Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

One of the main concerns in multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) is to detect the relationship between items and latent traits, which can be treated as a latent variable selection problem. An attractive method for latent variable selection in multidimensional 2-parameter logistic (M2PL) model is to minimize the observed Bayesian information criterion (BIC) by the expectation model selection (EMS) algorithm. The EMS algorithm extends the EM algorithm and allows the updates of the model (e.g., the loading structure in MIRT) in the iterations along with the parameters under the model. As an extension of the M2PL model, the multidimensional 3-parameter logistic (M3PL) model introduces an additional guessing parameter which makes the latent variable selection more challenging. In this paper, a well-designed EMS algorithm, named improved EMS (IEMS), is proposed to accurately and efficiently detect the underlying true loading structure in the M3PL model, which also works for the M2PL model. In simulation studies, we compare the IEMS algorithm with several state-of-art methods and the IEMS is of competitiveness in terms of model recovery, estimation precision, and computational efficiency. The IEMS algorithm is illustrated by its application to two real data sets.

Keywords

multidimensional 3-parameter logistic model latent variable selection expectation model selection algorithm Gauss-Hermite quadrature Newton’s method

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

Stegun

I. A.

(1972). Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Wiley.

Akaike

(1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Béguin

A. A.

Glas

C. A. W.

(2001). MCMC estimation and some model-fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models. Psychometrika, 66(4), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296195

Bernaards

C. A.

Jennrich

R. I.

(2005). Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(5), 676–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404272507

Bianconcini

(2014). Asymptotic properties of adaptive maximum likelihood estimators in latent variable models. Bernoulli, 20(3), 1507–1531. https://doi.org/10.3150/13-BEJ531

Bock

R. D.

Aitkin

(1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293801

Bock

R. D.

Gibbons

Muraki

(1988). Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168801200305

Browne

M. W.

(2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(1), 111–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05

Cai

(2010). High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm. Psychometrika, 75(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9136-x

10.

Chen

Wang

(2021). Using EM algorithm for finite mixtures and reformed supplemented EM for MIRT calibration. Psychometrika, 86(1), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09745-6

11.

Chen

Zhang

(2019). Joint maximum likelihood estimation for high-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis. Psychometrika, 84(1), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-018-9646-5

12.

Chen

Zhang

(2021). Estimation methods for item factor analysis: An overview. In Zhao

Chen

D. G.

(Eds.), Modern statistical methods for health research (pp. 329–350). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72437-5_15

13.

Cho

A. E.

Wang

Zhang

(2021). Gaussian variational estimation for multidimensional item response theory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 74(Suppl 1), 52–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12219

14.

Cho

A. E.

Xiao

Wang

(2024). Regularized variational estimation for exploratory item factor analysis. Psychometrika, 89(1), 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-022-09874-6

15.

Davis

P. J.

Rabinowitz

(2014). Methods of numerical integration (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

16.

Dempster

A. P.

Laird

N. M.

Rubin

D. B.

(1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x

17.

Eddelbuettel

Francois

(2011). Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ integration. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i08

18.

Eysenck

Barrett

(2013). Re-introduction to cross-cultural studies of the EPQ. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.022

19.

Friedman

J. H.

Hastie

Tibshirani

(2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i01

20.

Gibbons

R. D.

Hedeker

D. R.

(1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 57(3), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295430

21.

Guo

Zheng

(2019). The Bayesian expectation-maximization-maximization for the 3PLM. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01175

22.

Hendrickson

A. E.

White

P. O.

(1964). Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1964.tb00244.x

23.

Janssen

De Boeck

(1999). Confirmatory analyses of componential test structure using multidimensional item response theory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906Mb340205

24.

Jennrich

R. I.

Bentler

P. M.

(2011). Exploratory bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 76(4), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-011-9218-4

25.

Jiang

Nguyen

Rao

J. S.

(2015). The E-MS algorithm: Model selection with incomplete data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(511), 1136–1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2014.948545

26.

Jin

Moustaki

Yang-Wallentin

(2018). Approximated penalized maximum likelihood for exploratory factor analysis: An orthogonal case. Psychometrika, 83(3), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-018-9623-z

27.

Kaiser

H. F.

(1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233

28.

Kline

(1986). A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. Methuen.

29.

Mckinley

(1989). Confirmatory analysis of test structure using multidimensional item response theory. ETS Research Report Series, 1989(2), i-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2330-8516.1989.tb00145.x

30.

Reckase

M. D.

(2009). Multidimensional item response theory. Springer.

31.

Sass

D. A.

Schmitt

T. A.

(2010). A comparative investigation of rotation criteria within exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(1), 73–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170903504810

32.

Schwarz

(1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

33.

Shang

P. F.

Shan

Tang

M. L.

G. T. S.

(2023). Accelerating L₁-penalized expectation maximization algorithm for latent variable selection in multidimensional two-parameter logistic models. PLoS One, 18(1), Article e0279918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279918

34.

Shang

Zheng

Q. Z.

P. F.

Shan

Tang

M. L.

(2024). A generalized expectation model selection algorithm for latent variable selection in multidimensional item response theory models. Statistics and Computing, 34(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-023-10360-x

35.

Sun

Chen

Liu

Ying

Xin

(2016). Latent variable selection for multidimensional item response theory models via L₁ regularization. Psychometrika, 81(4), 921–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9529-6

36.

Tibshirani

(1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 58(1), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x

37.

P. F.

Shang

Zheng

Q. Z.

Shan

Tang

M. L.

(2022). Latent variable sdelection in multidimensional item response theory models using the expectation model selection algorithm. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 75(2), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12261

38.

Zhang

Chen

(2022). Computation for latent variable model estimation: A unified stochastic proximal framework. Psychometrika, 87(4), 1473–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-022-09863-9

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.81 MB

0.27 MB

0.29 MB

0.27 MB

0.86 MB

The Improved EMS Algorithm for Latent Variable Selection in M3PL Model

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material