Despite knowing better, people often follow the opinions of others when making decisions. Although people in joint evaluation mode (i.e., comparing options side-by-side) anticipate feeling less culpable if things go wrong after following someone else’s suggestion, our research shows the opposite effect when they actually experience one of the options. Across multiple studies (n = 3,200), including four with real monetary consequences, we find that people feel more culpable when they go against their better judgment. This counterintuitive effect occurs because going against one’s better judgment increases thoughts about alternative, better decisions that could have been made, which amplify feelings of control over the situation. This effect occurs regardless of whether the input is solicited or unsolicited and is specific to situations where people go against their better judgment. It does not occur if people reject poor suggestions or follow input that aligns with their judgment.
AlickeM. D.BuckinghamJ.ZellE.DavisT. (2008). Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1371–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208321594
3.
AschS. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
4.
BonaccioS.DalalR. S. (2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001
5.
BoningerD. S.GleicherF.StrathmanA. (1994). Counterfactual thinking: From what might have been to what may be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 297–307.
6.
BulmanR. J.WortmanC. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(5), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.351
7.
DeelstraJ. T.PeetersM. C. W.SchaufeliW. B.StroebeW.ZijlstraF. R. H.Van DoornenL. P. (2003). Receiving instrumental support at work: When help is not welcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.324
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
HollisS.CampbellF. (1999). What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 319(7211), 670–674. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670
16.
HseeC. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 247–257.
17.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–208). Cambridge University Press.
18.
LachinJ. M. (2000). Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Controlled Clinical Trials, 21, 167–189.
19.
LiebermanA.DukeK. E.AmirO. (2019). How incentive framing can harness the power of social norms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.001
20.
MalterM. S.KimS. S.MetcalfeJ. (2021). Feelings of culpability: Just following orders versus making the decision oneself. Psychological Science, 32(5), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211002821
MarkmanK. D.McMullenM. N.ElizagaR. A.MizoguchiN. (2006). Counterfactual thinking and regulatory fit. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S193029750000231X
23.
McCaulK. D.VeltumL. G.BoyechkoV.CrawfordJ. J. (1990). Understanding attributions of victim blame for rape: Sex, violence, and foreseeability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00375.x
24.
McMullenM. N.MarkmanK. D.GavanskiI. (1995). Living in neither the best nor worst of all possible worlds: Antecedents and consequences of upward and downward counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 133–167). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
NascoS. A.MarshK. L. (1999). Gaining control through counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(5), 557–569.
26.
RenZ.(Bella) HartE.LevineE. E.SchweitzerM. E. (2022). The shared responsibility model of deception. Current Opinion in Psychology, 48, 101470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101470
27.
RoeseN. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 133–148.
28.
RoeseN. J.EpstudeK. (2017). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking: New evidence, new challenges, new insights. In OlsonJ. M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 1–79). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.001
SahS. (2019). Conflict of interest disclosure as a reminder of professional norms: Clients first!Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 154, 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.07.005
31.
SahS.FeilerD. (2020). Conflict of interest disclosure with high-quality advice: The disclosure penalty and the altruistic signal. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26, 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000215
32.
SahS.LoewensteinG.CainD. M. (2013). The burden of disclosure: Increased compliance with distrusted advice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030527
33.
SchotterA. (2003). Decision making with naive advice. The American Economic Review, 93(2), 196–201.
34.
SteffelM.WilliamsE. F. (2018). Delegating decisions: Recruiting others to make choices we might regret. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1015–1032. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx080
35.
SteffelM.WilliamsE. F.Perrmann-GrahamJ. (2016). Passing the buck: Delegating choices to others to avoid responsibility and blame. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 135, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.04.006
36.
WoolleyK.RisenJ. L. (2018). Closing your eyes to follow your heart: Avoiding information to protect a strong intuitive preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000100
37.
WortmanC. B. (1975). Some determinants of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076305
38.
YeomansM. (2019). Some hedonic consequences of perspective-taking in recommending. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1050
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
