Proximal socio-economic drivers of gender equality tend to obscure its remote ecological origins. General systems theory predicts that the greater annual variability in daylength, temperature, and daily precipitation at higher latitudes requires greater psychosocial flexibility. We extend this prediction to gender equality as a likely consequence. Accordingly, for 87 pre-industrial societies after 1500 CE, we find more gender equality in more variable habitats, and that this link is mediated by greater subsistence flexibility—foraging rather than raising plants and animals. Mutatis mutandis, these ecological predictors of global gender equality replicate in 175 modern countries after 2000 CE. Gender equality was, and still is, lowest around the Equator, higher toward the North and South Poles, and invariant in east–west direction. The geographical positioning of gender equality in pre-industrial times can predict over 40% of the opposite north–south gradients of gender equality in the opposite Northern and Southern Hemispheres today.
AhmedS. (2020). Concurrent media news use and gender-based political participation inequality in a low-income democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 32, 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa001
2.
AlesinaA.GiulianoP.NunnN. (2013). On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128, 469–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt005
3.
AminA.Abreu LopesC.GeorgeA. (2020). Structural determinants of gender inequality: Why they matter for adolescent girls’ sexual and reproductive health. BMJ, 368, 16985. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.16985
4.
AschoffJ. (1981). Annual rhythms in man. In AschoffJ. (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology: Vol. 4. Biological rhythms (pp. 475–487). Plenum Press.
5.
AshbyW. R. (1958). Requisite variety and implications for control of complex systems. Cybernetica, 1, 83–99.
6.
BoserupE. (1970). Woman’s role in economic development. Allen & Unwin.
7.
BromhamL.HuaX.CardilloM.SchneemannH.GreenhillS. J. (2018). Parasites and politics: Why cross-cultural studies must control for relatedness, proximity and covariation. Royal Society Open Science, 5, 181100. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181100
8.
BurroughsW. J. (1997). Does the weather really matter? The social implication of climate change. Cambridge University Press.
9.
CanoT.HofmeisterH. (2023). The intergenerational transmission of gender: Paternal influences on children’s gender attitudes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 85, 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12863
10.
CashdanE.SteeleM. (2013). Pathogen prevalence, group bias, and collectivism in the standard cross-cultural sample. Human Nature, 24, 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9159-3
11.
ChaabanJ.CunninghamW. (2011). Measuring the economic gain of investing in girls: The girl effect dividend. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5753
12.
CockburnA. (2006). Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1375–1383. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3458
DitlevsenP. D.SvensmarkH.JohnsenS. (1996). Contrasting atmospheric and climate dynamics of the last-glacial and Holocene periods. Nature, 379, 810–812. https://doi.org/10.1038/379810a0
16.
DivaleW.SedaA. (2000). Cross-cultural codes of modernization. World Cultures, 11, 152–170.
17.
DivaleW.SedaA. (2001). Modernization as changes in cultural complexity: New cross-cultural measurements. Cross-Cultural Research, 35, 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710103500203
18.
DybleM.SalaliG. D.ChaudharyN.PageA.SmithD.ThompsonJ.ViniciusL.MaceR.MiglianoA. B. (2015). Sex equality can explain the unique social structure of hunter-gatherer bands. Science, 348(6236), 796–798. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5139
19.
EnglandP.LevineA.MishelE. (2020). Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 117, 6990–6997. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918891117
20.
FalkA.HermleJ. (2018). Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality. Science, 362, Article eaas9899. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9899
21.
FincherC. L.ThornhillR. (2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000021
GiulianoP.NunnN. (2021). Understanding cultural persistence and change. The Review of Economic Studies, 88, 1541–1581. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa074
24.
HansenC. W.JensenP. S.SkovsgaardC. V. (2015). Modern gender roles and agricultural history: The Neolithic inheritance. Journal of Economic Growth, 20, 365–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9119-y
25.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
26.
HeylighenF. (1992). Principles of systems and cybernetics: An evolutionary perspective. In TrapplR. (Ed.), Cybernetics and systems (Vol. 1, pp. 3–10). World Scientific.
27.
HofmanJ. M.WattsD. J.AtheyS.GaripF.GriffithsT. L.KleinbergJ.MargettsH.MullainathanS.SalganikM. J.VazireS.VespignaniA.YarkoniT. (2021). Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science. Nature, 595, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0
28.
HofstedeG. (1999). Religion, masculinity, and sex. In HofstedeG. (Ed.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures (pp. 192–209). Sage.
29.
HudsonV. M.BowenD. L.NielsenP. L. (2020). The first political order: How sex shapes governance and national security worldwide. Columbia University Press.
30.
HutR. A.PaolucciS.DorR.KyriacouC. P.DaanS. (2013). Latitudinal clines: An evolutionary view on biological rhythms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280, 20130433. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0433
31.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.
32.
IversenT.RosenbluthF. (2010). Women, work, and politics: The political economy of gender inequality. Yale University Press.
33.
KirbyK. R.GrayR. D.GreenhillS. J.JordanF. M.Gomes-NgS.BibikoH.-J.BlasiD. E.BoteroC. A.BowernC.EmberC. R.LeehrD.LowB. S.McCarterJ.DivaleW.GavinM. C. (2016). D-PLACE: A global database of cultural, linguistic and environmental diversity. PLOS ONE, 11(7), Article e0158391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158391
34.
KlasenS. (2002). Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross-country evidence on the effect of gender inequality in education on economic development. The World Bank Economic Review, 16, 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhf004
35.
KlaymanJ.HaY.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.211
36.
LangH. (1998). CONAN: An electronic code-text data-base for cross-cultural studies. World Cultures, 9, 13–56.
37.
LawrenceP. R.LorschJ. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Harvard University Press.
38.
LiC.ZuckermanM.DienerE. (2021). Culture moderates the relation between gender inequality and well-being. Psychological Science, 32, 823–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620972492
39.
LisovskiS.RamenofskyM.WingfieldJ. C. (2017). Defining the degree of seasonality and its significance for future research. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 57, 934–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icx040
McDonaldP. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26, 427–439. www.jstor.org/stable/172314
43.
MintzbergH. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Prentice-Hall.
44.
MuR. (2019). Aspects of gender in famine: Evidence from the Chinese great leap forward famine. In PreedyV. R.PatelV. B. (Eds.), Handbook of famine, starvation, and nutrient deprivation (pp. 61–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55387-0_105
MurdockG. P.WilsonS. F. (1972). Settlement patterns and community organization. Ethnology, 11, 254–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773219
48.
NolanP.LenskiG. (1999). Human societies: An introduction to macrosociology (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
49.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). SIGI 2019 global report: Transforming challenges into opportunities. Social Institutions and Gender Index. https://doi.org/10.1787/bc56d212-en
50.
ParkerP. M. (1997). National cultures of the world: A statistical reference. Greenwood Press.
51.
RossM. H. (1983). Political decision making and conflict: Additional cross-cultural codes and scales. Ethnology, 22, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773578
52.
RossM. H. (1993). The culture of conflict. Yale University Press.
53.
SchillC.AnderiesJ. M.LindahlT.FolkeC.PolaskyS.CárdenasJ. C.CrépinA.-S.JanssenM. A.NorbergJ.SchlüterM. (2019). A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nature Sustainability, 2, 1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0419-7
Van de VliertE.Van LangeP. A. M. (2019). Latitudinal psychology: An ecological perspective on creativity, aggression, happiness, and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 860–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619858067
64.
VarnumM. E. W.GrossmannI. (2017). Pathogen prevalence is associated with cultural changes in gender equality. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article 0003. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0003
65.
Von BertalanffyL. (1968). General system theory. George Braziller.
66.
WilligM. R.KaufmanD. M.StevensR. D. (2003). Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: Pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 273–309. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.012103.144032
67.
World Economic Forum. (2018). The global gender gap report 2018. World Economic Forum.
68.
YarkoniT.WestfallJ. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1100–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
