“They Are the Shoulders I Stand On”: Ancestral Self-Concept Increases People of Color’s Racial Equality Activism and Intraminority Solidarity

Abstract

The present research examines how the conceptualization of the self as part of one’s ancestry may enhance people of color’s activism. Two correlational studies (Ns = 593 and 160) showed that greater ancestral self-concept was associated with greater past engagement in prejudice confrontation (Study 1a) and racial equality activism (Study 1b). Follow-up experiments with Asian (Study 2; N = 220) and Black (Studies 3–4; Ns = 310 and 511) Americans demonstrated that people who wrote about themselves as part of their ancestry (vs. control condition) expressed greater intentions to participate in racial activism and greater activism tenacity. Notably, ancestral self-concept increased intraminority solidarity, including Black Americans’ pro-Palestine activism intentions (Study 3) and donation to a pro-immigrant cause (Study 4). These effects were mediated by greater endorsement of background-specific strengths, motives to continue one’s ancestral legacy, and linked fate beliefs. Findings advance a strength-based psychological study of the self and activism.

Keywords

ancestry activism self/identity solidarity strength-based

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agostini

van Zomeren

(2021). Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints. Psychological Bulletin, 147(7), 667–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000256

Allen

R. L.

Bagozzi

R. P.

(2001). Consequences of the Black Sense of Self. Journal of Black Psychology, 27(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798401027001001

Anderson

R. E.

Jones

S. C. T.

Stevenson

H. C.

(2020). The initial development and validation of the racial socialization competency scale: Quality and quantity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 26(4), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000316

Aron

Lewandowski

Branand

Mashek

Aron

(2022). Self-expansion motivation and inclusion of others in self: An updated review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(12), 3821–3852. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221110630

Arshad

Chung

J. M.

(2022). Practical recommendations for considering culture, race, and ethnicity in personality psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(2), e12656. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12656

Asgari

Dasgupta

Stout

J. G.

(2012). When do counterstereotypic ingroup members inspire versus deflate? The effect of successful professional women on young women’s leadership self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(3), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211431968

Bang

H. M.

Koval

C. Z.

Wade-Benzoni

K. A.

(2017). It’s the thought that counts over time: The interplay of intent, outcome, stewardship, and legacy motivations in intergenerational reciprocity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73,197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.006

Bauer

C. A.

Walton

G. M.

(2023). Identity-reframing interventions: How to effectively highlight individuals’ background-specific strengths. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 18, e12830. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12830

Besta

Jaśkiewicz

Kosakowska-Berezecka

Lawendowski

Zawadzka

A. M.

(2018). What do I gain from joining crowds? Does self-expansion help to explain the relationship between identity fusion, group efficacy and collective action? European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2332

10.

Blanchette

Pham

M. D.

(2026). Relationships between creativity and abolitionist ideology. Journal of Creativity, 36(1), 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2026.100121

11.

Breines

J. G.

Chen

(2012). Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9), 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212445599

12.

Brown

D. L.

Langrehr

K. J.

Schmidt

C. K.

Blackmon

S. M.

Jones

N. E.

(2025). The relationship between black women’s gendered racial socialization, self-evaluation, and subjective well-being. The Counseling Psychologist, 53(7), 984–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000251396591

13.

Chaney

K. E.

Forbes

(2023). We stand in solidarity with you (If it helps our ingroup). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 26(2), 304–320.

14.

Chang

D. F.

Yoo

Lee

C. S.

Prasai

Okazaki

(2023). From racial awakening to collective action: Asian Americans’ pathways to activism and benevolent support during COVID-19. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 29(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000617

15.

Cheryan

Tsai

J. L.

(2007). Ethnic identity. In Leong

F. T. L.

Ebreo

Kinoshita

Inman

A. G.

Yang

L. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of Asian American psychology (2nd ed., pp. 125–139). Sage Publications, Inc.

16.

Chin

J. C.

Mártir Luna

G. A.

Huo

Y. J.

Pérez

E. O.

(2023). Motivating collective action in diverse groups: Person of color identity, prototypicality perceptions, and environmental attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(6), 751–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221083818

17.

Cohen-Eick

Shuman

van Zomeren

Halperin

(2025). Should I stay or should I go? Motives and barriers for sustained collective action toward social change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51(6), 910–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231206638

18.

Corning

A. F.

Myers

D. J.

(2002). Individual orientation toward engagement in social action. Political Psychology, 23(4), 703–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00304

19.

Cortland

C. I.

Craig

M. A.

Shapiro

J. R.

Richeson

J. A.

Neel

Goldstein

N. J.

(2017). Solidarity through shared disadvantage: Highlighting shared experiences of discrimination improves relations between stigmatized groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000100

20.

Coşkan

Ünal

. (2025). Rethinking collective resilience under oppression through Kurdish understandings of power and resistance. In Acar

Y. G.

Këllezi

Penić

(Eds.), The power of collective resilience against political violence and repression (pp. 104–123). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032708492-9

21.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the psychological foundations of conflict and coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415611252

22.

Dai

J. D.

Yellowtail

J. L.

Munoz-Salgado

Lopez

J. J.

Ward-Griffin

Hawk

C. E.

LeBlanc

Santos

Farero

Eason

A. E.

Fryberg

S. A.

(2023). We are still here: Omission and perceived discrimination galvanized civic engagement among native Americans. Psychological Science, 34(7), 739–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231165271

23.

Davis

(2015). Freedom is a constant struggle ( Barat

, Ed.). Haymarket Books.

24.

Dawson

M. C.

(1994). Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics. Princeton University Press.

25.

De Souza

Schmader

. (2024). When people do allyship: A typology of allyship action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 29(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683241232732.

26.

Debrosse

Hernandez

I. A.

(2026). Community and voice: Emphasizing black and latine adolescents’ strengths promotes identity alignment, belonging, and academic persistence. Journal of Adolescence, 98(1), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70049

27.

Diemer

M. A.

Rapa

L. J

. (2016). Unraveling the complexity of critical consciousness, political efficacy, and political action among marginalized adolescents. Child Development, 87(1), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12446

28.

Elliott

Bang

(2024). Reducing indigenous suicide: Recognizing vital land and food systems for livelihoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 73(1–2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12712

29.

Emery

L. F.

Gardner

W. L.

Carswell

K. L.

Finkel

E. J.

(2021). Who are “we”? Couple identity clarity and romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220921717

30.

Erakat

(2019). Justice for some: Law and the question of Palestine. Stanford University Press.

31.

Fanon

(1963). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press.

32.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

33.

Fiedler

Schott

Meiser

(2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.007

34.

Fischer

F. B.

Becker

J. C.

Kito

Zamantılı Nayır

(2017). Collective action against sexism in Germany, Turkey, and Japan: The influence of self-construal and face concerns. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216683533

35.

Frasure-Yokley

Masuoka

Barreto

M. A

. (2019). Introduction to dialogues: Linked fate and the politics of groups and identities. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(3), 610–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1638802

36.

Freire

(1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum

37.

Gecas

(1982). The self concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245

38.

Greenaway

K. H.

Haslam

S. A.

Cruwys

Branscombe

N. R.

Ysseldyk

Heldreth

(2015). From “we” to “me”: Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000019

39.

Gregg

A. P.

Sedikides

Gebauer

J. E.

(2011). Dynamics of identity: Between self-enhancement and self-assessment. In Schwartz

S. J.

Luyckx

Vignoles

V. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 305–327). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_14

40.

Hagger

M. S.

Hein

Chatzisarantis

N. L. D.

(2011). Achievement goals, physical self-concept, and social physique anxiety in a physical activity context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1299–1339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00761.x

41.

Hamilton

E. R.

Samek

D. R.

Keyes

McGue

M. K.

Iacono

W. G.

(2015). Identity development in a transracial environment: Racial/ethnic minority adoptees in Minnesota. Adoption Quarterly, 18(3), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2015.1013593

42.

Hayes

A. F

. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.

43.

Hernandez

I. A.

Silverman

D. M.

Destin

(2021). From deficit to benefit: Highlighting lower SES students’ background-specific strengths reinforces their academic persistence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 92, 104080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104080

44.

Hill

M. L.

Plitnick

(2021). Except for Palestine: The limits of progressive politics. The New Press.

45.

Hooks

(2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto Press.

46.

Hope

E. C.

Cryer-Coupet

Q. R.

Stokes

M. N.

(2020). Race-related stress, racial identity, and activism among young Black men: A person-centered approach. Developmental Psychology, 56(8), 1484–1495. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000836

47.

Hughes

Rodriguez

Smith

E. P.

Johnson

D. J.

Stevenson

H. C.

Spicer

(2006). Parents’ ethnic-racial socialization practices: A review of research and directions for future study. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.747

48.

International Association of Genocide Scholars (2025, August 31). IAGS Resolution on the Situation in Gaza. International Association of Genocide Scholars. https://genocidescholars.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/IAGS-Resolution-on-Gaza-FINAL.pdf. Accessed on August 1, 2025.

49.

International Court of Justice. (2024). South Africa v. Israel, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip. https://www.icj-cij.org/node/203447. Accessed on August 1, 2025.

50.

Jeong

H. Y.

Vollhardt

J. R.

Twali

M. S.

(2025). Power and resistance: Black Americans’ multifaceted perceptions of ingroup strengths and their effects on collective efficacy and resistance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 64(3), e12904. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12904

51.

Jeong

H. Y.

Vollhardt

J. R.

Twali

M. S.

Tawa

(2024). Different power perceptions based on socially situated needs: Findings from a qualitative study among Asian Americans. British Journal of Social Psychology, 63(4), 2135–2157. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12777

52.

Khatib

McKee

Yusuf

(2024). Counting the dead in Gaza: difficult but essential. Lancet, 404(10449), 237–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01169-3

53.

Kim

C. J.

(1999). The racial triangulation of Asian Americans. Politics & Society, 27(1), 105–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329299027001005

54.

Klandermans

P. G.

(2014). Identity politics and politicized identities: Identity processes and the dynamics of protest. Political Psychology, 35(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12167

55.

A. H.

Noland

E. S.

Monteith

M. J.

(2025). Following prejudiced behavior, confrontation restores local anti-bias social norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51(12), 2389–2404. https://doi-org.ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu/10.1177/01461672241229006

56.

Louis

Thomas

McGarty

Lizzio-Wilson

Amiot

Moghaddam

(2020). The volatility of collective action: Theoretical analysis and empirical data. Political Psychology, 41(Suppl. 1), 35–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12671

57.

Macías Mejía

Y. D

. (2024). Beyond racial linked fate: Inter-minority political solidarity and political participation. Political Behavior, 46(2), 1101–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2

58.

Markus

Kunda

(1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 858–866. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.858

59.

Marsh

H. W.

(1993). Academic self-concept: Theory measurement and research. In Suls

(Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59–98). Erlbaum.

60.

Mashek

D. J.

Aron

Boncimino

(2003). Confusions of self with close others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250220

61.

McRoy

R. G.

Zurcher

L. A.

Lauderdale

M. L.

Anderson

R. E.

(1984). The identity of transracial adoptees. Social Casework, 65(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438948406500105

62.

Memmi

(1968). Dominated man: Notes towards a portrait. Beacon Press.

63.

Mosley

D. V.

Hargons

C. N.

Meiller

Angyal

Wheeler

Davis

Stevens-Watkins

(2021). Critical consciousness of anti-Black racism: A practical model to prevent and resist racial trauma. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(1), 1–16.

64.

Mosley

D. V.

Neville

H. A.

Chavez-Dueñas

N. Y.

Adames

H. Y.

Lewis

J. A.

French

B. H.

(2020). Radical hope in revolting times: Proposing a culturally relevant psychological framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(1), Article e12512. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12512

65.

Nobles

W. W.

(1976). Extended self: Rethinking the so-called Negro self-concept. Journal of Black Psychology, 2(2), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/009579847600200205

66.

Oyserman

Lee

S. W.

(2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311

67.

Park

L. E.

Maner

J. K.

(2009). Does self-threat promote social connection? The role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013933

68.

Pérez

Cobian

(2024). Latino opinion and action in the struggle for America’s political future. Annual Review of Political Science, 27, 87–106.

69.

Pérez

Alhambra

Nguy

J. H.

Bielskis

Chabane

Gudino

Katz

Liu

Mojica

Zhou

(2024). System justification drives Latino support for nativist policies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27(8), 1818–1834. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241245383

70.

Pérez

Goldman

S. K.

Huo

Y. J.

Nteta

Tropp

L. R.

(2025). Are solidarity and identification as people of color distinct? Validating new measures across Asian, Black, Latino, and Multiracial Americans. Political Science Research and Methods, 13(4), 962–978. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.61

71.

Pham

M. D.

Chaney

K. E

Garr-Schultz

(2025). Strength-based solidarity: Shared strengths as a novel pathway toward sustainable, holistic, and health-promoting intraminority solidarity. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868325139276

72.

Pham

M. D.

Chaney

K. E.

Sanchez

D. T.

(2023). “I am (oppressed), therefore I see”: Multiple stigmatized identities predict belief in generalized prejudice and intraminority coalition. Self and Identity, 22(6), 1000–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2023.2216941

73.

Pietri

E. S.

Moser

C. E.

Derricks

Johnson

I. R.

(2024). A framework for understanding effective allyship. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3(10), 686–700. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00359-0

74.

Pinedo

Diemer

M. A.

Frisby

M. B.

(2024). Critical consciousness and youth political activism. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 6, 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-010923-113449

75.

Postmes

Rabinovich

Morton

van Zomeren

(2014). Toward sustainable social identities: Including our collective future into the self-concept. In van Trijp

H. C. M.

(Ed.), Encouraging sustainable behavior: Psychology and the environment (pp. 185–201). Psychology Press.

76.

Rogers

L. O.

Cordova-Lopez

(2025). Prioritizing marginality and resistance in racial identity research. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 7(1), 289–313.

77.

Ross

B. Z.

Lee

Cokley

(2025). Black identity in action: Examining ethnic and racial identity, racial discrimination, and collective action among black individuals. Journal of Black Psychology, 51(5), 555–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/00957984251322390

78.

Rutledge

J. D.

(2023). Exploring the role of empowerment in Black women’s HIV and AIDS activism in the United States: An integrative literature review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(3–4), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12644

79.

Said

E. W.

(1980). The question of Palestine. Vintage Books.

80.

Sanchez

G. R.

(2006). The role of group consciousness in Latino public opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 59(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900311

81.

Sanchez

G. R.

Vargas

E. D.

(2016). Taking a closer look at group identity: The link between theory and measurement of group consciousness and linked fate. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915624571

82.

Sani

Bowe

Herrera

Manna

Cossa

Miao

Zhou

(2007). Perceived collective continuity: Seeing groups as entities that move through time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1118–1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.430

83.

Sellers

R. M.

Rowley

S. A. J.

Chavous

T. M.

Shelton

J. N.

Smith

M. A

. (1997). Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity: A preliminary investigation of reliability and constuct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.805

84.

Selvanathan

H. P.

Salter

P. S.

(2025). The power of Black resilience. In The power of collective resilience against political violence and repression (pp. 124–144). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032708492-10

85.

Selvanathan

H. P.

Jetten

Umeh

(2023). A history of collective resilience and collective victimhood: Two sides of the same coin that explain Black Americans’ present-day responses to oppression. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(1), 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12562

86.

Showers

C. J.

Abramson

L. Y.

Hogan

M. E.

(1998). The dynamic self: How the content and structure of the self-concept change with mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.478

87.

Showers

C. J.

Ditzfeld

C. P.

Zeigler-Hill

(2015). Self-concept structure and the quality of self-knowledge. Journal of Personality, 83(5), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12130

88.

Shrira

Wisman

Noguchi

(2018). Diversity of historical ancestry and personality traits across 56 cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 128, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.013

89.

Silverman

D. M.

Rosario

R. J.

Hernandez

I. A.

Destin

(2023). The ongoing development of strength-based approaches to people who hold systemically marginalized identities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221145243

90.

Sim

Kim

S. Y.

Suh

(2022). Sample size requirements for simple and complex mediation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82(1), 76–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644211003261

91.

Smeekes

Verkuyten

(2013). Collective self-continuity, group identification and in-group defense. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 984–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.004

92.

Syliongtay

A. L. N.

Villanueva

M. O. D.

Yang

R. I. S.

de Guzman

J. M.

(2022). Embracing my jihad: An intersectional approach to understanding Muslim Filipino women activists’ construction of the self as agents of change. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 28(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000590

93.

Syropoulos

Markowitz

E. M.

(2021). Prosocial responses to COVID-19: Examining the role of gratitude, fairness and legacy motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110488

94.

Thai

Nylund

J. L.

(2024). What are they in it for? Marginalised group members’ perceptions of allies differ depending on the costs and rewards associated with their allyship. British journal of social psychology, 63(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12670

95.

van Zomeren

Kutlaca

Turner-Zwinkels

. (2018). Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 122–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347

96.

van Zomeren

Postmes

Spears

. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x

97.

Vignoles

V. L.

Regalia

Manzi

Golledge

Scabini

(2006). Beyond self-esteem: Influence of multiple motives on identity construction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 308–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.308

98.

Vollhardt

J. R.

Konushevci

Macedonci

Lee

(2024). Never again: Lessons of genocide in survivor testimonies from the Holocaust, Nanjing massacre and Rwandan genocide. European Journal of Social Psychology. 54, 1577–1592 https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3108

99.

Wade-Benzoni

K. A.

(2019). Legacy motivations & the psychology of intergenerational decisions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.03.013

100.

Wedell

Chaney

K. E.

(2025). Flexible confronters, informative confronters, and low stakes prodders: A person-centered approach to prejudice confrontation styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 233, 112904.

101.

Yosso

T. J.

(2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006

102.

Zaval

Markowitz

E. M.

Weber

E. U.

(2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for the sake of one’s legacy. Psychological Science, 26(2), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614561266

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.88 MB