Prior research established positive ties between intimate partners’ self-esteem (SE) and support interactions, but evidence on whether intraindividual changes in SE and supportive dyadic coping are associated over time remains scarce. The present study tested prominent theories suggesting a reciprocal prospective relationship between SE, one’s own and partner’s supportive dyadic coping using 14 waves of nationally representative data totaling 13,683 young adults from Germany. We used random intercept cross-lagged panel models for data analysis. Our findings revealed significant reciprocal within-person transactions between SE, one’s own and partner’s dyadic coping over time. We conclude that high SE may boost positive support interactions in intimate relationships. At the same time, giving and receiving positive support in times of stress may strengthen intimate partners’ SE on the long run. Overall, our findings provide robust evidence that people’s support interactions and SE development go hand in hand within the context of intimate partner relationships.
BodenmannG. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 34–49.
3.
BodenmannG. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In RevensonT.A.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–49). American Psychological Association.
4.
BodenmannG. (2008). Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). Test manual. Huber.
5.
BodenmannG.CinaA. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 44(1–2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v44n01_04
6.
BodenmannG.RandallA. K.FalconierM. K. (2016). Coping in couples: The Systemic Transactional Model (STM). In FalconierM. K.RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 5–22). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
7.
BrownS. L.NesseR. M.VinokurA. D.SmithD. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14(4), 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.14461
8.
BrüderlJ.DrobničS.HankK.NeyerF.J.WalperS.WolfC.AltP.BauerI.BöhmS.BorschelE.BozoyanC.ChristmannP.EdingerR.EigenbrodtF.GarrettM.GeisslerS.Gonzalez AvilésT.GröplerN.GummerT.. . . WetzelM. (2024). The German Family Panel (pairfam). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5678 Data file Version 14.2.0. doi.org/10.4232/pairfam.5678.14.2.0
9.
CameronJ. J.GrangerS. (2019). Does self-esteem have an interpersonal imprint beyond self-reports? A meta-analysis of self-esteem and objective interpersonal indicators. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(1), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318756532
10.
CutronaC.BodenmannG.RandallA. K.ClavélF. D.JohnsonM. (2018). Stress, dyadic coping, and social support: Moving toward Integration. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 341–352). Cambridge University Press.
11.
de MoorE. L.DenissenJ. J. A.EmonsW. H. M.BleidornW.LuhmannM.OrthU.ChungJ. M. (2021). Self-esteem and satisfaction with social relationships across time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(1), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000379
12.
DenissenJ. J. A.PenkeL.SchmittD. P.van AkenM. A. G. (2008). Self-esteem reactions to social interactions: Evidence for sociometer mechanisms across days, people, and nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.181
13.
DowneyG.FreitasA. L.MichaelisB.KhouriH. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 545–560. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.545
14.
ErolR. Y.OrthU. (2016). Self-esteem and the quality of romantic relationships. European Psychologist, 21, 274–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000259
15.
FalconierM. K.JacksonJ. B.HilpertP.BodenmannG. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
16.
FalconierM. K.KuhnR. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571
17.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
18.
HarrisM. A.OrthU. (2020). The link between self-esteem and social relationships: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1459–1477. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000265
19.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
20.
HuininkJ.BrüderlJ.NauckB.WalperS.CastiglioniL.FeldhausM. (2011). Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 23(1), 77–101. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-376463
21.
JohnsonM. D.GalambosN. L.FinnC.NeyerF. J.HorneR. M. (2017). Pathways between self-esteem and depression in couples. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000276
22.
KelleyH. H. (1984). The theoretical description of interdependence by means of transition lists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 956–982. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.956
23.
KirkpatrickL. A.EllisB. J. (2006). The adaptive functions of self-evaluative psychological mechanisms. In KernisM. H. (Ed.), Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 334–339). Psychology Press.
24.
LandoltS. A.WeitkampK.RothM.SissonN. M.BodenmannG. (2023). Dyadic coping and mental health in couples: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 106, Article 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102344
25.
LarsonR.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2014). The experience sampling method. In CsikszentmihalyiM. (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 21–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_2
26.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1(3), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010304 (Original work published 1987)
27.
LearyM. R. (2012). Sociometer theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 141–159). Sage.
28.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9
29.
MacDonaldG.LearyM. R. (2012). Individual differences in self-esteem. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 354–377). Guilford Press.
30.
MarigoldD. C.CavalloJ. V.HirniakA. (2020). Subjective perception or objective reality? How recipients’ self-esteem influences perceived and actual provider responsiveness in support contexts. Self and Identity, 19(6), 673–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1652681
31.
MeierF.LandoltS. A.BradburyT. N.BodenmannG. (2021). Equity of dyadic coping in patients with depression and their partners. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 40(3), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2021.40.3.249
32.
MurrayS. L.DerrickJ. L.LederS.HolmesJ. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429
33.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
34.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W.BellaviaG.RoseP. (2001). The mismeasure of love: How self-doubt contaminates relationship beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012740
35.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
36.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
37.
RentzschK.Schröder-AbéM. (2022). Top down or bottom up? Evidence from the longitudinal development of global and domain-specific self-esteem in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(4), 714–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000393
38.
RichterJ.FinnC. (2021). Transactions between self-esteem and perceived conflict in romantic relationships: A 5-year longitudinal study. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0248620. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248620
39.
RobinsR. W. (2021). Naturalizing the self. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4th ed., pp. 561–586). The Guilford Press.
40.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent child. Princeton University Press.
41.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R Package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
42.
RusuP. P.HilpertP.TurliucM. N.BodenmannG. (2016). Dyadic coping in an Eastern European context: Validity and measurement invariance of the Romanian Version of dyadic coping inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(4), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175616664009
43.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
44.
SchaferJ. L.GrahamJ. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147
45.
SowisloJ. F.OrthU. (2013). Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028931
46.
SrivastavaS.BeerJ. S. (2005). How self-evaluations relate to being liked by others: Integrating sociometer and attachment perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 966–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.966
47.
ŞtefǎnuţA. M.VintilǎM.TudorelO. I. (2021). The relationship of dyadic coping with emotional functioning and quality of the relationship in couples facing cancer—A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 594015.
48.
VriezeS. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027127
49.
WeberE.HülürG. (2021). Affect contagion in daily life is mediated by perceptions of partner affect: An experience-sampling study with older couples. Emotion, 21(8), 1699–1711. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001043
50.
WeberE.HopwoodC. J.DenissenJ. J. A.BleidornW. (2026). Self-Esteem and Sexual Experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 52(2), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241257355
51.
WeberE.HopwoodC. J.NissenA. T.BleidornW. (2023). Disentangling self-concept clarity and self-esteem in young adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(6), 1420–1441. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000460
52.
WeitkampK.FegerF.LandoltS. A.RothM.BodenmannG. (2021). Dyadic coping in couples facing chronic physical illness: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 722740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722740
53.
ZhangL.GuW.JingX.ZhiS.ZhouN.ZhangL.WangW.JiangY. (2023). Predicting the dyadic coping through self-esteem among infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: An actor-partner interdependence model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1127464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127464
