Is self-control authentic? Across several hypothetical scenarios, participants perceived impulsive actions as more authentic for others (Study 1a) but self-control as more authentic for themselves (Study 1b). Study 2 partially replicated this asymmetry. Study 3 accounted for behavior positivity because self-control was typically the more positive action in the previous studies. Study 4 minimized the influence of positivity by framing the same behaviors as either impulsive or controlled; impulsive actions were deemed more authentic than self-control, but only for other people. An internal meta-analysis controlling for behavior positivity revealed that (a) more positive behaviors are more authentic, and (b) impulsive actions are more authentic than self-controlled actions, especially for others. This actor–observer asymmetry suggests that, even in the face of a strong tendency to perceive positive actions as authentic, there exists a competing tendency to view others’ impulsive actions as more authentic than self-control.
BaumeisterR. F. (1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 163–176.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.ExlineJ. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67, 1165–1194.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.SchmeichelB. J.VohsK. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 516–539). Guilford Press.
4.
BenchS. W.SchlegelR. J.DavisW. E.VessM. (2015). Thinking about change in the self and others: The role of self-discovery metaphors and the true self. Social Cognition, 33, 169–185.
5.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
6.
ChristyA. G.KimJ.VessM.SchlegelR. J.HicksJ. A. (2017). The reciprocal relationship between perceptions of moral goodness and knowledge of others’ true selves. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 910–917.
7.
De FreitasJ.CikaraM. (2018). Deep down my enemy is good: Thinking about the true self reduces intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 307–316.
8.
DoucerainM.DereJ.RyderA. G. (2013). Travels in hyper-diversity: Multiculturalism and the contextual assessment of acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 686–699.
9.
DunningD. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1–11.
10.
EnglishT.JohnO. P. (2013). Understanding the social effects of emotion regulation: The mediating role of authenticity for individual differences in suppression. Emotion, 13, 314–329.
11.
FleesonW.WiltJ. (2010). The relevance of Big Five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement?Journal of Personality, 78, 1353–1382.
12.
GoldmanB. M.KernisM. H. (2002). The role of authenticity in healthy psychological functioning and subjective well-being. Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 5, 18–21.
13.
GrayJ. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In EysenckH. J. (ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). Springer.
14.
HeiphetzL.StrohmingerN.YoungL. L. (2017). The role of moral beliefs, memories, and preferences in representations of identity. Cognitive Science, 41, 744–767.
15.
HongY-y.KheiM. (2014). Dynamic multiculturalism: The inter- play of socio-cognitive, neural, and genetic mechanisms In Benet-MartínezV.HongY. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multi-cultural identity (pp. 11–34). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199796694.013.026
16.
ItoM.HorikoshiM.KodamaM. (2009). A cross-sectional survey of age and sense of authenticity among Japanese. Psychological Reports, 105, 575–581. http://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.2.575-581
17.
JohnsonJ. T.StruthersN. J.BradleeP. (1988). Social knowledge and the “secret self”: The mediating effect of data base size on judgments of emotionality in the self and others. Social Cognition, 6, 319–344.
18.
Jongman-SerenoK. P.LearyM. R. (2016). Self-perceived authenticity is contaminated by the valence of one’s behavior. Self and Identity, 15, 283–301.
19.
KashimaY.KashimaE.FarsidesT.KimU.StrackF.WerthL.YukiM. (2004). Culture and context-sensitive self: The amount and meaning of context-sensitivity of phenomenal self differ across cultures. Self and Identity, 3, 125–141. http://doi.org/10.1080/13576500342000095a
20.
KernisM. H.GoldmanB. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283–357.
21.
KimJ.ChenK.DavisW. E.HicksJ. A.SchlegelR. J. (2019). Approaching the true self: Promotion focus predicts the experience of authenticity. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 165–176.
22.
KimJ.ChenK.RiveraG. N.HongE. K.KambleS.ScollonC. N.. . . SchlegelR. J. (2022). True-self-as-guide lay theory endorsement across five countries. Self and Identity, 1–24.
23.
KimJ.ChristyA. G.RiveraG. N.HicksJ. A.SchlegelR. J. (2021). Is the illusion of authenticity beneficial? Merely perceiving decisions as guided by the true self enhances decision satisfaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 80–90.
24.
KimJ.ChristyA. G.RiveraG. N.SchlegelR. J.HicksJ. A. (2018). Following one’s true self and the sacredness of cultural values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 100–103.
25.
KimJ.SetoE.ChristyA. G.HicksJ. A. (2016). Investing in the real me: Preference for experiential to material purchases driven by the motivation to search for true self-knowledge. Self and Identity, 15, 727–747.
26.
KokkorisM. D.HoelzlE.Alós-FerrerC. (2019). True to which self? Lay rationalism and decision satisfaction in self-control conflicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 417–447.
27.
KovácsB. (2019). Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: The exploration of audiences’ lay associations to authenticity across five domains. Review of General Psychology, 23, 32–59.
28.
LentonA. P.BruderM.SlabuL.SedikidesC. (2013). How does “being real” feel? The experience of state authenticity. Journal of Personality, 81, 276–289.
29.
LiuY.PerreweP. L. (2006). Are they for real? The interpersonal and intrapersonal outcomes of perceived authenticity. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 1, 204–214.
30.
MischelW.GilliganC. (1964). Delay of gratification, motivation for the prohibited gratification, and responses to temptation. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 411–417.
31.
MuravenM.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.
32.
NewmanG. E.BloomP.KnobeJ. (2014). Value judgments and the true self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 203–216.
33.
Page-GouldE. (2017). Multilevel modeling. In CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G.BerntsonG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 662–678). Cambridge University Press.
34.
PrenticeD. A. (1990). Familiarity and differences in self-and other-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 369–383.
35.
RiveraG. N.ChristyA. G.KimJ.VessM.HicksJ. A.SchlegelR. J. (2019). Understanding the relationship between perceived authenticity and well-being. Review of General Psychology, 23, 113–126.
36.
RiveraG. N.KelleyN. J.KimJ.HicksJ. A.SchlegelR. J. (2022). Perceptions of authenticity [Manuscript in preparation].
37.
RyanR. M.LaGuardiaJ. G.RawsthorneL. J. (2005). Self-complexity and the authenticity of self-aspects: Effects on well being and resilience to stressful events. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 431–448.
38.
SariçamH. (2015). Life satisfaction: Testing a structural equation model based on authenticity and subjective happiness. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46, 278–284.
39.
SavaniK.MarkusH. R.ConnerA. L. (2008). Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 861–876.
40.
SchlegelR. J.HicksJ. A.ArndtJ.KingL. A. (2009). Thine own self: True self-concept accessibility and meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 473–490.
41.
SchlegelR. J.HicksJ. A.DavisW. E.HirschK. A.SmithC. M. (2013). The dynamic interplay between perceived true self-knowledge and decision satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 542–558.
42.
SchlegelR. J.HicksJ. A.KingL. A.ArndtJ. (2011). Feeling like you know who you are: Perceived true self-knowledge and meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 745–756.
43.
SchmaderT.SedikidesC. (2018). State authenticity as fit to environment: The implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 228–259.
44.
SedikidesC.GreggA. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102–116.
45.
SlabuL.LentonA. P.SedikidesC.BruderM. (2014). Trait and state authenticity across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1347–1373. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114543520
46.
SmallenbroekO.ZelenskiJ. M.WhelanD. C. (2017). Authenticity as a eudaimonic construct: The relationships among authenticity, values, and valence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12, 197–209.
47.
StrohmingerN.KnobeJ.NewmanG. (2017). The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 551–560.
48.
SuhE. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1378–1391.
49.
WalumbwaF. O.AvolioB. J.ZhuW. (2008). How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61, 793–825.
50.
WestA. L.MuiseA.SasakiJ. Y. (2021). The cost of being “true to yourself” for mixed selves: Frame switching leads to perceived inauthenticity and downstream social consequences for biculturals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 829–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620944049
51.
WestA. L.ZhangR.YampolskyM. A.SasakiJ. Y. (2018). The potential cost of cultural fit: Frame switching undermines perceptions of authenticity in western contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2622.
52.
WickhamR. E. (2013). Perceived authenticity in romantic partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 878–887.
53.
WongC. A.LaschingerH. K. (2013). Authentic leadership, performance, and job satisfaction: The mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 947–959.
54.
WoodA. M.LinleyP. A.MaltbyJ.BaliousisM.JosephS. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 385–399.
55.
YzerbytV. Y.MullerD.JuddC. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 424–431.
56.
ZhangY.AlickeM. (2021). My true self is better than yours: Comparative bias in true self judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 216–231.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
