Behind the Blackpill: Self-Verification and Identity Fusion Predict Endorsement of Violence Against Women Among Self-Identified Incels

Abstract

Incels (involuntary celibates) have advocated for and even enacted violence against women. We explored two mechanisms that may underly incels’ actions: identity fusion and self-verification. Study 1 (n = 155) revealed stronger identity fusion (deep alignment) with the ingroup among men active in online incel communities compared to men active in other male-dominated groups. Study 2 (n = 113) showed that feeling self-verified by other incels predicted fusion with incels; fusion, in turn, predicted endorsement of past and future violence toward women. Study 3 (n = 283; preregistered) replicated the indirect effects from Study 2 and extended them by linking fusion to online harassment of women. All indirect effects were particularly strong among self-identified incels high in narcissism. We discuss the synergistic links between self-verification and identity fusion in fostering extreme behaviors and identify directions for future research.

Keywords

incels self/identity group processes self-verification identity fusion violence narcissism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alwin

D. F.

Hauser

R. M.

(1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094445

Ascher

(1986). The moralism of attitudes supporting intergroup violence. Political Psychology, 7(3), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791249

Back

M. D.

Küfner

A. C. P.

Dufner

Gerlach

T. M.

Rauthmann

J. F.

Denissen

J. J.

(2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431

Bosson

J. K.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (1999). Self-liking, self-competence, and the quest for self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1230–1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258005

Brooks

R. C.

Russo-Batterham

Blake

K. R.

(2022). Incel activity on social media linked to local mating ecology. Psychological Science, 33(2), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211036065

Bullock

J. G.

Green

D. P.

S. E.

(2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018933

Burnham

M. J.

Y. K.

Piedmont

R. L.

(2018). Who is MTurk? Personal characteristics and sample consistency of these online workers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 21(9–10), 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1486394

CCDH Quant Lab. (2022). The Incelosphere: Exposing pathways into incel communities and the harms they pose to women and children. Center for Countering Digital Hate. https://counterhate.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/CCDH-The-Incelosphere.pdf

Costello

Rolon

Thomas

A. G.

Schmitt

P. D.

(2022). Levels of well-being among men who are incel (involuntarily celibate). Evolutionary Psychological Science, 8, 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-022-00336-x

10.

Cottee

(2020). Incel (e)motives: Resentment, shame and revenge. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44, 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1822589

11.

Cronbach

L. J.

Furby

(1970). How we should measure “change”: Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029382

12.

Daly

S. E.

Reed

S. M.

(2022). “I think most of society hates us”: A qualitative thematic analysis of interviews with incels. Sex Roles, 86(1), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01250-5

13.

De La Ronde

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (1998). Partner verification: Restoring shattered images of our intimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.374

14.

Ellemers

Kortekaas

Ouwerkerk

J. W.

(1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3%3C371::AID-EJSP932%3E3.0.CO;2-U

15.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A.-G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

16.

Fiedler

Harris

Schott

(2018). Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests–An analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.008

17.

Flake

J. K.

Fried

E. I.

(2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393

18.

Flake

J. K.

Pek

Hehman

(2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063

19.

Fredman

L. A.

Buhrmester

M. D.

Gomez

Fraser

W. T.

Talaifar

Brannon

S. M.

Swann

W. B.

(2015). Identity fusion, extreme pro-group behavior, and the path to defusion: Identity fusion and extreme behavior. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(9), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12193

20.

Ging

(2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401

21.

Glace

A. M.

Dover

T. L.

Zatkin

J. G.

(2021). Taking the black pill: An empirical analysis of the “incel.” Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 22(2), 288–297.

22.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

23.

Gómez

Á.

Brooks

M. L.

Buhrmester

M. D.

Vázquez

Jetten

Swann

W. B

. (2011). On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022642

24.

Gómez

Á.

Chinchilla

Vázquez

López-Rodríguez

Paredes

Martínez

. (2020). Recent advances, misconceptions, untested assumptions, and future research agenda for identity fusion theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14, Article e12531. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12531

25.

Gómez

Á.

Seyle

D. C.

Huici

Swann

W. B

. (2009). Can self-verification strivings fully transcend the self–other barrier? Seeking verification of ingroup identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016358

26.

Hayes

A. F.

(2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach ( Little

T. D.

, Ed., 3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

27.

Hodapp

(2017). Men’s rights, gender, and social media. Rowman & Littlefield.

28.

Hoffman

Ware

Shapiro

(2020). Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459

29.

Høiland

(2019). Incels and the stories they tell: A narrative analysis of Incels’ shared stories on Reddit [Master’s thesis]. University of Oslo

30.

Jaki

Smedt

T. D.

Gwózdz

Panchal

Rossa

De Pauw

(2019). Online hatred of women in the incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak

31.

Jonason

P. K.

Webster

G. D.

(2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265

32.

Kesvani

(2019). “Currycels” and the unsurprising racism of the incel community. MEL Magazine. https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/currycels-and-the-unsurprising-racism-of-the-incel-community

33.

Kim

(2022). The tall tale of the White incel king of Thailand. MEL Magazine. https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/itsover-incel-thailand-seamaxxing

34.

Klee

(2022). The depressing rise of “Wordcels” and ”numbercels.” MEL Magazine. https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/wordcels-numbercels-definition

35.

Kwang

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (2010). Do people embrace praise even when they feel unworthy? A review of critical tests of self-enhancement versus self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310365876

36.

Lee

S. A.

(2020). Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Studies, 44(7), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481

37.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Dwyer

J. H.

(1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9301700202

38.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Pirlott

A. G.

(2015). Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314542878

39.

Martel

F. A.

Buhrmester

Gómez

Vázquez

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (2021). Why true believers make the ultimate sacrifice: Sacred values, moral convictions, or identity fusion? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 779120.

40.

McCauley

Moskalenko

(2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000062

41.

McCredie

M. N.

Morey

L. C.

(2019). Who are the Turkers? A characterization of MTurk workers using the personality assessment inventory. Assessment, 26(5), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118760709

42.

Moonshot. (2020). Incels: A guide to symbols and terminology. https://moonshotteam.com/resource/incels-a-guide-to-symbols-and-terminology/

43.

Morf

C. C.

Rhodewalt

(2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1

44.

Moskalenko

Burton

B. S.

Fernández-Garayzábal González

Bloom

M. M.

(2022). Secondhand conspiracy theories: The social, emotional and political tolls on loved ones of Qanon followers. Democracy and Security. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2022.2111305

45.

Moskalenko

González

J. F.-G.

Kates

Morton

(2022). Incel ideology, radicalization and mental health: A survey study. The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare, 4(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.21810/jicw.v4i3.3817

46.

Nagourney

Cieply

Feuer

Lovett

(2014, June 1). Before brief, deadly spree, trouble since age 8. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/02/us/elliot-rodger-killings-in-california-followed-years-of-withdrawal.html

47.

Neff

L. A.

Karney

B. R.

(2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.480

48.

O’Laughlin

K. D.

Martin

M. J.

Ferrer

(2018). Cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal mediation processes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(3), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454822

49.

Pelham

B. W.

Swann

W. B.

(1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.672

50.

Preacher

K. J.

Kelley

(2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658

51.

Ribeiro

M. H.

Blackburn

Bradlyn

De Cristofaro

Stringhini

Long

Greenberg

Zannettou

(2020). From pick-up artists to incels: A data-driven sketch of the manosphere. ArXiv:2001.07600 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07600

52.

Rousis

G. J.

(2022). Theories of extreme pro-group behavior: A meta-analysis [Manuscript submitted for publication].

53.

Schoemann

A. M.

Boulton

A. J.

Short

S. D.

(2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068

54.

Speckhard

Ellenberg

(2022). Self-reported psychiatric disorder and perceived psychological symptom rates among involuntary celibates (incels) and their perceptions of mental health treatment. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2022.2029933

55.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In Suls

Greenwald

A. G.

(Eds.), Social psychological perspectives on the self (2nd ed., pp. 33–66). Lawrence Erlbaum.

56.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (2012). Self-verification theory. In Van Lange

P. A. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Higgins

E. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 23–42). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n27

57.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. Buhrmester

M. D.

(2015). Identity fusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414551363

58.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. Buhrmester

M. D.

Gómez

Jetten

Bastian

Vázquez

Ariyanto

Besta

Christ

Cui

Finchilescu

González

Goto

Hornsey

Sharma

Susianto

Zhang

(2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 912–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036089

59.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. Gómez

Á.

Seyle

D. C.

Morales

J. F.

Huici

(2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013668

60.

Swann

W. B.

Hixon

J. G.

De La Ronde

(1992). Embracing the bitter “truth”: Negative self-concepts and marital commitment. Psychological Science, 3(2), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00010.x

61.

Swann

W. B.

Hixon

J. G.

Stein-Seroussi

Gilbert

D. T.

(1990). The fleeting gleam of praise: Cognitive processes underlying behavioral reactions to self-relevant feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.17

62.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. Jetten

Gómez

Á.

Whitehouse

Bastian

(2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028589

63.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. Kwan

V. S. Y.

Polzer

J. T.

Milton

L. P.

(2003). Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1396–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256868

64.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. Milton

L. P.

Polzer

J. T.

(2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.238

65.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. Pelham

B. W.

Krull

D. S.

(1989). Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 782–791.

66.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In Austin

W. G.

Worchel

(Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

67.

Tamhane

A. C.

(1979). A comparison of procedures for multiple comparisons of means with unequal variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482541

68.

Wen

Fan

(2015). Monotonicity of effect sizes: Questioning kappa-squared as mediation effect size measure. Psychological Methods, 20(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000029

69.

Whitehouse

McQuinn

Buhrmester

Swann

W. B.

(2014). Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(50), 17783–17785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416284111

70.

Wiesenfeld

B. M.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. Brockner

Bartel

(2007). Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1235–1253.

71.

Zell

Strickhouser

J. E.

Sedikides

Alicke

M. D.

(2020). The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 118–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000218

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB

0.04 MB

0.08 MB

0.17 MB