Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Results from 726 validity studies were analyzed to determine the degree of validity generalization of the Law School Admission Test for predicting first- year grades in law school. Four validity generaliza tion procedures were used and their results com pared. As much as 70% of the variance in observed validity coefficients could be accounted for by dif ferences in the within-study variability of LSAT scores, simple sampling error, and between-study differences in criterion reliability. The 90% credibil ity value for the true validities was estimated to be .45, and the average true validity was estimated to be .54. Despite the substantial degree of validity generalization, law school and the year the study was conducted explained significant portions of the residual variance in validities. Thus, some degree of situational specificity of validity remained.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American College Testing Program. Assessing students on the way to college: Technical report for the ACT assessment program , Vol. 1. Iowa City: American College Testing Program, 1973.

Callender, J.C. , & Osburn, H.G. Development and test of a new model for validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 543-558.

Carlson, A.B. , & Werts, C.E. Relationships among law school predictors, law school performance, and bar examination results (Report No. LSAC-76-1. In Law School Admission Council, Reports of LSAC-sponsored research: 1975-1977 (Vol. 3). Princeton NJ: Law School Admission Council, 1977.

Linn, R.L. Admissions testing on trial. American Psychologist, in press.

Linn, R.L. Range restriction problems in the use of self-selected groups for test validation . Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 69-73.

Linn, R.L. , Harnisch, D.L. , & Dunbar, S.B. "Corrections" for range restriction: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections. Journal of Applied Psychology, in press.

Novick, M.R. , Jackson, P.H. , Thayer, D.T. , & Cole, N.S. Estimating multiple regression in m groups: A cross validation study. The British Journal of Mathemical and Statistical Psychology, 1972, 25, 33-50.

Pearlman, K. , Schmidt, F.L. , & Hunter, J.E. Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65,373-406.

Rubin, D.B. Using empirical Bayes techniques in the law school validity studies. (Report No. LSAC 78-la. Law School Admission Research, Princeton NJ: Law School Admission Council, 1978.

10.

Schmidt, F.L. , Gast-Rosenberg, I. , & Hunter, J.E. Test of a new model of validity generalization: Results for computer programmers . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 643-651.

11.

Schmidt, F.L. , & Hunter, J.E. Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 529-540.

12.

Schmidt, F.L. , Hunter, J.E. , & Pearlman, K. Progress in validity generalization: Comments on Callender and Osburn and further developments. Journal of Applied Psychology, in press.

13.

Schmidt, F.L. , Hunter, J.E. , Pearlman, K. , & Shane, G.S. Further tests of the Schmidt-Hunter Bayesian validity generalization procedure . Personnel Psychology, 1979, 32, 257-281.

14.

Schrader, W.B. Summary of law school validity studies, 1948-1975 (Report No. LSAC-76-8). In Law School Admission Council, Reports of LSAC-sponsored research: 1975-1977 (Vol. 3). Princeton NJ: Law School Admission Council, 1977.

15.

Willingham, W.W. , & Breland, H.M. The status of selective admissions. In Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education, Selective admissions in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977 , 66-244.

Validity Generalization and Situational Specificity: An Analysis of the Prediction of First—Year Grades in Law School

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References