Honesty is a near universally valued trait. However, the term honesty captures a litany of traits and behaviors, obscuring research on social perceptions and trait measurement of honesty and creating philosophical difficulties in accounting for what (if anything) unifies this diversity. We applied a prototype analysis approach to identify the most central elements of lay honesty conceptualizations, identifying elements that come to mind and are explicitly acknowledged as important to honesty. In five studies (N = 1,442), U.S. American participants generated 6,000+ free responses characterizing honesty and indicated which subtraits and behaviors best represent honesty. Truthfulness was most central to lay honesty conceptualizations across all studies and several centrality indices (frequency among responses and participants, agreement across participants, priority in lists, explicit ratings), though several other features were prominent. Findings illuminate social perceptions of honesty, critique popular measurement of trait honesty, and offer empirical foundations for philosophical analysis of honesty.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
4.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2008). The HEXACO model of personality structure and the importance of the H factor. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1952–1962. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00134.x
5.
AtariM.HaidtJ.GrahamJ.KolevaS.StevensS. T.DehghaniM. (2022). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q6c9r
BokS. (1999). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. Vintage Books.
8.
BrambillaM.RusconiP.SacchiS.CherubiniP. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744
9.
BroughtonR. (1984). A prototype strategy for construction of personality scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1334–1346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1334
10.
CarrD. (2014). The human and educational significance of honesty as an epistemic and moral virtue. Educational Theory, 64(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12047
11.
DiebelsK. J.LearyM. R.ChonD. (2018). Individual differences in selfishness as a major dimension of personality: A reinterpretation of the sixth personality factor. Review of General Psychology, 22(4), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000155
FehrB. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.557
14.
FehrB.RussellJ. A. (1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 464–486. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.464
15.
FehrB.RussellJ. A.WardL. M. (1982). Prototypicality of emotions: A reaction time study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20(5), 253–254. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334831
16.
FleesonW. (2020). Live simply so that others may simply live: Trying to get clarity on the meaning of Honesty/Humility. European Journal of Personality, 34(4), 524–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2284
GilbertD. T.TafarodiR. W.MaloneP. S. (1993). You can’t not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221
19.
GoldbergL. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.
20.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS. P.DittoP. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
21.
GrahamJ.MeindlP.KolevaS.IyerR.JohnsonK. M. (2015). When values and behavior conflict: Moral pluralism and intrapersonal moral hypocrisy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(3), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12158
22.
GreggA. P.HartC. M.SedikidesC.KumashiroM. (2008). Everyday conceptions of modesty: A prototype analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 978–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316734
23.
GriceH. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In ColeP.MorganJ. L. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
HorstmannK. T.ZieglerM. (2020). Assessing personality states: What to consider when constructing personality state measures. European Journal of Personality, 34(6), 1037–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2266
30.
HursthouseR. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford University Press.
Janoff-BulmanR.SheikhS.HeppS. (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013779
33.
KamtekarR. (2004). Situationism and virtue ethics on the content of our character. Ethics, 114(3), 458–491. https://doi.org/10.1086/381696
34.
KearnsJ. N.FinchamF. D. (2004). A prototype analysis of forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264237
LambertN. M.FinchamF. D.GrahamS. M. (2011). Understanding the layperson’s perception of prayer: A prototype analysis of prayer. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021596
39.
LambertN. M.GrahamS. M.FinchamF. D. (2009). A prototype analysis of gratitude: Varieties of gratitude experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(9), 1193–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209338071
40.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2012). The H factor of personality: Why some people are manipulative, self-entitled, materialistic, and exploitive―And why it matters for everyone. Wilfred Laurier University Press.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2020). Why six factors, why it matters. European Journal of Personality, 34, 562–590.
43.
LuoS. X.van HorenF.MilletK.ZeelenbergM. (2022). What we talk about when we talk about hope: A prototype analysis. Emotion, 22(4), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000821
McGrathR. E.HanH.BrownM.MeindlP. (2022). What does character education mean to character education experts? A prototype analysis of expert opinions. Journal of Moral Education, 51(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1862073
47.
MillerC. B. (2021). Honesty: The philosophy and psychology of a neglected virtue. Oxford University Press.
48.
MorganB.GullifordL.KristjánssonK. (2014). Gratitude in the UK: A new prototype analysis and a cross-cultural comparison. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.898321
49.
NicholsS. (2004). Folk concepts and intuitions: From philosophy to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.09.001
50.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association.
51.
PurzyckiB. G.Jamieson-LaneA. (2017). AnthroTools: An R package for cross-cultural ethnographic data analysis. Cross-Cultural Research, 51(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116680352
52.
ReaderG. D.BrewerM. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.61
ReganP. C.BerscheidE. (1997). Gender differences in characteristics desired in a potential sexual and marriage partner. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 9(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v09n01_02
55.
ReganP. C.KocanE. R.WhitlockT. (1998). Ain’t love grand! A prototype analysis of the concept of romantic love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(3), 411–420.
56.
ReganP. C.LevinL.SprecherS.ChristopherF. S.GateR. (2000). Partner preferences: What characteristics do men and women desire in their short-term sexual and long-term romantic partners?Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 12(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_01
SanneyK. J.TrautmanL. J.YordyE. D.CowartT. W.SewellD. J. L. (2020). The importance of truth telling and trust. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 37(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlse.12099
59.
SantosC.MichaelsJ. L. (2020). What are the core features and dimensions of “spirituality”? Applying a partial prototype analysis to understand how laypeople mentally represent spirituality as a concept. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 14(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000380
60.
ShiY.GreggA. P.SedikidesC.CaiH. (2021). Lay conceptions of modesty in China: A prototype approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022120985318
61.
SkitkaL. J.ConwayP. (2019). Morality. In FinkelE. J.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 299–324). Oxford University Press.
62.
SmithJ. J. (1993). Using ANTHOPAC 3.5 and a spreadsheet to compute a free-list salience index. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 5(3), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X9300500301
63.
StoetG. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
64.
StoetG. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643
65.
TimpeK.BoydC. A. (2021). The virtues: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
66.
TrafimowD.TrafimowS. (1999). Mapping perfect and imperfect duties onto hierarchically and partially restrictive trait dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025006004
67.
UhlmannE. L.PizarroD. A.DiermeierD. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614556679
68.
WeidmanA. C.ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L. (2018). The psychological structure of humility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(1), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000112
69.
WestrateN. M.BluckS.GlückJ. (2019). Wisdom of the crowd: Exploring people’s conceptions of wisdom. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 97–121). Cambridge University Press.
WrightJ. C.WarrenM. T.SnowN. E. (2021). Understanding virtue: Theory and measurement. Oxford University Press.
72.
ZettlerI.ThielmannI.HilbigB. E.MoshagenM. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895036
73.
ZimmermanT.NjeriM.KhaderM.AllenJ.RoselliniA.EavesT. (2020). A review of truth-default theory: Implications for information behavior research. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), Article e312. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.312
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
