Does Conceptual Abstraction Moderate Whether Past Moral Deeds Motivate Consistency or Compensatory Behavior? A Registered Replication and Extension of Conway and Peetz (2012)

Abstract

A long-standing debate in psychology concerns whether doing something good or bad leads to more of the same or the opposite. Conway and Peetz proposed that conceptual abstraction moderates if past moral deeds lead to consistent or compensatory behavior. Although cited 384 times across disciplines, we did not find any direct replications. It was also unclear how increases or decreases from one’s baseline prosociality might underlie the effect. A large-scale experiment (N = 5,091) in the registered report format tested Conway and Peetz’s original hypothesis. The hypothesized interaction was not replicated: conceptual abstraction did not moderate the effect of recalling moral vs. immoral behavior on prosocial intentions. Our results show that recalling moral behavior led to higher prosocial intentions than recalling either immoral or neutral behavior, irrespective of recalling from the recent or distant past. Thus, the current research found no evidence for compensatory moral behavior, only for positive moral consistency.

Keywords

conceptual abstraction moral consistency moral licensing moral cleansing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arkes

H. R.

Blumer

(1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4

Berger

Sherman

Ungar

(2020). TextAnalyzer [Computer software]. http://textanalyzer.org

Blanken

van de Ven

Zeelenberg

(2015). A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215572134

Blanken

van de Ven

Zeelenberg

Meijers

M. H. C.

(2014). Three attempts to replicate the moral licensing effect. Social Psychology, 45, 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000189

Blasi

(1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.1

Brown

R. P.

Tamborski

Wang

Barnes

C. D.

Mumford

M. D.

Connelly

Devenport

L. D.

(2011). Moral credentialing and the rationalization of misconduct. Ethics & Behavior, 21, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2011.537566

Buhrmester

M. D.

Talaifar

Gosling

S. D.

(2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706516

Chambers

C. D.

Tzavella

(2021). The past, present and future of Registered Reports. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7

Conway

Peetz

(2012). When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212442394

10.

Cornelissen

Bashshur

M. R.

Rode

Le Menestrel

(2013). Rules or consequences? The role of ethical mind-sets in moral dynamics. Psychological Science, 24, 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457376

11.

DeVoe

S. E.

Pfeffer

(2007). When time is money: The effect of hourly payment on the evaluation of time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.003

12.

Ebersole

C. R.

Atherton

O. E.

Belanger

A. L.

Skulborstad

H. M.

Allen

J. M.

Banks

J. B.

Baranski

Bernstein

M. J.

Bonfiglio

D. B. V.

Boucher

Brown

E. R.

Budiman

N. I.

Cairo

A. H.

Capaldi

C. A.

Chartier

C. R.

Chung

J. M.

Cicero

D. C.

Coleman

J. A.

Conway

J. G.

. . . Nosek

B. A.

(2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012

13.

Effron

D. A.

Cameron

J. S.

Monin

(2009). Endorsing Obama licenses favoring Whites. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 590–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.001

14.

Effron

D. A.

Conway

(2015). When virtue leads to villainy: Advances in research on moral self-licensing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.017

15.

Eskine

K. J.

(2013). Wholesome foods and wholesome morals?: Organic foods reduce prosocial behavior and harshen moral judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612447114

16.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

17.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

18.

Freedman

J. L.

Fraser

S. C.

(1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552

19.

Gholamzadehmir

Sparks

Farsides

(2019). Moral licensing, moral cleansing and pro-environmental behaviour: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, Article 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101334

20.

Goodman

J. K.

Paolacci

(2017). Crowdsourcing consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx047

21.

Griep

Germeys

Kraak

J. M.

(2021). Unpacking the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior: Moral licensing and temporal focus. Group & Organization Management, 46, 819–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121995366

22.

Heider

(1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275

23.

The jamovi project. (2022). Jamovi (2.3) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org

24.

Jordan

Mullen

Murnighan

J. K.

(2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211400208

25.

Juhl

H. J.

Fenger

M. H. J.

Thøgersen

(2017). Will the consistent organic food consumer step forward? An empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx052

26.

Karmarkar

U. R.

Bollinger

(2015). BYOB: How bringing your own shopping bags leads to treating yourself and the environment. Journal of Marketing, 79, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0228

27.

Kuper

Bott

(2019). Has the evidence for moral licensing been inflated by publication bias? Meta-Psychology, 3, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.878

28.

Lakens

(2017). Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for t Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177

29.

Lakens

Scheel

A. M.

Isager

P. M.

(2018). Equivalence Testing for Psychological Research: A Tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259 –269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963

30.

Lalot

Falomir-Pichastor

J. M.

Quiamzade

(2022). Regulatory focus and self-licensing dynamics: A motivational account of behavioural consistency and balancing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, Article 101731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101731

31.

List

J. A.

Momeni

(2021). When corporate social responsibility backfires: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Management Science, 67, 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3540

32.

Maier

Bartoš

Wagenmakers

E.-J.

Shanks

Harris

A. J. L.

(2022). Adjusting for publication bias reveals that evidence for and size of construal level theory effects is substantially overestimated [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/r8nyu

33.

Mazar

Zhong

C.-B.

(2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21, 494–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363538

34.

Merritt

A. C.

Effron

D. A.

Fein

Savitsky

K. K.

Tuller

D. M.

Monin

(2012). The strategic pursuit of moral credentials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 774 –777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.017

35.

Moery

Calin-Jageman

R. J.

(2016). Direct and conceptual replications of Eskine (2013): Organic food exposure has little to no effect on moral judgments and prosocial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616639649

36.

Monin

Miller

D. T.

(2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33

37.

Mullen

Monin

(2016). Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120

38.

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, Article aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

39.

Palan

Schitter

(2018). Prolific.Ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004

40.

Peer

Brandimarte

Samat

Acquisti

(2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006

41.

Peer

Rothschild

Gordon

Evernden

Damer

(2022). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 1643–1662. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3

42.

Qualtrics. (2022). Qualtrics Version 2022 [Computer software]. https://www.qualtrics.com

43.

R Core Team. (2013). R [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/

44.

Reed

Aquino

Levy

(2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71, 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.178

45.

Reed

Kay

Finnel

Aquino

Levy

(2016). I don’t want the money, I just want your time: How moral identity overcomes the aversion to giving time to prosocial causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000058

46.

Rosen

C. C.

Koopman

Gabriel

A. S.

Johnson

R. E.

(2016). Who strikes back? A daily investigation of when and why incivility begets incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1620–1634. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000140

47.

Rotella

Barclay

(2020). Failure to replicate moral licensing and moral cleansing in an online experiment. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, Article 109967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109967

48.

Rotella

Jung

Chinn

Barclay

(2023). Observation moderates the moral licensing effect: A meta-analytic test of interpersonal and intrapsychic mechanisms [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tmhe9

49.

Sachdeva

Iliev

Medin

D. L.

(2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-Regulation. Psychological Science, 20, 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x

50.

Simbrunner

Schlegelmilch

B. B.

(2017). Moral licensing: A culture-moderated meta-analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 67, 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0128-0

51.

Susewind

Hoelzl

(2014). A matter of perspective: Why past moral behavior can sometimes encourage and other times discourage future moral striving. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12214

52.

Susewind

Walkowitz

(2020). Symbolic moral self—completion—Social recognition of prosocial behavior reduces subsequent moral striving. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 560188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560188

53.

Tiefenbeck

Staake

Roth

Sachs

(2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021

54.

Trope

Liberman

(2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403

55.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963

56.

Urban

Bahník

Š.

Kohlová

M. B.

(2019). Green consumption does not make people cheat: Three attempts to replicate moral licensing effect due to pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.011

57.

van der Werff

Steg

Keizer

. (2014). Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.004

58.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

Tellegen

(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

59.

Zhong

C.-B.

Liljenquist

(2006). Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451 -1452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726

60.

Zhou

Fishbach

(2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000056

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.52 MB

18.72 MB