People are drawn to and like others who are physically attractive. In the present research, we investigated the influence of trait self-control on individuals’ interest in relationships with physically attractive others. We hypothesized that high (vs. low) self-control individuals would approach relationships by considering information beyond appearance about potential partners, including partners’ self-control. We additionally explored the influence of other traits (e.g., Big 5, self-esteem, and attachment styles) on relationship interest. Across studies, we consistently found that individuals with higher self-control avoided pursuing relationships with attractive individuals who display low self-control. In Study 3, we observed a similar pattern for three other traits: conscientiousness, extraversion, and positivity embracement. These results suggest perceivers’ self-control shapes relationship interest, particularly when attractive individuals possess less desirable qualities. The findings extend past research that attractiveness increases interest in others and highlights the potential for trait self-control to direct relationship interest during initial interactions.
AmbadyN.RosenthalR. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
2.
BeckerD. V.KenrickD. T.GuerinS.ManerJ. K. (2005). Concentrating on beauty: Sexual selection and sociospatial memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1643–1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279583
3.
BeehrT. A.GilmoreD. C. (1982). Applicant attractiveness as a perceived job-relevant variable in selection of management trainees. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/256084
4.
BornsteinJ. X.vanDellenM. R.ShafferA. (2017). Examining trait self-control and communication patterns in romantic couples using the actor-partner interaction model. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 222–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.002
5.
BradyA.BakerL. R.MillerR. S. (2020). Look but don’t touch? Self-regulation determines whether noticing attractive alternatives increases infidelity. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000578
6.
CarrierA.DompnierB.YzerbytV. (2019). Of nice and mean: The personal relevance of others’ competence drives perceptions of warmth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(11), 1549–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219835213
7.
CaviorN.DokeckiP. R. (1973). Physical attractiveness, perceived attitude similarity, and academic achievement as contributors to interpersonal attraction among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035081
8.
ChenF.GuoT. (2021). Effects of competence information on perceptions of warmth. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 24(4), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12452
9.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441
10.
ColeS.TropeY.BalcetisE. (2016). In the eye of the betrothed: Perceptual downgrading of attractive alternative romantic partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216646546
11.
ColvinC. R. (1993). “Judgable” people: Personality, behavior, and competing explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.861
12.
ConnellyB. S.OnesD. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212
13.
ConverseB. A.FishbachA. (2012). Instrumentality boosts appreciation: Helpers are more appreciated while they are useful. Psychological Science, 23(6), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611433334
14.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
15.
DionK.BerscheidE.WalsterE. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
16.
DionK. K.BerscheidE. (1974). Physical attractiveness and peer perception among children. Sociometry, 37(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786463
17.
DuckworthA. L.GendlerT. S.GrossJ. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247
18.
EastwickP. W.EaglyA. H.FinkelE. J.JohnsonS. E. (2011). Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: A double dissociation in predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 993–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024061
19.
EntM. R.BaumeisterR. F.TiceD. M. (2015). Trait self-control and the avoidance of temptation. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.031
20.
FisherM.CoxA. (2009). The influence of male facial attractiveness on women’s receptivity. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099332
21.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
22.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
FitzsimonsG. M.FishbachA. (2010). Shifting closeness: Interpersonal effects of personal goal progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018581
26.
FitzsimonsG. M.ShahJ. Y. (2008). How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.319
27.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
28.
FujitaK. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411165
GilmoreD. C.BeehrT. A.LoveK. G. (1986). Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions*. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00217.x
31.
GomillionS.LamarcheV. M.MurrayS. L.HarrisB. (2014). Protected by your self-control: The influence of partners’ self-control on actors’ responses to interpersonal risk. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(8), 873–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614538462
32.
HepperE. G.GramzowR. H.SedikidesC. (2010). Individual Differences in self-enhancement and self-protection strategies: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 781–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00633.x
33.
HirschmüllerS.SchmukleS. C.KrauseS.BackM. D.EgloffB. (2018). Accuracy of Self-esteem judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12316
34.
HofmannW.BaumeisterR. F.FörsterG.VohsK. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026545
35.
HofsteeW. K.De RaadB.GoldbergL. R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.146
36.
HoyleR.DavissonE. K. (2016). Varieties of self-control and their personality correlates. In VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (3rd ed., pp. 396–413).
37.
HuangS. A.LedgerwoodA.EastwickP. W. (2020). How do ideal friend preferences and interaction context affect friendship formation? Evidence for a domain- general relationship initiation process. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619845925
38.
ImhoffR.SchmidtA. F.GerstenbergF. (2014). Exploring the interplay of trait self–control and ego depletion: Empirical evidence for ironic effects. European Journal of Personality, 28(5), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1899
39.
KammrathL. K.PeetzJ. (2011). The limits of love: Predicting immediate versus sustained caring behaviors in close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.004
40.
KilianskiS. E. (2008). Who do you think I think I am? Accuracy in perceptions of others’ self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(2), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.07.004
41.
KoranyiN.RothermundK. (2012). When the grass on the other side of the fence doesn’t matter: Reciprocal romantic interest neutralizes attentional bias towards attractive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.012
42.
KovalC. Z.vanDellenM. R.FitzsimonsG. M.RanbyK. W. (2015). The burden of responsibility: Interpersonal costs of high self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 750–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000015
43.
LakeyB.RossL. T.ButlerC.BentleyK. (1996). Making social support judgments: The role of similarity and conscientiousness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1996.15.3.283
44.
LapkaS. P.KungF. Y. H.BrienzaJ. P.ScholerA. A. (2023). Determined yet dehumanized: People higher in self-control are seen as more robotic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221093109
45.
LemayE. P.ClarkM. S.GreenbergA. (2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful Is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209359700
46.
LorenzoG. L.BiesanzJ. C.HumanL. J. (2010). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood: Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1777–1782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610388048
47.
LudwigV. U.BerryB.CaiJ. Y.ChenN. M.CroneD. L.PlattM. L. (2022). The impact of disclosing emotions on ratings of interpersonal closeness, warmth, competence, and leadership ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 989826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989826
48.
LuxenM. F.Van De VijverF. J. R. (2006). Facial attractiveness, sexual selection, and personnel selection: When evolved preferences matter. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.357
49.
LydonJ. E. (2010). How to forego forbidden fruit: The regulation of attractive alternatives as a commitment mechanism: The regulation of attractive alternatives as a commitment mechanism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00283.x
50.
LydonJ. E.KarremansJ. C. (2015). Relationship regulation in the face of eye candy: A motivated cognition framework for understanding responses to attractive alternatives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.011
51.
ManerJ. K.KenrickD. T.BeckerD. V.DeltonA. W.HoferB.WilburC. J.NeubergS. L. (2003). Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1107–1120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1107
52.
ManerJ. K.RoubyD. A.GonzagaG. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: The evolved psychology of relationship maintenance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.04.003
53.
MarloweC. M.SchneiderS. L.NelsonC. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased?Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.11
54.
McDonaldJ. S.LetzringT. D. (2016). Judging personal values and personality traits: Accuracy and its relation to visibility. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.009
55.
McintyreJ. C.BarlowF. K.HaywardL. E. (2015). Stronger sexual desires only predict bold romantic intentions and reported infidelity when self-control is low. Australian Journal of Psychology, 67(3), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12073
56.
McNultyJ. K.MeltzerA. L.MakhanovaA.ManerJ. K. (2018). Attentional and evaluative biases help people maintain relationships by avoiding infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000127
57.
MillerA. G. (1970). Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Science, 19(4), 241–243. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328797
58.
OrehekE.ForestA. L.BarbaroN. (2018). A people-as-means approach to interpersonal relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617744522
59.
PronkT. M.KarremansJ. C. (2014). Does executive control relate to sacrificial behavior during conflicts of interests? Executive control and sacrificial behavior. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12024
60.
RighettiF.FinkenauerC. (2011). If you are able to control yourself, I will trust you: The role of perceived self-control in interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 874–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021827
61.
RitterS. M.KarremansJ. C.van SchieH. T. (2010). The role of self-regulation in derogating attractive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.010
62.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self. Basic Books.
63.
SeidmanG.MillerO. S. (2013). Effects of gender and physical attractiveness on visual attention to Facebook profiles. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0305
64.
ShannonM. L.StarkC. P. (2003). The influence of physical appearance on personnel selection. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(6), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.6.613
65.
SprecherS.ReganP. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502019004048
66.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
67.
TewsM. J.StaffordK.ZhuJ. (2009). Beauty revisited: The impact of attractiveness, ability, and personality in the assessment of employment suitability. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00454.x
68.
TisseraH.LydonJ. E.HumanL. J. (2023). Is what is beautiful good and still more accurately understood? A replication and extension of Lorenzo et al. (2010). European Journal of Personality, 37(4), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070221099688
69.
TsaiC.-Y.WangM.-T.TsengH.-T. (2016). The impact of tour guides’ physical attractiveness, sense of humor, and seniority on guide attention and efficiency. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 33(6), 824–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2015.1068264
70.
TuE.MaxwellJ. A.KimJ. J.PeragineD.ImpettE. A.MuiseA. (2022). Is my attachment style showing? Perceptions of a date’s attachment anxiety and avoidance and dating interest during a speed-dating event. Journal of Research in Personality, 100, 104269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104269
71.
vanDellenM. R.MeiselM. K.LynchB. P. (2017). Dynamics of self-control in egocentric social networks. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.010
72.
vanDellenM. R.Shah JamesY.LeanderN. P.DeloseJ. E.BornsteinJ. X. (2015). In good company: Managing interpersonal resources that support self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(6), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215580778
73.
Van DillenL. F.PapiesE. K.HofmannW. (2013). Turning a blind eye to temptation: How cognitive load can facilitate self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031262
74.
van LeeuwenM. L.MacraeC. N. (2004). Is beautiful always good? Implicit benefits of facial attractiveness. Social Cognition, 22(6), 637–649.
75.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908
76.
VohsK. D.FinkenauerC.BaumeisterR. F. (2011). The sum of friends’ and lovers’ self-control scores predicts relationship quality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610385710
77.
WangX.ChenH.ChenZ.LuoS. (2022). An exchange orientation results in an instrumental approach in intimate relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(4), 1144–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12530
78.
WestfallR.MillarM.WalshM. (2016). Effects of instructor attractiveness on learning. The Journal of General Psychology, 143(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2016.1200529
79.
WilliamsL. A.BartlettM. Y. (2015). Warm thanks: Gratitude expression facilitates social affiliation in new relationships via perceived warmth. Emotion, 15(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000017
80.
WilliamsonL. Z.WilkowskiB. M. (2020). Nipping temptation in the bud: Examining strategic self-control in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219883606
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
