Time poverty, a persistent feeling of insufficient time, significantly affects interpersonal dynamics, particularly help-seeking and help-giving. Across five studies using hypothetical scenarios (Studies 1a and 1b), academic (Study 2), and everyday contexts (Study 3), we found that time poverty consistently fosters a mismatch wherein individuals’ help-seeking behaviors exceed their willingness to provide help, regardless of task interdependence (Studies 1a and 1b). Zero-sum beliefs about time emerge as a key mediator explaining the effect of time poverty on this imbalance, a mechanism substantiated by both correlational (Studies 2 and 3) and causal (Study 4) evidence. Moreover, findings reveal that time poverty reduces both help-provider’s and help-seeker’s preference for autonomy-oriented help relative to dependency-oriented help (Studies 1b and 3), suggesting an additional adverse consequence for personal growth and development.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
Andrews-FearonP.DavidaiS. (2023). Is status a zero-sum game? Zero-sum beliefs increase people’s preference for dominance but not prestige. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(2), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001282
4.
BambergerP. A.LeviR. (2009). Team-based reward allocation structures and the helping behaviors of outcome-interdependent team members. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(4), 300–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910952705
5.
BeehrT. A.JexS. M.StacyB. A.MurrayM. A. (2000). Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(4), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200006)21:4
6.
BellezzaS.PahariaN.KeinanA. (2017). Conspicuous consumption of time: When busyness and lack of leisure time become a status symbol. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw076
7.
BosterF.FediukT.Ryan KotowskiM. (2001). The effectiveness of an altruistic appeal in the presence and absence of favors. Communication Monographs, 68(4), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128074
8.
BurleighT. J.RubelA. N.MeeganD. V. (2017). Wanting “the whole loaf”: Zero-sum thinking about love is associated with prejudice against consensual non-monogamists. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(1–2), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2016.1269020
9.
Chernyak-HaiL.DavidaiS. (2022). “Do not teach them how to fish”: The effect of zero-sum beliefs on help giving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(10), 2466–2480. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001196
10.
ConnellyC. E.FordD. P.TurelO.GallupeB.ZweigD. (2014). “I’m busy (and competitive)!” Antecedents of knowledge sharing under pressure. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.61
11.
DarleyJ. M.BatsonC. D. (1973). “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034449
DoréB. P.MorrisR. R.BurrD. A.PicardR. W.OchsnerK. N. (2017). Helping others regulate emotion predicts increased regulation of one’s own emotions and decreased symptoms of depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(5), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217695558
14.
EatoughE. M.ChangC.-H.MiloslavicS. A.JohnsonR. E. (2011). Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021887
15.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 699–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01244.x
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
17.
FehrE.GachterS. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.
18.
FinkelsteinM. A. (2012). Individualism/collectivism and organizational citizenship behavior: An integrative framework. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(10), 1633–1643. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.10.1633
19.
FosterG. M. (1965). Peasant society and the image of limited good. American Anthropologist, 67(2), 293–315.
20.
GärlingT.GambleA.ForsF.HjermM. (2016). Emotional well-being related to time pressure, impediment to goal progress, and stress-related symptoms. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(5), 1789–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9670-4
21.
GershunyJ. (2005). Busyness as the badge of honor for the new superordinate working class. Social Research, 72(2), 287–314.
22.
GhasemiF.BeversdorfD. Q.HermanK. C. (2024). Stress and stress responses: A narrative literature review from physiological mechanisms to intervention approaches. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909241289222
23.
GiurgeL. M.WhillansA. V.WestC. (2020). Why time poverty matters for individuals, organisations and nations. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(10), 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0920-z
24.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
GrodalS.NelsonA. J.SiinoR. M. (2015). Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. The Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 136–168.
27.
HomansG. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.
28.
HuiB. P. H.NgJ. C. K.BerzaghiE.Cunningham-AmosL. A.KoganA. (2020). Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146(12), 1084–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000298
29.
JiangX.ZhangN.SunX.LiuZ.WangY. L. (2024). Being pressed for time leads to treating others as things: Exploring the relationships among time scarcity, agentic and communal orientation and objectification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 63(3), 1318–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12729
30.
KakkarH.SivanathanN. (2022). The impact of leader dominance on employees’ zero-sum mindset and helping behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(10), 1706–1724. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000980
31.
KarabenickS. A.KnappJ. R. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.221
32.
KellyE. L.MoenP.TranbyE. (2011). Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411400056
33.
KiggunduM. N. (1983). Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31(2), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90118-6
34.
KimJ. C.WadhwaM.ChattopadhyayA. (2019). When busy is less indulging: Impact of busy mindset on self-control behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 933–952. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy069
35.
KochS.HollandR. W.van KnippenbergA. (2008). Regulating cognitive control through approach-avoidance motor actions. Cognition, 109(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.014
36.
KouY.HongH.TanC.LiL. (2007). Revision of adolescent prosocial tendency scale. Psychological Development and Education, 23(1), 112–117.
37.
LanajK.GabrielA. S.ChawlaN. (2021). The self-sacrificial nature of leader identity: Understanding the costs and benefits at work and home. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000505
38.
LazarusR. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. McGraw-Hill.
39.
LiZ.LiN.SunX. (2025). Time poverty inhibits employees’ knowledge sharing by suppressing their future orientation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2025.2488883
40.
MaJ.ChenY.MengM.PengH.GanY. (2025). Short-term dynamic changes in mental well-being under stress: Exploring trajectories with latent growth model analysis. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909251352771
41.
MakiA.VitriolJ. A.DwyerP. C.KimJ. S.SnyderM. (2017). The helping orientations inventory: Measuring propensities to provide autonomy and dependency help. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2267
42.
MenziesH. (2005). Globalism as daily regime: On-line pressures leave no time for real-life relationships. CCPA Monitor, 12(2), 12–14.
MullainathanS.ShafirE. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Henry Holt.
45.
NadlerA. (2002). Inter-group helping relations as power relations: Maintaining or challenging social dominance between groups through helping. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00272
46.
NguyenC.FaulknerM.YangS.WilliamsJ.TongL. (2022). Mind the gap: Understanding the gap between intentions and behaviour in the charity context. Journal of Business Research, 148, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.044
47.
NiiyaY. (2019). My time, your time, or our time? Time perception and its associations with interpersonal goals and life outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(5), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0007-y
48.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 215–218.
OishiS.GrahamJ. (2010). Social ecology: Lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610374588
PerlowL. A. (1999). The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667031
53.
PirlottA. G.MacKinnonD. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012
54.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
55.
RappA. A.BachrachD. G.RappT. L. (2013). The influence of time management skill on the curvilinear relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031733
56.
RobertsR.DavidaiS. (2022). The psychology of asymmetric zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(3), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000378
57.
RoczniewskaM.WojciszkeB. (2021). Reducing hindering job demands: The role of belief in life as a zero-sum game and workload. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10036. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910036
58.
RoxburghS. (2004). “There just aren’t enough hours in the day”: The mental health consequences of time pressure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(2), 115–131.
59.
Różycka-TranJ.BoskiP.WojciszkeB. (2015). Belief in a zero-sum game as a social axiom: A 37-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115572226
60.
Sánchez RosasJ.PérezE. (2015). Measuring threats, benefits, emotional costs and avoidance of academic help-seeking in Argentinian university students. Pensamiento Psicológico, 13(2), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI13-2.mtbe
61.
SettoonR. P.MossholderK. W. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.255
SirolaN.PitesaM. (2017). Economic downturns undermine workplace helping by promoting a zero-sum construal of success. The Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1339–1359.
64.
ŠkerlavajM.ConnellyC. E.CerneM.DysvikA. (2018). Tell me if you can: Time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(7), 1489–1509. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2017-0179
65.
SullivanO. (2008). Busyness, status distinction and consumption strategies of the income rich, time poor. Time & Society, 17(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X07086307
66.
TaylorS. E.ShermanD. K.KimH. S.JarchoJ.TakagiK.DunaganM. S. (2004). Culture and social support: Who seeks it and why?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.354
67.
Van Der RijtJ.Van Den BosscheP.Van De WielM. W. J.De MaeyerS.GijselaersW. H.SegersM. S. R. (2013). Asking for help: A relational perspective on help seeking in the workplace. Vocations and Learning, 6(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-012-9095-8
68.
WhillansA. (2019, January24). Time for happiness: Why the pursuit of money isn’t bringing you joy–and what will. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/01/time-for-happiness
69.
XiaW.van WijngaardenJ. D. H.HuijsmanR.Buljac-SamardžićM. (2024). The effect of long-term (im)balance of giving versus receiving support with nonrelatives on subjective well-being among home-dwelling older people. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 79(4), gbad198. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad198
70.
YakinS.NiiyaY. (2023). Time Perception Scale: Measurement invariance between the United States and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 27(3), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12594
71.
YanL. L.LiuK.MatthewsK. A.DaviglusM. L.FergusonT. F.KiefeC. I. (2003). Psychosocial factors and risk of hypertension: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. JAMA, 290(16), 2138–2148. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.16.2138
72.
YuanY.SunX. (2024). Can’t see the forest for the trees: Time poverty influences construal level and the moderating role of autonomous versus controlled motivation. British Journal of Social Psychology, bjso.12730. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12730
73.
ZhengX.ZhangQ. (2021). Being busy, feeling poor: Development and validation of the Perceived Time Poverty Scale (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3871027). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871027
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
