Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We examined the influence of proxy-assistance on exercisers' social cognitions and behavior. Fifty-six fitness class participants reported preference for proxy-assistance and reacted to exercising in different contexts. A 2 (proxy-led vs self-managed exercise context) by 2 (preferred assistance) MANOVA revealed significant assistance by context interactions for self-regulatory efficacy (SRE) and difficulty. Regarding self-managed exercise, high-assistance individuals expressed lower SRE and higher difficulty. Chi-square analysis revealed that significantly fewer high-assistance participants chose self-managed exercise. A one-way MANOVA on preferred assistance indicated that high-assistance participants were less confident, satisfied and perceived their self-managed exercise as more difficult. Results support Bandura's theorizing that use of a proxy can limit SRE of those preferring the proxy's control of their behavior.

Keywords

difficulty efficacy exercise choices proxy-agency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baltes, P. B. , & Baltes, M. M. (Eds.). (1990). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective . Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1—26.

Brawley, L.R. , Rejeski, W.J. , & King, A.C. (2003). Promoting physical activity for older adults: The challenges of changing behavior. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25, 172—183.

Bray, S.R. , & Cowan, H. (2002). Personal and proxy efficacy beliefs as predictors of exercise enjoyment and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation [Abstract]. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(Suppl.), S37.

Bray, S.R. , & Cowan, H. (2004). Proxy-efficacy: Implications for self-efficacy and exercise intentions in cardiac rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 71—75.

Bray, S.R. , Gyurcsik, N.C. , Culos-Reed, S.N. , Dawson, K.A. , & Martin, K.A. (2001). An exploratory investigation of the relationship between proxy efficacy, self-efficacy and exercise attendance. Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 425—434.

Bray, S.R. , Gyurscik, N.C. , Martin Ginis, K.A. , & Culos-Reed, S.N. (2004). The Proxy Efficacy Exercise Questionnaire: Development of an instrument to assess female exercisers' proxy efficacy beliefs in structured group exercise classes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 442—456.

Lent, R.W. , & Lopez, F.G. (2002). Cognitive ties that bind: A tripartite view of efficacy beliefs in growth-promoting relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 256—283.

10.

Meichenbaum, D. , & Turk, D.C. (1987). Facilitating treatment adherence: A practitioner's guidebook. New York: Plenum Press .

11.

Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Shields, C.A. , & Brawley, L.R. (2004). Is preference for proxy-contact linked to less self-efficacy and greater proxy dependence? The dilemma of relying on the exercise instructor [Abstract]. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26 (Suppl.), S168.

13.

Shields, C.A. , & Brawley, L.R. (2006). Preferring proxy-agency: Impact on self-efficacy for exercise. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 904—914.

14.

Tabachnick, B.G. , & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multi-variate statistics, 3rd edn. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.

Limiting Exercise Options

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References