A Psychometric Investigation of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire

Abstract

Summaries of item properties for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) are reported, based upon the responses of 99 male and 92 female undergraduate psychology students. Means, stan dard deviations, and internal consistencies were comparable to those already published, with the ex ception of lower reliabilities for the P and L scales. A high incidence of extreme p values and correla tion with social desirability was noted for the P scale. Item factor analyses at both the first- and third-order levels did not replicate the four-factor structure claimed by Eysenck; at best, four com ponents accounted for approximately 30% of the observed variance. Many items did not load in ac cordance with the EPQ scoring key, and many items did not load on an interpretable component. The question of difficulty factors is discussed: None were located. It is concluded that there is little em pirical support for the structure claimed for the EPQ.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berg, I.A. (Ed.), Response set in personality assessment. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

Cattell, R.B. Higher order factor structures and reticular vs hierarchical formulae for their interpretation. In C. Banks & P. L. Broadhurst (Eds.), Studies in psychology. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1966.

Edwards, A.L. The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1970.

Eysenck, H.J. The manual of the Maudsley Personality Inventory. San Diego : Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1962.

Eysenck, H.J. Superfactors P, E, and N in a comprehensive factor space. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1978,13, 475-481.

Eysenck, H.J. , & Eysenck, S.B.G. Manual for the Eysenck Personality Inventory . San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1968.

Eysenck, H.J. , & Eysenck, S.B.G. Personality structure and measurement. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.

Eysenck, H.J. , & Eysenck, S.B.G. Eysenck Personality Questionnaire manual. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service , 1975.

Eysenck, H.J. , & Eysenck, S.B.G. Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1976.

10.

Farley, F.H. Social desirability, extraversion, and neuroticism: A learning analysis. Journal of Psychology, 1966, 64, 113-118.

11.

Ferguson, G.A. The factorial interpretation of test difficulty. Psychometrika , 1941, 6, 13-17.

12.

Gorsuch, R.L. Factor analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1974.

13.

Helmes, E. , & Jackson, D.N. The item factor structure of the Personality Research Form. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977,1, 185-194.

14.

Helmes, E. , Reed, P.L. , & Jackson, D.N. Desirability and frequency scale values and endorsement proportions for items of Personality Research Form-E. Psychological Reports, 1977, 41, 435-444.

15.

Hendrickson, A.E. , & White, P. O. Promax : A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1964, 17, 65-70.

16.

Howarth, E. A psychometric investigation of Eysenck's Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1976, 40, 173-185.

17.

Howarth, E. , & Browne, J.A. An item factor analysis of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1972, 11, 162-174.

18.

Jackson, D.N. A sequential system for personality scale development. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1970.

19.

Jackson, D.N. Personality Research Form manual (Rev. ed. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press, 1974.

20.

Jackson, D.N. , & Messick, S. Response styles on the MMPI: Comparison of clinical and normal samples. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65, 285-299.

21.

Kaiser, H.F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 187-200.

22.

Loo, R. A psychometric investigation of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1979, 43, 54-58.

23.

McDonald, R.P. , & Ahlawat, K.S. Difficulty factors in binary data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1974, 27, 82-99.

24.

Rogers, T.B. The process of responding to personality items: Some issues, a theory, and some research. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs , 1971, 6 (Monograph No. 71-2).

25.

Schönemann, P.H. A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 1-10.