This study investigated the relationships between subjective health, hedonic wellbeing (i.e. positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction), and eudaimonic wellbeing (i.e. psycho-social functioning). The sample was drawn from the Gallup World Poll and included a total of 1,567,295 individuals in 165 countries. We found that both hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing were uniquely associated with subjective health. However, the relative contributions of each dimension to subjective health varied, with negative affect demonstrating the strongest relationship with subjective health and life satisfaction demonstrating the weakest association. The moderating effects of some national-level variables were also explored.
AspinwallLGTedeschiRG (2010) The value of positive psychology for health psychology: Progress and pitfalls in examining the relation of positive phenomena to health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine39(1): 4–15.
2.
BombakAE (2013) Self-rated health and public health: A critical perspective. Frontiers in Public Health1: 15.
3.
BowlingA (2005) Just one question: If one question works, why ask several?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health59: 342–345.
4.
CalvoRZhengYKumarS, et al. (2012) Well-being and social capital on planet Earth: Cross-national evidence from 142 countries. PLoS ONE7(8): e42793.
5.
ClarkAE (2018) Four decades of the economics of happiness: Where next?Review of Income and Wealth64(2): 245–269.
6.
CohenS (2004) Social relationships and health. American Psychologist59(8): 676–684.
7.
CrossMPHofschneiderLGrimmM, et al. (2018) Subjective well-being and physical health. In: DienerEOishiSTayL (eds) Handbook of well-Being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. Available at: https://www.nobascholar.com/chapters/64/download.pdf
8.
CurhanKBSimsTMarkusHR, et al. (2014) Just how bad negative affect is for your health depends on culture. Psychological Science25(12): 2277–2280.
9.
CzekierdaKBanikAParkC, et al. (2017) Meaning in life and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review11(4): 387–418.
10.
DienerEChanMY (2011) Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being3(1): 1–43.
11.
DienerETayL (2015) Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology50(2): 135–149.
12.
DienerEEmmonsRALarsenRJ, et al. (1985) The satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment49(1): 71–75.
13.
DienerELucasROishiS (2002) Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In: SnyderCRLopezSJ (eds) The Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–73.
14.
DienerEPressmanSHunterJ, et al. (2017) If, why, and when subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being9(2): 133–167.
15.
ErikssonIUndénALElofssonS (2001) Self-rated health. Comparisons between three different measures. Results from a population study. International Journal of Epidemiology30(2): 326–333.
16.
FranksPGoldMRFiscellaK (2003) Sociodemographics, self-rated health, and mortality in the US. Social Science & Medicine56(12): 2505–2514.
17.
GalinhaICPais-RibeiroJL (2011) Cognitive, affective and contextual predictors of subjective wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing2: 34–53.
18.
GeerlingDMDienerE (2020) Effect size strengths in subjective well-being research. Applied Research in Quality of Life15(1): 167–185.
19.
GriswoldMGFullmanNHawleyC, et al. (2018) Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet392(10152): 1015–1035.
20.
HeckRHThomasSTabataL (2013) Multilevel Modeling of Categorical Outcomes Using IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge.
21.
HeintzelmanSJ (2018) Eudaimonia in the contemporary science of subjective well-being: Psychological well-being, self-determination, and meaning in life. In: DienerEOishiSTayL (eds) Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. Available at: https://www.nobascholar.com/chapters/18/download.pdf
22.
HoebelJLampertT (2020) Subjective social status and health: Multidisciplinary explanations and methodological challenges. Journal of Health Psychology25(2): 173–185.
23.
HowellRTKernMLLyubomirskyS (2007) Health benefits: Meta-analytically determining the impact of wellbeing on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review1: 83–136.
24.
HoxJ (2010) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New York: Routledge.
25.
JoshanlooM (2018) Optimal human functioning around the world: A new index ofeudaimonic well-being in 166 nations. British Journal of Psychology109(4): 637–655.
26.
JoshanlooM (2019) Cultural religiosity as the moderator of the relationship between affective experience and life satisfaction: A study in 147 countries. Emotion19(4): 629.
27.
JoshanlooM (2019) Structural and discriminant validity of the tripartite model of mental well-being: Differential relationships with the big five traits. Journal of Mental Health28(2): 168–174.
28.
JylhäM (2009) What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Social Science & Medicine69: 307–316.
29.
KitayamaSParkJ (2017) Emotion and biological health: The socio-cultural moderation. Current Opinion in Psychology17: 99–105.
30.
Kööts-AusmeesLRealoA (2015) The association between life satisfaction and self-reported health status in Europe. European Journal of Personality29: 647–657.
31.
KumarSCalvoRAvendanoM, et al. (2012) Social support, volunteering and health around the world: Cross-national evidence from 139 countries. Social Science & Medicine74: 696–706.
32.
MiyamotoYMorozink BoylonJCoeCL, et al. (2013) Negative emotions predict elevated interleukin-6 in the United States but not in Japan. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity34: 79–85.
33.
MorgenCSSørensenTI (2014) Obesity: Global trends in the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Nature Reviews Endocrinology10(9): 513–514.
34.
NezlekJB (2010) Multilevel modeling and cross-cultural research. In: MatsumotoDVan de VijverAJR (eds) Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 299–347.
35.
NgamabaKHPanagiotiMArmitageCJ (2017) How strongly related are health status and subjective well-being? Systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health27: 879–885.
36.
PickettKEWilkinsonRG (2015) Income inequality and health: A causal review. Social Science & Medicine128: 316–326.
37.
PressmanSDGallagherMWLopezSJ (2013) Is the emotion-health connection a “first-world problem”?Psychological Science24: 544–549.
38.
RoepkeAMJayawickremeERiffleOM (2014) Meaning and health: A systematic review. Applied Research in Quality of Life9: 1055–1079.
39.
RyanRDeciE (2001) On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology52: 141–166.
40.
RyffCD (2017) Eudaimonic well-being, inequality, and health: Recent findings and future directions. International Review of Economics64: 159–178.
41.
RyffCDBoylanJM (2016) Linking happiness to health: Comparisons between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In: BruniLPortaPL (eds) Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Happiness and Quality of Life. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 53–70.
42.
RyffCDRadlerBTFriedmanEM (2015) Persistent psychological well-being predicts improved self-rated health over 9–10 years: Longitudinal evidence from MIDUS. Health Psychology Open. Epub ahead of print 25 August. DOI: 10.1177/2055102915601582.
43.
SegerstromSC (2014) Affect and self-rated health: A dynamic approach with older adults. Health Psychology33: 720–728.
44.
SpulingSMHuxholdOWurmS (2017) Predictors of self-rated health: Does education play a role above and beyond Age?The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences72: 415–424.
45.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (2015) Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
46.
WardMM (2013) Sense of control and self-reported health in a population-based sample of older Americans: Assessment of potential confounding by affect, personality, and social support. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine20: 140–147.
47.
WatermanAS (2008) Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology3: 234–252.
48.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54: 1063–1070.
49.
WeinsteinNLegateNAl-KhoujaM, et al. (2018) Relations of civil liberties and women’s health satisfaction around the globe: The explanatory power of autonomy. Journal of Health Psychology. Epub ahead of print 14 November. DOI: 10.1177/1359105318810074.
50.
WestBTWelchKBGaleckiAT (2015) Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
51.
WuSWangRZhaoY, et al. (2013) The relationship between self-rated health and objective health status: A population-based study. BMC Public Health13(1): 320.
52.
YooJMiyamotoY (2018) Cultural fit of emotions and health implications: A psychosocial resources model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass12(2): e12372.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
