The present research examined whether temporal fluctuations in context ethnic diversity account for current levels of implicit ethnic-American associations. Temporal fluctuations in ethnic diversity at the metropolitan level were assessed using data from four decennial U.S. censuses (1980–2010) and distinguishing three dimensions of context ethnic diversity (minority representation, variety, and integration). Project Implicit data (2011–2017) indexed the extent to which American identity was implicitly associated with European Americans over Asian Americans (i.e., American = White associations). Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling (N = 152,011, nested within 226 metropolitan areas). Steeper increases in the proportion of Asian Americans were related to weaker implicit (but stronger explicit) American = White associations. Increases in ethnic integration accounted for stronger implicit American = White associations when integration fluctuations reflected accelerating rather than decelerating trends. These results suggest that current levels of implicit ethnic-national associations are linked to complex patterns of ethnic diversity fluctuations.
BenjaminD. J.BergerJ. O.JohannessonM.NosekB. A.WagenmakersE. J.BerkR.. . . JohnsonV. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 6–10. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
2.
BiemannT.KearneyE. (2010). Size does matter: How varying group sizes in a sample affect the most common measures of group diversity. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 582–599.
3.
BudescuD. V.BudescuM. (2012). How to measure diversity when you must. Psychological Methods, 17, 215–227. doi:10.1037/a0027129
4.
CharlesworthT. E. S.BanajiM. R. (2019). Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes I. Long-term change from 2007–2016. Psychological Science, 30, 174–192. doi:10.1177/0956797618813087
5.
ChristO.SchmidK.LolliotS.SwartH.StolleD.TauschN.. . . HewstoneM. (2014). Context effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 3996–4000. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320901111
6.
CitrinJ.WongC.DuffB. (2001). The meaning of American national identity: Patterns of ethnic conflict and consensus. In AshmoreR. D.JussimL.WilderD. (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 71–100). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
Cohen-MarksM. A.FaughtJ. (2010). Perceptions of race relations in contexts of ethnic diversity and change. Sociological Perspectives, 53, 73–98. doi:10.1525/sop.2010.53.1.73
8.
ColbyS. L.OrtmanJ. M. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060. US Census Current Population Reports P25-1143.
9.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014a). More diverse yet less tolerant? How the increasingly diverse racial landscape affects White Americans’ racial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 750–761. doi:10.1177/0146167214524993
10.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014b). On the precipice of a ‘majority-minority’ America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25, 1189–1197. doi:10.1177/0956797614527113
11.
CraigM. A.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2018). The pitfalls and promise of increasing racial diversity: Threat, contact, and race relations in the 21st century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 188–193. doi:10.1177/0963721417727860
12.
CrawfordJ. T.BhatiaA. (2012). Birther nation: Political conservatism is associated with explicit and implicit beliefs that President Barack Obama is foreign. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12, 364–376: doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01279.x
13.
CrispR. J.TurnerR. N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 13, 242–266. doi:10.1037/a0021840
14.
DanboldF.HuoY. J. (2015). No longer ‘all-American’? Whites’ defensive reactions to their numerical decline. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 210–218. doi:10.1177/1948550614546355
15.
DevosT. (2008). Implicit attitudes 101: Theoretical and empirical insights. In CranoW. D.PrislinR. (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 61–84). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
16.
DevosT.AndersonK. J. (2019). Are we in or are we out? Ingroup prototypicality effects in implicit ethnic-American associations. Japanese Psychological Research, 61, 65–82. doi:10.1111/jpr.12232
17.
DevosT.BanajiM. R. (2005). American = White?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447–466. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447
18.
DevosT.GavinK.QuintanaF. J. (2010). Say “adios” to the American dream? The interplay between ethnic and national identity among Latino and Caucasian Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 37–49. doi:10.1037/a0015868
19.
DevosT.HengL. (2009). Whites are granted the American identity more swiftly than Asians: Disentangling the role of automatic and controlled processes. Social Psychology, 40, 192–201. doi:10.1027/1864-9335.40.4.192
20.
DevosT.MaD. S. (2008). Is Kate Winslet more American than Lucy Liu? The impact of construal processes on the implicit ascription of a national identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 191–215. doi:10.1348/014466607x224521
21.
DevosT.MaD. S. (2013). How ‘American’ is Barack Obama? The role of national identity in a historic bid for the White House. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 214–226. doi:10.1111/jasp.12069
22.
DevosT.MohamedH. (2014). Shades of American identity: Implicit relations between ethnic and national identities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 739–754. doi:10.1111/spc3.12149
23.
DevosT.SadlerM. (2019). Context diversity predicts the extent to which the American identity is implicitly associated with Asian Americans and European Americans. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 10, 182–193. doi:10.1037/aap0000149
24.
DixonJ. C. (2006). The ties that bind and those that don’t: Toward reconciling group threat and contact theories of prejudice. Social Forces, 84, 2179–2204. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0085
25.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
26.
Er-rafiyA.BrauerM. (2012). Increasing perceived variability reduces prejudice and discrimination: Theory and application. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 920–935. doi:10.1111/spc3.12000
27.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: 1. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
28.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228. doi:10.2307/20159363
29.
HehmanE.FlakeJ. K.CalanchiniJ. (2017). Disproportionate use of lethal force in policing is associated with regional racial biases of residents. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 393–401. doi:10.1177/1948550617711229
30.
HewstoneM. (2015). Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 417–438. doi:10.1111/josi.12120
31.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 297–350. doi:10.1017/S0140525X13001192
32.
HoeffelE. M.RastogiS.KimM. O.ShahidH. (2012). The Asian population: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs.
33.
HoxJ. J. (1998). Multilevel modeling: When and why. In BalderjahnI.MatharR.SchaderM. (Eds.), Classification, data analysis, and data highways (pp. 147–154). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
34.
HuynhQ.-L.DevosT.AltmanH. R. (2015). Boundaries of American identity: Relations between ethnic group prototypicality and policy attitudes. Political Psychology, 36, 449–468. doi:10.1111/pops.12189
35.
IcelandJ. (2004). Beyond Black and White: Metropolitan residential segregation in multi-ethnic America. Social Science Research, 33, 248–271. doi:10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00056-5
36.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
37.
KoopmansR.SchaefferM. (2015). Relational diversity and neighbourhood cohesion: Unpacking variety, balance and in-group size. Social Science Research, 53, 162–176. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.05.010
38.
LeeB. A.IcelandJ.Farrell (2014). Is ethnoracial residential integration on the rise? Evidence from metropolitan and micropolitan America since 1980. In LoganJ. R. (Ed.). Diversity and disparities: America enters a new century (pp. 415–456). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
LeeJ.BeanF. D. (2010). The diversity paradox: Immigration and the color line in twenty-first century America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
LeeS. J.WongN.-W. A.AlvarezA. N. (2009). The model minority and the perpetual foreigner: Stereotypes of Asian Americans. In TewariN.AlvarezA. N. (Eds.), Asian American psychology: Current perspectives (pp. 69–84). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
41.
LoganJ. R.XuZ.StultsB. J. (2014). Interpolating U.S. decennial census tract data from as early as 1970 to 2010: A longitudinal tract database. Professional Geographer, 66, 412–420. doi:10.1080/00330124.2014.905156
42.
LukeD. (2004). Multilevel modeling (Quantitative applications in the social sciences 07–143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
MaD. S.DevosT. (2014). Every heart beats true, for the Red, White, and blue: National identity predicts voter support. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 14, 22–45. doi:10.1111/asap.12025
44.
MariniM.SriramN.SchnabelK.MaliszewskiN.DevosT.EkehammarB.. . . NosekB. A. (2013). Overweight people have low levels of implicit weight bias, but overweight nations have high levels of implicit weight bias. PLoS ONE, 8, e83543.
45.
MillerK. P.BrewerM. B.ArbuckleN. L. (2009). Social identity complexity: Its correlates and antecedents. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 79–94. doi:10.1177/1368430208098778
46.
MukherjeeS.MolinaL. E.AdamsG. (2012). National identity and immigration policy: Concern for legality or ethnocentric exclusion?Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 12, 21–32. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01257.x
47.
NaiJ.NarayananJ.HernandezI.SavaniK. (2018). People in more racially diverse neighborhoods are more prosocial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 497–515. doi:10.1037/pspa0000103
48.
NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (2007). The implicit association test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In BarghJ. A. (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265–292). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
49.
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.HansenJ. J.DevosT.LindnerN. M.RanganathK. A.. . . BanajiM. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. doi:10.1080/10463280701489053
50.
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.SriramN.LindnerN. M.DevosT.AyalaA.. . . GreenwaldA. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106
51.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H.HanH. A. (2009). Conceptualizing personal and extrapersonal associations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 152–170. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00164.x
52.
PayneB. K.JacobyL. L.LambertA. J. (2005). Attitudes as accessibility bias: Dissociating automatic and controlled processes. In HassinR. R.UlemanJ. S.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 393–420). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
53.
PayneB. K.VuletichH. A.Brown-IannuzziJ. L. (2019). Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 11693–11698. doi:10.1073/pnas.1818816116
54.
PayneB. K.VuletichH. A.LundbergK. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 233–248. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568
55.
PehrsonS.GreenE. G. T. (2010). Who we are and who can join us: National identity content and entry criteria for new immigrants. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 695–716. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01671.x
56.
PiekutA.ValentineG. (2016). Perceived diversity and acceptance of minority ethnic groups in two urban contexts. European Sociological Review, 32, 339–354. doi:10.1093/esr/jcw011
57.
PutnamR. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137–174. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
58.
RaeJ. R.NewheiserA.-K.OlsonK. R. (2015). Exposure to racial out-groups and implicit race bias in the United States. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 535–543. doi:10.1177/1948550614567357
59.
RamosM. R.BennettM. R.MasseyD. S.HewstoneM. (2019). Humans adapt to social diversity over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 12244–12249. doi:10.1073/pnas.1818884116
RudmanL. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 79–82. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00279.x
62.
RydellR. J.HamiltonD. L.DevosT. (2010). Now they are American, now they are not: Valence as a determinant of the inclusion of African Americans in the American identity. Social Cognition, 28, 161–179. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.2.161
63.
SadlerM.DevosT. (2018). Ethnic diversity matters: Putting implicit associations between weapons and ethnicity in context. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Epub ahead of print 31October2018. doi:10.1177/1368430218796933
64.
SawyerJ.GampaA. (2018). Implicit and explicit racial attitudes changed during Black Lives Matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1039–1059. doi:10.1177/0146167218757454
65.
SchaefferM. (2013). Can competing diversity indices inform us about why ethnic diversity erodes social cohesion? A test of five diversity indices in Germany. Social Science Research, 42, 755–774. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.018
66.
SchildkrautD. J. (2007). Defining American identity in the twenty-first century: How much ‘there’ is there?The Journal of Politics, 69, 597–615. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00562.x
67.
SchildkrautD. J. (2011). Americanism in the twenty-first century: Public opinion in the age of immigration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
68.
SchmidK.Al RamiahA.HewstoneM. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25, 665–674. doi:10.1177/0956797613508956
69.
SchmidK.HewstoneM.Al RamiahA. (2013). Neighborhood diversity and social identity complexity: Implications for intergroup relations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 135–142. doi:10.1177/1948550612446972
70.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
71.
StolleD.SorokaS.JohnstonR. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Political Studies, 56, 57–75. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00717.x
72.
TadmorC. T.HongY.-y.ChaoM. M.WiruchnipawanF.WangW. (2012). Multicultural experiences reduce intergroup bias through epistemic unfreezing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 750–772. doi:10.1037/a0029719
73.
Theiss-MorseE. (2009). Who counts as an American? The boundaries of national identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
74.
WaldzusS.MummendeyA.WenzelM.WeberU. (2003). Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31–47.
75.
WestgateE. C.RiskindR. G.NosekB. A. (2015). Implicit preferences for straight people over lesbian women and gay men weakened from 2006 to 2013. Collabra: Psychology, 1, 1–10. doi:10.1525/collabra.18
76.
XuK.LofaroN.NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G. (2018). Asian American IAT 2004–2017. Retrieved from osf.io/cpmfk.
77.
YogeeswaranK.DasguptaN. (2010). Will the “real” American please stand up? The effect of implicit national prototypes on discriminatory behavior and judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1332–1345. doi:10.1177/0146167210380928
78.
YogeeswaranK.DasguptaN. (2014). Conceptions of national identity in a globalised world: Antecedents and consequences. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 189–227. doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.972081
79.
YogeeswaranK.DasguptaN.AdelmanL.EcclestonA.ParkerM. T. (2011). To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of white and non-white groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 908–914. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.010
80.
YogeeswaranK.DasguptaN.GomezC. (2012). A new American dilemma? The effect of ethnic identification and public service on the national inclusion of ethnic minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 691–705. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1894
81.
YogeeswaranK.DevosT.NashK. (2016). Understanding the nature, measurement, and utility of implicit intergroup biases. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 241–266). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82.
ZárateM. A.ShawM.MarquezJ. A.BiagasD.Jr. (2012). Cultural inertia: The effects of cultural change on intergroup relations and the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 634–645. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.014
83.
ZárateM. A.ShawM. P. (2010). The role of cultural inertia in reactions to immigration on the U.S./Mexico border. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 45–57. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01632.x
84.
ZerhouniO.RougierM.MullerD. (2016). ‘Who (really) is Charlie?’: French cities with lower implicit prejudice toward Arabs demonstrated larger participation rates in Charlie Hebdo rallies. International Review of Social Psychology, 29, 69–76. doi:10.5334/irsp.50
85.
ZouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 696–717. doi:10.1037/pspa0000080
