Abstract
Tailored testing by Cliff's (1975) method of im plied orders was simulated through the use of re sponses gathered during conventional administra tion of the Stanford-Binet intelligence test. Tail oring eliminated approximately half the responses with only modest decreases in score reliability. Re sponses in tailored tests were shown by the Spear man-Brown prophecy formula to be equivalent to from 1.09 to 1.48 conventional items. Ninety-five percent of all responses implied by the tailoring procedures were identical to responses actually ob tained during live testing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
