Despite extensive research, the relationship between income inequality and life satisfaction remains unclear, with some countries experiencing negative consequences, while others show neutral or positive outcomes. Using data from the Gallup World Poll (2006–2022) with nearly two million respondents from more than 110 countries, we disentangle the distinct within-country and between-country effects of inequality. Our multilevel analyses reveal a significant within-country effect: Temporal increases in inequality are associated with decreases in life satisfaction. At the between-country level, power distance—a cultural dimension reflecting tolerance for social disparities—moderates the relationship. In low power distance countries, higher inequality strongly predicts lower life satisfaction, whereas in high power distance countries, the effect is nonsignificant. These findings are robust across two measures of income inequality and controls for wealth and individualism, offering a refined methodological and cultural interpretation to resolve inconsistencies in prior cross-national research.
AkaliyskiP.WelzelC.BondM. H.MinkovM. (2021). On “nationology”: The gravitational field of national culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(8–9), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/94msk
2.
AlesinaA.Di TellaR.MacCullochR. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different?Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.293781
BasabeN.PaezD.ValenciaJ.GonzalezJ. L.RiméB.DienerE. (2002). Cultural dimensions, socioeconomic development, climate, and emotional hedonic level. Cognition & Emotion, 16(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000158
5.
BasabeN.RosM. (2005). Cultural dimensions and social behavior correlates: Individualism-collectivism and power distance [Dimensions culturelles et facteur sociaux associés: Individualisme, collectivisme et distance au pouvoir]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 18(1–2), 189–224.
BellA.JonesK. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7
8.
BergM.VeenhovenR. (2010). Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations: In search for an optimum that does not appear to exist. In GreveB. (Ed.), Happiness and social policy in Europe (pp. 174–194). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781000731.00017
9.
BrandoliniA.SmeedingT. M. (2008). Inequality patterns in western democracies: Cross-country differences and changes over time. In BeramendiP.AndersonC. J. (Eds.), Democracy, inequality, and representation (pp. 25–61). Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
CantrilH. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. Rutgers University Press.
11.
FairbrotherM. (2014). Two multilevel modeling techniques for analyzing comparative longitudinal survey datasets. Political Science Research and Methods, 2(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2013.24
12.
GalbraithJ. K. (2011). Inequality and economic and political change: A comparative perspective. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 4(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsq014
13.
Gallup World Poll. (2009). World Poll methodology. Gallup Inc.
14.
GáspárA.CervoneC.DuranteF.MaassA.SuitnerC.ValtortaR. R.VezzoliM. (2023). A twofold subjective measure of income inequality. Social Indicators Research, 168(1–3), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03121-w
15.
GrahamC.FeltonA. (2006). Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 4(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-9009-1
16.
HallerM.HadlerM. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 169–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-6297-y
17.
HeisigJ. P.SchaefferM. (2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review, 35(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy053
18.
HelliwellJ. F.HuangH. (2008). How’s your government? International Evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123408000306
KaasaA. (2021). Merging Hofstede, Schwartz, and Inglehart into a single system. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221211011244
26.
KavarnouD.SzumiloN. (2018). Rich become richer and poor become poorer: A wealth inequality approach from Great Britain. In ArestisP.SawyerM. (Eds.), Inequality. International papers in political economy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91298-1_7
27.
KelleyJ.EvansM. D. R. (2017). Societal inequality and individual subjective well-being: Results from 68 societies and over 200,000 individuals, 1981–2008. Social Science Research, 62, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.020
28.
KusanoK.KemmelmeierM. (2020). Multi-level modelling of time-series cross-sectional data reveals the dynamic interaction between ecological threats and democratic development. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191804. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191804
29.
LayteR. (2012). The association between income inequality and mental health: Testing status anxiety, social capital, and neo-materialist explanations. European Sociological Review, 28(4), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr012
30.
LiC.ZuckermanM.DienerE. (2019). Culture moderates the relation between income inequality and subjective well-being. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(10), 1221–1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119883019
31.
MinkovM.KaasaA. (2022). Do dimensions of culture exist objectively? A validation of the revised Minkov-Hofstede model of culture with World Values Survey items and scores for 102 countries. Journal of International Management, 28(4), 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2022.100971
32.
MinkovM.VignolesV. L.WelzelC.AkaliyskiP.BondM. H.KaasaA.SmithP. B. (2024). Comparative culturology and cross-cultural psychology: How comparing societal cultures differs from comparing individuals’ minds across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 55(2), 164–188.
33.
NgamabaK. H.PanagiotiM.ArmitageC. J. (2018). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Quality of Life Research, 27(3), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-0171719-x
34.
OishiS.BakH.CaluoriN. (2022). Cultural psychology of inequality: Current and future directions. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12516
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. STATA press.
37.
RözerJ.KraaykampG. (2013). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A cross-national study on the conditional effects of individual and national characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0124-7
38.
SagieA.AycanZ. (2003). A cross-cultural analysis of participative decision-making in organizations. Human Relations, 56(4), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056004003
SchneiderS. M. (2016). Income inequality and subjective wellbeing: Trends, challenges, and research directions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1719–1739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9655-3
41.
SchröderM. (2016). How income inequality influences life satisfaction: Hybrid effects evidence from the German SOEP. European Sociological Review, 32(2), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv136
42.
SchröderM. (2018). Income inequality and life satisfaction: Unrelated between countries, associated within countries over time. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(4), 1021–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-0179860-3
SchwarzeJ.HärpferM. (2007). Are people inequality averse, and do they prefer redistribution by the state? Evidence from German longitudinal data on life satisfaction. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.047
45.
SoltF. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/mwnje
VezzoliM.ValtortaR. R.MariS.DuranteF.VolpatoC. (2023). Effects of objective and subjective indicators of economic inequality on subjective well-being: Underlying mechanisms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12928
49.
WelzelC.InglehartR.KligemannH. D. (2003). The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 341–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00086
50.
WilkinsonR.PicketK. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin.
51.
ZyphurM. J.AllisonP. D.TayL.VoelkleM. C.PreacherK. J.ZhangZ.HamakerE. L.ShamsollahiA.PieridesD. C.KovalP.DienerE. (2020). From data to causes I: Building a general cross-lagged panel model (GCLM). Organizational Research Methods, 23(4), 651–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119847278
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
