Most people want to change some aspects of their personality, but does this phenomenon extend to moral character and to close others? Targets (n = 800) rated their personality traits and reported how much they wanted to change on each trait; well-acquainted informants (n = 958) rated targets’ personality traits and how much they wanted the targets to change on those same traits. Targets and informants reported a lower desire to change more morally relevant traits (e.g., honesty, compassion, fairness) compared with less morally relevant traits (e.g., anxiety, sociability, productiveness)—even after we controlled for current trait levels. Moreover, although targets generally wanted to improve more on traits that they had less desirable levels of, and informants wanted their targets to improve more on those traits as well, targets’ moral change goals were less calibrated to their current trait levels. Finally, informants wanted targets to change in similar ways, but to a lesser extent, than targets themselves did. These findings suggest that moral considerations take a back seat when it comes to self-improvement.
BaranskiE. N.MorseP. J.DunlopW. L. (2017). Lay conceptions of volitional personality change: From strategies pursued to stories told. Journal of Personality, 85, 285–299. doi:10.1111/jopy.12240
2.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
3.
BaumeisterR. F. (1994). The crystallization of discontent in the process of major life change. In HeathertonT. F.WeinbergerJ. L. (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 281–297). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10143-012
4.
BaumeisterR. F.ExlineJ. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67, 1165–1194. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00086
5.
BenchS. W.SchlegelR. J.DavisW. E.VessM. (2015). Thinking about change in the self and others: The role of self-discovery metaphors and the true self. Social Cognition, 33, 169–185. doi:10.1521/soco.2015.33.3.2
6.
BlantonH.JaccardJ. (2006). Arbitrary metrics in psychology. The American Psychologist, 61(1), 27–41. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.62
7.
BollichK. L.JohannetP. M.VazireS. (2011). In search of our true selves: Feedback as a path to self-knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 312. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00312
8.
ChristyA. G.KimJ.VessM.SchlegelR. J.HicksJ. A. (2017). The reciprocal relationship between perceptions of moral goodness and knowledge of others’ true selves. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 910–917. doi:10.1177/1948550617693061
9.
DeYoungC. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004
10.
DeYoungC. G.QuiltyL. C.PetersonJ. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
11.
FleesonW.FurrR. M.JayawickremeE.MeindlP.HelzerE. G. (2014). Character: The prospects for a personality-based perspective on morality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 178–191. doi:10.1111/spc3.12094
12.
FurrR. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267–1316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x
13.
GoodwinG. P. (2015). Moral character in person perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 38–44. doi:10.1177/0963721414550709
14.
GoodwinG. P.PiazzaJ.RozinP. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168. doi:10.1037/a0034726
15.
HaidtJ.RosenbergE.HomH. (2003). Differentiating diversities: Moral diversity is not like other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1–36. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02071.x
16.
HartleyA. G.FurrR. M.HelzerE. G.JayawickremeE.VelasquezK. R.FleesonW. (2016). Morality’s centrality to liking, respecting, and understanding others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 648–657. doi:10.1177/1948550616655359
17.
HudsonN. W.FraleyR. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490–507. doi:10.1037/pspp0000021
18.
HudsonN. W.FraleyR. C. (2016a). Changing for the better? Longitudinal associations between volitional personality change and psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 603–615. doi:10.1177/0146167216637840
19.
HudsonN. W.FraleyR. C. (2016b). Do people’s desires to change their personality traits vary with age? An examination of trait change goals across adulthood. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 847–856. doi:10.1177/1948550616657598
20.
HudsonN. W.RobertsB. W. (2014). Goals to change personality traits: Concurrent links between personality traits, daily behavior, and goals to change oneself. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 68–83. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.008
21.
KahaneG.EverettJ. A. C.EarpB. D.CaviolaL.FaberN. S.CrockettM. J.SavulescuJ. (2018). Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology. Psychological Review, 125, 131–164. doi:10.1037/rev0000093
LeisingD.ErbsJ.FritzU. (2010). The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 668–682. doi:10.1037/a0018771
24.
McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE.LoganR. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.221
25.
MeindlP.GrahamJ. (2014). Know thy participant: The trouble with nomothetic assumptions in moral psychology. In SarkissianH.WrightJ. C. (Eds.), Advances in experimental moral psychology (pp. 233–252). London, England: Bloomsbury. doi:10.5040/9781472594150.ch-012
26.
MoloukiS.BartelsD. M. (2017). Personal change and the continuity of the self. Cognitive Psychology, 93, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.006
27.
MuthénL.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
28.
PrenticeM.FurrR. M.HawkinsA. (2019). Introducing the Moral Characteristics Questionnaire. Manuscript in preparation.
29.
PrenticeM.JayawickremeE.HawkinsA.HartleyA.FurrR. M.FleesonW. (2019). Morality as a basic psychological need. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 449–460. doi:10.1177/1948550618772011
30.
QuintusM.EgloffB.WrzusC. (2017). Predictors of volitional personality change in younger and older adults: Response surface analyses signify the complementary perspectives of the self and knowledgeable others. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 214–228. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.08.001
31.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
32.
RiisJ.SimmonsJ. P.GoodwinG. P. (2008). Preferences for enhancement pharmaceuticals: The reluctance to enhance fundamental traits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 495–508. doi:10.1086/588746
33.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
34.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
35.
SchwitzgebelE. (2019). Aiming for moral mediocrity. Res Philosophica, 96, 347–368.
36.
ShermanR. A.SerfassD. G. (2015). The comprehensive approach to analyzing multivariate constructs. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 40–50. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.002
37.
SkitkaL. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 267–281. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00254.x
38.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143. doi:10.1037/pspp0000096
39.
StrohmingerN.KnobeJ.NewmanG. (2017). The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 551–560. doi:10.1177/1745691616689495
40.
TappinB. M.McKayR. T. (2017). The illusion of moral superiority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 623–631. doi:10.1177/1948550616673878
41.
VazireS.CarlsonE. N. (2011). Others sometimes know us better than we know ourselves. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 104–108. doi:10.1177/0963721411402478
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
