Most people are interested in improving themselves, but they show less interest in improving on moral traits. Why don’t people particularly want to be more moral, and why do people prioritize improving certain traits more than others? Across four preregistered studies of U.K.-based CloudResearch (NStudy 1 = 252; NSupplemental = 110) and Behavioral Research Lab (NStudy 2a = 303, NStudy 2b = 301) participants, we test four classes of explanations. Results rule out explanations based on the ideas that moral traits are seen as more difficult to change and as either more or less causally central. Instead, people are less interested in moral improvements because they believe (a) that they are already highly moral and (b) that nonmoral improvements would more effectively improve their happiness and goal attainment. These results clarify the perceived tradeoffs between well-being and morality and show that personal well-being is a central motivation for personality change.
BaranskiE.GardinerG.LeeD.FunderD. C. (2021). Who in the world is trying to change their personality traits? Volitional personality change among college students in six continents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121, 1140–1156. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000389
3.
BaraschA.LevineE. E.BermanJ. Z.SmallD. A. (2014). Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037207
4.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
5.
BaumeisterR. F.ExlineJ. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1165–1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00086
6.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.AakerJ. L.GarbinskyE. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830764
7.
BenchS. W.SchlegelR. J.DavisW. E.VessM. (2015). Thinking about change in the self and others: The role of self-discovery metaphors and the true self. Social Cognition, 33(3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.3.2
8.
BigmanY. E.TamirM. (2016). The road to heaven is paved with effort: Perceived effort amplifies moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(12), 1654. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000230
9.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.RusconiP.GoodwinG. P. (2021). The primacy of morality in impression development: Theory, research, and future directions. In GawronskiB. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 187–262). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.03.001
10.
ChenS. Y.UrminskyO.BartelsD. M. (2016). Beliefs about the causal structure of the self-concept determine which changes disrupt personal identity. Psychological Science, 27(10), 1398–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616656800
11.
ChoiJ.CatapanoR.ChoiI. (2017). Taking stock of happiness and meaning in everyday life: An experience sampling approach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678455
12.
De FreitasJ.CikaraM.GrossmannI.SchlegelR. (2018). Moral goodness is the essence of personal identity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 739–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.05.006
13.
DeYoungC. G.QuiltyL. C.PetersonJ. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
14.
DeYoungC. G.TiberiusV. (2023). Value fulfillment from a cybernetic perspective: A new psychological theory of well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221083777
15.
DwyerR. J.DunnE. W.HershfieldH. E. (2017). Cousins or conjoined twins: How different are meaning and happiness in everyday life?Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(2–3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1376580
16.
EffronD. A.MillerD. T. (2015). Do as I say, not as I’ve done: Suffering for a misdeed reduces the hypocrisy of advising others against it. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.004
17.
EpleyN.DunningD. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self-or social prediction?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861
18.
ErlandssonA.WingrenM.AnderssonP. A. (2020). Type and amount of help as predictors for impression of helpers. PLoS One, 15(12), e0243808. https://doi.org/10.0.5.91/journal.pone.0243808
19.
FurrR. M.PrenticeM.HawkinsParham A.JayawickremeE. (2022). Development and validation of the Moral Character Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 98, Article 104228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104228
20.
GaiP. J.BhattacharjeeA. (2022). Willpower as moral ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151, 1999–2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001169
21.
GanderF.WagnerL. (2024). Which positive personality traits do people want to change?. European Journal of Personality, 38(4), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231211957
22.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
23.
GoodwinG. P.PiazzaJ.RozinP. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726
24.
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013748
25.
HartleyA. G.FurrR. M.HelzerE. G.JayawickremeE.VelasquezK. R.FleesonW. (2016). Morality’s centrality to liking, respecting, and understanding others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 648–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616655359
26.
HeintzelmanS. J.KingL. A. (2019). Routines and meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(5), 688–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218795133
27.
HofmannW.MeindlP.MooijmanM.GrahamJ. (2018). Morality and self-control: How they are intertwined and where they differ. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418759317
HuangM.YangF. (2022). Self-transcendence or self-enhancement: People’s perceptions of meaning and happiness in relation to the self. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001297
30.
HudsonN. W.FraleyR. C. (2016). Changing for the better? Longitudinal associations between volitional personality change and psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216637840
31.
HudsonN. W.RobertsB. W. (2014). Goals to change personality traits: Concurrent links between personality traits, daily behavior, and goals to change oneself. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.008
32.
LandyJ. F.PiazzaJ.GoodwinG. P. (2016). When it’s bad to be friendly and smart: The desirability of sociability and competence depends on morality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1272–1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216655984
33.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
34.
MarshH. W.HuppertF. A.DonaldJ. N.HorwoodM. S.SahdraB. K. (2020). The well-being profile (WB-Pro): Creating a theoretically based multidimensional measure of well-being to advance theory, research, policy, and practice. Psychological Assessment, 32, 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000787
MoninB.JordanA. H. (2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. In NarvaezD. (Ed.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 341–354). Cambridge University Press.
O’ConnorK.EffronD. A.LucasB. J. (2020). Moral cleansing as hypocrisy: When private acts of charity make you feel better than you deserve. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 540–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000195
39.
OishiS.WestgateE. C. (2022). A psychologically rich life: Beyond happiness and meaning. Psychological Review, 129, 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000317
40.
OlivolaC. Y.ShafirE. (2013). The martyrdom effect: When pain and effort increase prosocial contributions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.767
41.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.
42.
PrinzingM.De FreitasJ.FredricksonB. L. (2022). The ordinary concept of a meaningful life: The role of subjective and objective factors in third-person attributions of meaning. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(5), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1897866
43.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
44.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
45.
SeligmanM. E. P. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Simon and Schuster.
46.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
47.
StrohmingerN.KnobeJ.NewmanG. (2017). The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616689495
SunJ.WiltJ.MeindlP.WatkinsH.GoodwinG. P. (2024). How and why people want to be more moral. Journal of Personality, 92(3), 907–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12812
51.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324.
52.
TappinB. M.McKayR. T. (2017). The illusion of moral superiority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 623–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616673878
53.
ThielmannI.de VriesR. E. (2021). Who wants to change and how? On the trait-specificity of personality change goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121, 1112–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000304
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
