CamilliG.ShepardL. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
ClauserB.MazorK. M.HambletonR. K. (1994). The effects of score group width on the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 67-78.
3.
DonoghueJ. R.AllenN. L. (1993). Thin versus thick matching in the Mantel-Haenszel procedure for detecting DIF. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 131-154.
4.
DoransN. J.HollandP. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. In HollandP. W.WainerH. (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 35-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
FidalgoA. M. (1994). MHDIF: A computer program for detecting uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 300.
6.
HollandP. W.ThayerD. T. (1988). Differential item functioning and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In WainerH.BraunH. I. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 129-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
MantelN. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom, extension of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. American Statistical Association Journal, 58, 690-700.
8.
MantelN.HaenszelW. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719-748.
WallerN. G. (1998). EZDIF: Detection of uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning with the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression procedures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 391.