Kiadó.
4.
Andersen, E.B. (1973). Conditional inference for multiple choice questionnaires . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 26, 31-44.
5.
Andersen, E.B. (1983). A general latent structure model for contingency table data. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (Eds.), Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 117-138). Hillsdale NJ : Erlbaum.
6.
Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories . Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
7.
Ashcraft, M.H. (1982). The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach. Developmental Review, 2, 213-236.
8.
Assessment of Performance Unit. (1980). Mathematical development: Secondary survey (Research Rep. No. 1)London: Assessment of Performance Unit, Department of Education and Science.
9.
Baron, J.B., Forgione, P.D., Jr. , Rindone, D.A., Kruglanski, H., & Davey, B. (1989, March). Toward a new generation of student outcome measures: Connecticut's common core of learning assessmentPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
10.
Baxter, G.P., Shavelson, R.J., Goldman, S.R., & Pine, J. (1991). Evaluation of procedure-based scoring for hands-on science assessmentSanta Barbara: University of California, Graduate School of Education.
11.
Biggs, J.B., & Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomyNew York: Academic Press .
12.
Bock, R.D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when the responses are scored in two or more nominal categoriesPsychometrika, 37, 29-51.
13.
California Assessment Project. (1989). A question of thinking: A first look at students' performance on open-ended questions in mathematicsSacramento: California State Department of Education.
14.
Collis, K.F., & Davey, H.A. (1986). A technique for evaluating skills in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 23, 651-663.
15.
Cureton, E.E. (1965). Reliability and validity: Basic assumptions and experimental designsEducational and Psychological Measurement , 25, 326-346.
16.
Dayton, C.M., & Macready, G.B. (1989, March). Partial knowledge modelsPaper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education, San Francisco.
17.
Fischer, K.W., Pipp, S.L., & Bullock, D. (1984). Detecting discontinuities in development: Methods and measurement. In R. N. Emde & R. Harmon (Eds.), Continuities and discontinuities in development (pp. 95-121). Norwood NJ: Ablex.
18.
Flavell, J.H. (1971). Stage-related properties of cognitive development . Cognitive Psychology, 2, 421-453.
Glaser, R., Lesgold, A., & Lajoie, S. (1987). Toward a cognitive theory for the measurement of achievement. In R. Ronning, J. Glover, J. C. Conoley, & J. Witt (Eds.), The influence of cognitive psychology on testing and measurement: The Buros-Nebraska Symposium on measurement and testing (Vol. 3) (pp. 41-85). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Goodman, L.A. (1990). Total-score models and Rasch-type models for the analysis of a multidimensional contingency table, or a set of multidimensional tables, with specified and/or unspecified order for response categories . In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 249-294). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
22.
Guttman, L. (1941). The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method for scale construction. In P. Horst (Ed.), The prediction of personal adjustment (pp. 319-348). New York: Social Science Research Council.
23.
Haertel, E., & Hativa, N. (1986). Measuring stages of concept attainment in geometry: Latent class analysis of the van Hiele levels (Research Report)Stanford CA: Department of Education, Stanford University .
24.
Kelderman, H. (1984). Loglinear Rasch model testsPsychometrika, 49, 223-245.
25.
Kelderman, H. (1989, April). Loglinear multidimensional IRT models for polytomously scored itemsPaper presented at the Fifth International Objective Measurement Workshop, Berkeley CA.
26.
Kelderman, H., & Steen, R. (1988). LOGIMO: A program for loglinear IRT modeling [Computer program]Enschede, The Netherlands: Department of Education, University of Twente.
27.
Kemeny, J., Snell, J., & Thompson, G. (1957). Introduction to finite mathematics . Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall .
28.
Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47 , 149-174.
29.
Masters, G.N. (1988). Measurement models for ordered response categories . In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.), Latent trait and latent class models (pp. 11-29). New York: Plenum.
30.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence (M. Piercy & D. E. Berlyne, Trans.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
31.
Romberg, T.A., Collis, K.F., Donovan, B.F., Buchanan, A.E., & Romberg, M.N. (1982). The development of mathematical problem solving superitems (Report of NIE/ECS Item Development Project)Madison: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research .
32.
Romberg, T.A., Jurdak, M.E., Collis, K.F., & Buchanan, A.E. (1982). Construct validity of a set of mathematical superitems (Report of NIE/ECS Item Development Project)Madison: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
33.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement , No. 17.
34.
Siegler, R.S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's additionJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116 , 250-264.
35.
Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response modelsPsychometrika, 49, 501-519.
36.
Van Hiele, P.M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics educationOrlando FL: Academic Press.
37.
Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development (pp. 125-148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
Wiggins, G. (1989, May). A true test: Toward more authentic assessmentPhi Delta Kappan, 71, 703-713.
39.
Wilson, M. (1988). Detecting and interpreting local item dependence using a family of Rasch modelsApplied Psychological Measurement , 12, 353-364.
40.
Wilson, M. (1989). A comparison of deterministic and probabilistic approaches to measuring learning structuresAustralian Journal of Education, 32 , 125-138.
41.
Wilson, M. (1990). Measuring a van Hiele geometry sequence: A reanalysis . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 21, 230-237.
42.
Wilson, M., & Adams, R.J. (in press). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the ordered partition model. Journal of Educational Statistics .
43.
Wilson, M., & Iventosch, L. (1988). Using the partial credit model to investigate responses to structures subtests. Applied Measurement in Education, 1, 319-334.
44.
Wilson, M., & Masters, G.N. (in press). The partial credit model and null categories. Psychometrika.