Social stereotypes have been linked with gender and racial disparities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Developing a domain identity in a STEM field is linked with persistence and success among students from negatively stereotyped groups. However, these students often report a conflict between their group and domain identities. Across two studies we apply balanced identity design theory and latent profile analysis (LPA) to understand how individuals navigate stereotypically incompatible identities. In Study 1, we find that novice STEM majors from negatively stereotyped groups are less likely to hold identity balance than their positively stereotyped counterparts. However, in a separate sample of students approaching graduation in Study 2, the groups converge; both predominantly achieving identity balance. LPA identified three predominant clusters of identity balanced students which differentially predicted academic achievement and well-being for negatively compared with positively stereotyped students. This underscores the importance of understanding balanced identities for addressing underrepresentation in STEM.
BeasleyM. A.FischerM. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3
2.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
5.
CrispR. J.TurnerR. N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021840
6.
CvencekD.GreenwaldA. G.MeltzoffA. N. (2012). Balanced Identity Theory: Review of evidence for implicit consistency in social cognition. In GawronskiB.StrackF. (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A unifying concept in social psychology (pp. 157–177). Guilford Press.
7.
CvencekD.MeltzoffA. N.MaddoxC. D.NosekB. A.RudmanL. A.DevosT.DunhamY.BaronA. S.SteffensM. C.LaneK.HorcajoJ.Ashburn-NardoL.QuinbyA.SrivastavaS. B.SchmidtK.AidmanE.TangE.FarnhamS.MellottD. S.. . .GreenwaldA. G. (2021). Meta-analytic use of Balanced Identity Theory to validate the Implicit Association Test. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220916631
8.
DevosT.TorresJ. A. C. (2007). Implicit identification with academic achievement among Latino college students: The role of ethnic identity and significant others. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701503432
ElissenA. M.HertroijsD. F.SchaperN. C.VrijhoefH. J.RuwaardD. (2016). Profiling patients’ healthcare needs to support integrated, person-centered models for long-term disease management. International Journal of Integrated Care, 16(2), Article 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2208
11.
EndendijkJ. J. (2023). A person-centered approach toward balanced gender identity in emerging adults: Associations with self-esteem and attitudes about education. Education Sciences, 13(4), Article 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040424
12.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
13.
GazleyJ. L.RemichR.Naffziger-HirschM. E.KellerJ.CampbellP. B.McGeeR. (2014). Beyond preparation: Identity, cultural capital, and readiness for graduate school in the biomedical sciences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 1021–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21164
14.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.RudmanL. A.FarnhamS. D.NosekB. A.MellottD. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3
15.
GreenwaldA. G.FarnhamS. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022–1038. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022
16.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
17.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
18.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
19.
HirshJ. B.KangS. K. (2016). Mechanisms of identity conflict: Uncertainty, anxiety, and the behavioral inhibition system. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315589475
20.
HoggM. A.TerryD. J.WhiteK. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787127
21.
LanzaS. T.CollinsL. M. (2008). A new SAS procedure for latent transition analysis: Transitions in dating and sexual risk behavior. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.446
22.
LondonB.RosenthalL.LevyS. R.LobelM. (2011). The influences of perceived identity compatibility and social support on women in nontraditional fields during the college transition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.614166
23.
MerollaD. M.SerpeR. T. (2013). STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: The role of science identity salience. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 575–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9233-7
24.
MillerD. I.EaglyA. H.LinnM. C. (2014). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005
25.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s Guide (Version 8). Muthén & Muthén.
NosekB. A.BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math [not equal to] me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.44
28.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
29.
RothJ.SteffensM. C.VignolesV. L. (2018). Group membership, group change, and intergroup attitudes: A recategorization model based on cognitive consistency principles. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 00479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00479
30.
RyffC. D.KeyesC. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
31.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.ForbesC. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
32.
SchultzP. W.HernandezP. R.WoodcockA.EstradaM.ChanceR. C.AguilarM.SerpeR. T. (2011). Patching the pipeline: Reducing educational disparities in the sciences through minority training programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710392371
33.
SettlesI. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261885
34.
StrykerS.SerpeR. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: Theory and research example. In IckesW.KnowlesE. (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior (vol. 119) (pp. 199–218). Springer.
35.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustonW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
36.
VeldmanJ.MeeussenL.Van LaarC. (2019). A social identity perspective on the social-class achievement gap: Academic and social adjustment in the transition to university. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(3), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218813442
37.
WooS. E.HofmansJ.WilleB.TayL. (2024). Person-Centered Modeling: Techniques for studying associations between people rather than variables. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646
38.
WoodcockA.HernandezP. R.EstradaM.SchultzP. W. (2012). The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentification and abandonment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029120
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
