Conventional item response theory (IRT) modeling of personality responses considers two item characteristics—location and discrimination—but only one person characteristic—location or trait level. An IRT modeling approach that jointly considers item and person discriminations, however, is thought to be more realistic and appropriate in this domain and has several potential advantages. This article develops a model of this type for unidimensional binary responses together with procedures for estimating item and person parameters and assessing model appropriateness (including person fit). A series of preliminary simulations suggests that the approach is feasible, and a real-data example illustrates the potential advantages with respect to the standard two-parameter model. Limitations of the proposal and further work are also discussed.
BockR. D.MislevyR. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431-444.
3.
CaoM.DrasgowF.ChoS. (2015). Developing ideal intermediate personality items for the ideal point model. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 252-275.
4.
CudeckR.HarringJ. R.du ToitS. H. (2009). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of a latent variable model with interaction. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 131-144.
5.
CulpepperS. A. (2010). Studying individual differences in predictability with gamma regression and nonlinear multilevel models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 153-185.
6.
CuretonE. E. (1957). The upper and lower twenty-seven per cent rule. Psychometrika, 22, 293-296.
7.
DonlonT. F.FischerF. E. (1968). An index of an individual’s agreement with group-determined item difficulties. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 105-113.
8.
EmonsW. H. M.SijtsmaK.MeijerR. R. (2007). On the consistency of individual classification using short scales. Psychological Methods, 12, 105-120.
9.
FerrandoP. J. (2004). Person reliability in personality measurement: An item response theory analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 126-140.
10.
FerrandoP. J. (2007). A Pearson-type-VII item response model for assessing person fluctuation. Psychometrika, 72, 25-41.
11.
FerrandoP. J. (2013). A general linear framework for modeling continuous responses with error in persons and items. Methodology, 9, 150-161.
12.
FiskeD. W. (1968). Items and persons: Formal duals and psychological differences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 3, 393-401.
13.
FraserC.McDonaldR. P. (2012). NOHARM 4: A Windows program for fitting both unidimensional and multidimensional normal ogive models of latent trait theory. http://www.noharm.software.informer.com
14.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In MervieldeI.DearyI.De FruytF.OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press
15.
GuilfordJ. P. (1959). Personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
16.
KeldermanH.MolenaarP. C. M. (2007). The effect of individual differences in factor loadings on the standard factor model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 435-456.
17.
KuncelR. B. (1973). Response processes and relative location of subject and item. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 545-563.
18.
LevineM. V.RubinD. B. (1979). Measuring the appropriateness of multiple choice test scores. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 269-290.
19.
LordF. M.NovickM. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
LumsdenJ. (1977). Person reliability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 477-482.
21.
LumsdenJ. (1980). Variations on a theme by Thurstone. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 1-7.
22.
MATLAB. (1999). MATLAB 5.3 Release 11.1. Natick, MA: The Math Works.
23.
McDonaldR. P. (1997). Normal-ogive multidimensional model. In van der LindenW.HambletonR. K. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 257-269). New York, NY: Springer.
24.
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
MilesJ. N. V.HempelS. (2003). The Eysenck Personality Scales: The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised (EPQ-R) and the Eysenck Personality Profiler (EPP). In HersenM. (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment (CHOPA), Vol. 2: Personality and psychopathology assessment (pp. 99-107). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
ReiseS. P. (2000). Using multilevel logistic regression to evaluate person-fit in IRT models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 543-568.
28.
ReiseS. P.DueA. M. (1991). The influence of test characteristics on the detection of aberrant response patterns. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 217-226.
29.
RizopoulosD.MoustakiI. (2008). Generalized latent variable models with non-linear effects. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 415-438.
30.
StarkS.ChernyshenkoO.DrasgowF.WilliamsB. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 25-39.
31.
StrandmarkN. L.LinnR. L. (1987). A generalized logistic item response model parameterizing test score inappropriateness. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 355-370.
32.
SwaminathanH.GiffordJ. A. (1985). Bayesian estimation in the two-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 50, 349-364.
33.
TayL.DrasgowF.RoundsJ.WilliamsB. (2009). Fitting measurement models to vocational interest data: Are dominance models ideal?Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1287-1304.
34.
TaylorJ. B. (1977). Item homogeneity, scale reliability, and the self-concept hypothesis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 349-361.
35.
TellegenA. (1988). The analysis of consistency in personality assessment. Journal of Personality, 56, 622-663.
36.
van Krimpen-StoopE. M. L. A.MeijerR. R. (2002). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive tests with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 164-180.
37.
VoyceC. D.JacksonD. N. (1977). An evaluation of threshold theory for personality assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 383-408.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
