The probability of cross-class contact between individuals from different social classes is significantly lower than that of random chance contact. However, it remains unclear whether individuals from lower or higher social classes are more reluctant to engage in cross-class contact. This study found that individuals with a lower subjective social class (SSC) were less willing to engage in cross-class contact than those with a higher SSC (Studies 1–2). This disparity in willingness persists even after controlling for expression bias and can be explained by negative contact expectations (Study 3). By manipulating negative contact expectations, a substantial increase in willingness to engage in such interactions can be achieved (Study 4). By focusing on the relationship between SSC and willingness for cross-class contact, this study has profound implications for enhancing intergroup interactions and assisting individuals with a low SSC in overcoming social challenges.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
2.
AlmaatouqA.KrafftP.DunhamY.RandD. G.PentlandA. (2020). Turkers of the world unite: Multilevel in-group bias among crowdworkers on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619837002
3.
AndersenR.CurtisJ. (2015). Social class, economic inequality, and the convergence of policy preferences: Evidence from 24 modern democracies. Canadian Review of Sociology, 52(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12077
4.
ÁrnadóttirK.BaysuG.Van LaarC.PhaletK.TroppL. R.SebbenS.UllrichJ.HässlerT. (2024). How positive and negative intergroup contact jointly inform minority support for social change: The role of system-fairness beliefs. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 63(2), 811–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12705
5.
BenziesK. M.AllenM. N. (2001). Symbolic interactionism as a theoretical perspective for multiple method research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(4), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01680.x
6.
CareyR. M.MarkusH. R. (2017). Social class shapes the form and function of relationships and selves. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.031
7.
CareyR. M.StephensN. M.TownsendS. S. M.HamedaniM. G. (2022). Is diversity enough? Cross-race and cross-class interactions in college occur less often than expected, but benefit members of lower status groups when they occur. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(5), 889–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219885163
8.
ChenB.ZhangC.FengF.XianH.ZhaoY. (2024). The association between social class and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Social Science & Medicine, 340, 116432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116432
9.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173
10.
ChettyR.JacksonM. O.KuchlerT.StroebelJ.HendrenN.FlueggeR. B.GongS.GonzalezF.GrondinA.JacobM.JohnstonD.KoenenM.Laguna-MuggenburgE.MudekerezaF.RutterT.ThorN.TownsendW.ZhangR.BaileyM.. . .WernerfeltN. (2022). Social capital I: Measurement and associations with economic mobility. Nature, 608(7921), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04996-4
11.
ConnorP.VarneyJ.KeltnerD.ChenS. (2021). Social class competence stereotypes are amplified by socially signaled economic inequality. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220916640
12.
CôtéS.KrausM. W.CarpenterN. C.PiffP. K.BeermannU.KeltnerD. (2017). Social affiliation in same-class and cross-class interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 146(2), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000258
DorroughA. R.GlöcknerA.HellmannD. M.EbertI. (2015). The development of ingroup favoritism in repeated social dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 476.
EmeryL. F.FinkelE. J. (2022). Connect or protect? Social class and self-protection in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(4), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000368
17.
FinchilescuG.TredouxC.MynhardtJ.PillayJ.MuiangaL. (2007). Accounting for lack of interracial mixing amongst South African university students. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(4), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390721
18.
FiskeS.CuddyA.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
19.
GalvanM. J.PayneB. K.HannayJ.GeorgesonA. R.MuscatellK. A. (2023). What does the MacArthur scale of subjective social status measure? Separating economic circumstances and social status to predict health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 57(11), 929–941.
20.
GilbertP. (2000). The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: The role of the evaluation of social rank. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 7(3), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0879(200007)7:3<174::AID-CPP236>3.0.CO;2-U
21.
GómezA.TroppL. R.FernándezS. (2011). When extended contact opens the door to future contact: Testing the effects of extended contact on attitudes and intergroup expectancies in majority and minority groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210391119
22.
HaoY.EvansG. W.FarahM. J. (2023). Pessimistic cognitive biases mediate socioeconomic status and children’s mental health problems. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5191. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32482-y
23.
HarveyS. P.BourhisR. Y. (2013). Discrimination between the rich and the poor under contrasting conditions of wealth stratification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E351–E366.
24.
HaywardL. E.TroppL. R.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: Descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216685291
25.
JiL. J.LeeA.ZhangZ.LiY.WangX. Q.TorokD.RosenbaumS. (2023). Judging a book by its cover: Cultural differences in inference of the inner state based on the outward appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000413
26.
KrausM. W.HorbergE. J.GoetzJ. L.KeltnerD. (2011). Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1376–1388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211410987
27.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756
28.
KrausM. W.TorrezB. (2020). A psychology of power that is embedded in societal structures. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.018
29.
KroschA. R.AmodioD. M. (2019). Scarcity disrupts the neural encoding of Black faces: A socioperceptual pathway to discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(5), 859–875. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000168
30.
Leos-UrbelJ.SchwartzA. E.WeinsteinM.CorcoranS. (2013). Not just for poor kids: The impact of universal free school breakfast on meal participation and student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 36, 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.06.007
31.
LiebeU.SchwitterN.TutićA. (2022). Individuals of high socioeconomic status are altruistic in sharing money but egoistic in sharing time. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 10831.
LuX. (2002). Research report on social stratum in contemporary China. Social Sciences Academic Press.
34.
MahadevanN.GreggA. P.SedikidesC. (2021). Self-esteem as a hierometer: Sociometric status is a more potent and proximate predictor of self-esteem than socioeconomic status. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 150(12), 2613–2635. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001056
35.
MansteadA. S. R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
36.
Navarro-CarrilloG.Valor-SeguraI.MoyaM. (2018). Do you trust strangers, close acquaintances, and members of your ingroup? Differences in trust based on social class in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 135(2), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1527-7
37.
NgW.DienerE. (2014). What matters to the rich and the poor? Subjective well-being, financial satisfaction, and postmaterialist needs across the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(2), 326–338.
38.
ParkJ.KitayamaS.MiyamotoY. (2024). When high subjective social status becomes a burden: A Japan-U.S. comparison of biological health markers. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(7), 1098–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231162747
39.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
40.
PhelanJ. C.LinkB. G.TehranifarP. (2010). Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 51(1), S28–S40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383498
41.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 790–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006011
42.
PriceJ.SlomanL.GardnerR.GilbertP.RohdeP. (1994). The social competition hypothesis of depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164(3), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.164.3.309
43.
QiY.LiuZ.CaoS.HanY.WangQ.LiuX.WuH. (2023). Social value orientation modulates behavioral and neural responses to social influence. Human Brain Mapping, 44(8), 3222–3231. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26276
44.
RaedtR. D.RemueJ.LoeysT.HooleyJ. M.BaekenC. (2017). The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex on implicit self-esteem is mediated by rumination after criticism. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 99, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.10.009
45.
ReimerN. K.BeckerJ. C.BenzA.ChristO.DhontK.KlockeU.NejiS.RychlowskaM.SchmidK.HewstoneM. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478
46.
SchäferS. J.SimsekM.JaspersE.KrosM.HewstoneM.SchmidK.FellB. F.DorroughA. R.GlöcknerA.ChristO. (2022). Dynamic contact effects: Individuals’ positive and negative contact history influences intergroup contact effects in a behavioral game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000374
47.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
48.
SchulreichS.TuscheA.KanskeP.SchwabeL. (2023). Higher subjective socioeconomic status is linked to increased charitable giving and mentalizing-related neural value coding. NeuroImage, 279, 120315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120315
49.
ShankarA.McMunnA.DemakakosP.HamerM.SteptoeA. (2017). Social isolation and loneliness: Prospective associations with functional status in older adults. Health Psychology, 36(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea000043
50.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.91
51.
StephanW. G.BonieckiK. A.YbarraO.BettencourtA.ErvinK. S.JacksonL. A.McNattP. S.RenfroC. L. (2008). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of blacks and whites. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812009
52.
StephensN. M.MarkusH. R.FrybergS. A. (2012). Social class disparities in health and education: Reducing inequality by applying a sociocultural self model of behavior. Psychological Review, 119(4), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029028
53.
StephensN. M.MarkusH. R.PhillipsL. T. (2014). Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143
54.
StephensN. M.TownsendS. S. (2013). Rank is not enough: Why we need a sociocultural perspective to understand social class. Psychological Inquiry, 24(2), 126–130.
55.
StuppyA.MeadN. L.OsselaerS. M. J. V. (2019). I am, therefore I buy: Low self-esteem and the pursuit of self-verifying consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(5), 956–973. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz029
56.
TanJ. J.KrausM. W.CarpenterN. C.AdlerN. E. (2020). The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(11), 970.
57.
TippettN.WolkeD. (2014). Socioeconomic status and bullying: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), e48–e59. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301960
58.
TroppL. R. (2003). The psychological impact of prejudice: Implications for intergroup contact. Group Process & Intergroup Relations, 6(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006002001
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
62.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
63.
ZengZ.XieY. (2008). A preference-opportunity-choice framework with applications to intergroup friendship. American Journal of Sociology, 114(3), 615–648.
64.
ZhouS.Page-GouldE.AronA.MoyerA.HewstoneM. (2018). The extended contact hypothesis: A meta-analysis on 20 years of research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318762647
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
