Devaluation of Attractive Alternatives: How Those With Poor Inhibitory Ability Preemptively Resist Temptation

Abstract

How do people resist in-the-moment temptation if they are poor at inhibiting their impulses? Theory on self-control suggests that people have a toolbox of strategies available to them that may be used preemptively to dampen temptations. Applying this to the goal of relationship maintenance, in two studies, we examined whether people motivated to maintain their romantic relationship but poor at inhibitory control would appraise an attractive alternative (AA) as less appealing prior to a face-to-face interaction. In Study 1 (N = 190), those with high motivation and low inhibitory control (measured with the Stroop) rated the AA as less appealing as compared with singles and those high in motivation and inhibitory control. We replicated the motivation by inhibitory control interaction in Study 2 (N = 219). The AAs paradigm and the Devaluation Effect provide a useful way to explore the toolbox approach to self-control strategies.

Keywords

motivation self-control temptation romantic relationships devaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amato

P. R.

Previti

(2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24(5), 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03024005002

Auger

Hurley

Lydon

J. E.

(2016). Compensatory relationship enhancement: An identity motivated response to relationship threat. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616461

Baranger

D. A. A.

Finsaas

M. C.

Goldstein

B. L.

Vize

C. E.

Lynam

D. R.

Olino

T. M.

(2022). Tutorial: Power analyses for interaction effects in cross-sectional regressions. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5ptd7

Baumeister

R. F.

(1998). The self. In Gilbert

D. T.

Fiske

S. T.

Lindsey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 68–740). McGraw-Hill.

Birnbaum

G. E.

Bachar

Levy

G. F.

Zholtack

Reis

H. T.

(2022). Put me in your shoes: Does perspective-taking inoculate against the appeal of alternative partners? The Journal of Sex Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2150998

Birnbaum

G. E.

Chen

Y. R.

Zholtack

Giron

Friedman

(2023). Biting the forbidden fruit: The effect of flirting with a virtual agent on attraction to real alternative and existing partners. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 4, Article 100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100084

Brady

Baker

L. R.

(2022). The changing tides of attractive alternatives in romantic relationships: Recent societal changes compel new directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(1), Article e12650. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12650

Brady

Baker

L. R.

Miller

R. S.

(2020). Look but don’t touch? Self-regulation determines whether noticing attractive alternatives increases infidelity. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000578

Cross

S. E.

Bacon

P. L.

Morris

M. L.

(2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791

10.

Duckworth

A. L.

Kern

M. L.

(2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 259–268.

11.

Duckworth

A. L.

Gendler

T. S.

Gross

J. J.

(2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247

12.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A.-G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

13.

Faure

McNulty

J. K.

Hicks

L. L.

Righetti

(2020). The case of studying implicit social cognition in close relationships. Social Cognition, 38(Suppl.), s98–s114. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s98

14.

Findley

M. B.

Carvallo

Bartak

C. P.

(2014). The effect of self-control on willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Self and Identity, 13(3), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2013.826595

15.

Fishbach

Hofmann

(2015). Nudging self-control: A smartphone intervention of temptation anticipation and goal resolution improves everyday goal progress. Motivation Science, 1(3), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000022

16.

Fishbach

Shah

J. Y.

(2006). Self-control in action: Implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 820–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.820

17.

Fraley

R. C.

Vazire

(2014). The N-pact factor: Evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power. PLOS ONE, 9(10), Article e109019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109019

18.

Frank

Brandstätter

(2002). Approach versus avoidance: Different types of commitment in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.208

19.

Fujita

(2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411165

20.

Fujita

Orvell

Kross

(2020). Smarter, not harder: A Toolbox approach to enhancing self-control. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220941242

21.

Gagné

Khan

Lydon

(2008). When flattery gets you nowhere: Discounting positive feedback as a relationship maintenance strategy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 40(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.40.2.59

22.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493

23.

Hagger

M. S.

Wood

Stiff

Chatzisarantis

N. L. D.

(2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486

24.

Hofmann

Adriaanse

Vohs

K. D.

Baumeister

R. F.

(2014). Dieting and the self-control of eating in everyday environments: An experience sampling study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19(3), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12053

25.

Hofmann

Baumeister

R. F.

Förster

Vohs

K. D.

(2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026545

26.

Holt-Lunstad

Smith

T. B.

Layton

J. B.

(2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS Medicine, 7(7), Article e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316

27.

Houben

Wiers

R. W.

(2009). Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(4), 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00877.x

28.

Johnson

D. J.

Rusbult

C. E.

(1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 967–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967

29.

Kane

M. J.

Engle

R. W.

(2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47

30.

Karremans

J. C.

Dotsch

Corneille

(2011). Romantic relationship status biases memory of faces of attractive opposite-sex others: Evidence from a reverse correlation paradigm. Cognition, 121(3), 422–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.07.008

31.

Karremans

J. C.

Pronk

T. M.

van der Wal

R. C.

(2015). Executive control and relationship maintenance processes: An empirical overview and theoretical integration. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(7), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12177

32.

Karremans

J. C.

Verwijmeren

(2008). Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: The role of romantic relationship status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 939–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316693

33.

Klein

R. J.

Liu

Diehl

Robinson

M. D.

(2017). The personality-related implications of Stroop performance: Stress-contingent self-control in daily life. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.07.006

34.

Krueger

K. L.

Forest

A. L.

(2020). Communicating commitment: A relationship-protection account of dyadic displays on social media. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219893998

35.

Linardatos

Lydon

J. E.

(2011). Relationship-specific identification and spontaneous relationship maintenance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023647

36.

Lund

(1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407585021001

37.

Lydon

J. E.

Karremans

J. C.

(2015). Relationship regulation in the face of eye candy: A motivated cognition framework for understanding responses to attractive alternatives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.011

38.

Lydon

J. E.

Meana

Sepinwall

Richards

Mayman

(1999). The commitment calibration hypothesis: When do people devalue attractive alternatives? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002002

39.

MacDonald

Park

Hayes

Vanasse Grosdidier

Park

S. W.

(2021). Quality of alternatives positively associated with interest in opening up a relationship. Personal Relationships, 28(3), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12377

40.

MacLeod

C. M.

(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163

41.

MacLeod

C. M.

(2005). The Stroop task in cognitive research. In Wenzel

Rubin

D. C.

(Eds.), Cognitive methods and their application to clinical research (pp. 17–40). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10870-002

42.

Maner

J. K.

Rouby

D. A.

Gonzaga

G. C.

(2008). Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: The evolved psychology of relationship maintenance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.04.003

43.

Metcalfe

Mischel

(1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.

44.

McNulty

J. K.

Meltzer

A. L.

Makhanova

Maner

J. K.

(2018). Attentional and evaluative biases help people maintain relationships by avoiding infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000127

45.

Miller

R. S.

(1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 758–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.758

46.

Milyavskaya

Inzlicht

Hope

Koestner

(2015). Saying “no” to temptation: Want-to motivation improves self-regulation by reducing temptation rather than by increasing self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000045

47.

Milyavskaya

Saunders

Inzlicht

(2021). Self-control in daily life: Prevalence and effectiveness of diverse self-control strategies. Journal of Personality, 89(4), 634–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12604

48.

Miyake

Friedman

N. P.

(2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458

49.

Miyake

Friedman

N. P.

Emerson

M. J.

Witzki

A. H.

Howerter

Wager

T. D.

(2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734

50.

Pronk

T. M.

Karremans

J. C.

Overbeek

Vermulst

A. A.

Wigboldus

D. H. J.

(2010). What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017875

51.

Pronk

T. M.

Karremans

J. C.

Wigboldus

D. H. J.

(2011). How can you resist? Executive control helps romantically involved individuals to stay faithful. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 827–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021993

52.

R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/

53.

Richard

F. D.

Bond

C. F.

Jr. Stokes-Zoota

J. J.

(2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331

54.

Richeson

J. A.

Trawalter

(2005). Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 934–947. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.934

55.

Righetti

Đurić

Hofmann

Finkenauer

(2022). Self-regulation in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 29(4), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12449

56.

Ritter

S. M.

Karremans

J. C.

van Schie

H. T.

(2010). The role of self-regulation in derogating attractive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.010

57.

Robinson

M. D.

Schmeichel

B. J.

Inzlicht

(2010). A cognitive control perspective of self-control strength and its depletion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(3), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00244.x

58.

Saunders

Milyavskaya

Etz

Randles

Inzlicht

(2018). Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function: A bayesian analysis. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.134

59.

Shah

J. Y.

Friedman

Kruglanski

A. W.

(2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1261–1280. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1261

60.

Sheldon

K. M.

Elliot

A. J.

(1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.482

61.

Simpson

J. A.

Gangestad

S. W.

Lerma

(1990). Perception of physical attractiveness: Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1192–1201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1192

62.

Stroop

J. R.

(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651

63.

Vazire

(2014, October). Open letter to editors. Sometimes I’m wrong. https://sometimesimwrong.typepad.com/wrong/2014/10/open-letter-to-editors.html

64.

Visserman

M. L.

Karremans

J. C.

(2014). Romantic relationship status biases the processing of an attractive alternative’s behavior. Personal Relationships, 21(2), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12035

65.

Wieselquist

Rusbult

C. E.

Foster

C. A.

Agnew

C. R.

(1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 942–966. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.942

66.

Williamson

L. Z.

Wilkowski

B. M.

(2020). Nipping temptation in the bud: Examining strategic self-control in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219883606

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB