Incels (involuntary celibates) have advocated for and even enacted violence against women. We explored two mechanisms that may underly incels’ actions: identity fusion and self-verification. Study 1 (n = 155) revealed stronger identity fusion (deep alignment) with the ingroup among men active in online incel communities compared to men active in other male-dominated groups. Study 2 (n = 113) showed that feeling self-verified by other incels predicted fusion with incels; fusion, in turn, predicted endorsement of past and future violence toward women. Study 3 (n = 283; preregistered) replicated the indirect effects from Study 2 and extended them by linking fusion to online harassment of women. All indirect effects were particularly strong among self-identified incels high in narcissism. We discuss the synergistic links between self-verification and identity fusion in fostering extreme behaviors and identify directions for future research.
AlwinD. F.HauserR. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094445
2.
AscherW. (1986). The moralism of attitudes supporting intergroup violence. Political Psychology, 7(3), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791249
3.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. J. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
4.
BossonJ. K.SwannW. B.Jr. (1999). Self-liking, self-competence, and the quest for self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1230–1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258005
5.
BrooksR. C.Russo-BatterhamD.BlakeK. R. (2022). Incel activity on social media linked to local mating ecology. Psychological Science, 33(2), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211036065
6.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018933
7.
BurnhamM. J.LeY. K.PiedmontR. L. (2018). Who is MTurk? Personal characteristics and sample consistency of these online workers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 21(9–10), 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1486394
CostelloW.RolonV.ThomasA. G.SchmittP. D. (2022). Levels of well-being among men who are incel (involuntarily celibate). Evolutionary Psychological Science, 8, 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-022-00336-x
CronbachL. J.FurbyL. (1970). How we should measure “change”: Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 74(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029382
12.
DalyS. E.ReedS. M. (2022). “I think most of society hates us”: A qualitative thematic analysis of interviews with incels. Sex Roles, 86(1), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01250-5
13.
De La RondeC.SwannW. B.Jr. (1998). Partner verification: Restoring shattered images of our intimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.374
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
16.
FiedlerK.HarrisC.SchottM. (2018). Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests–An analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.008
17.
FlakeJ. K.FriedE. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
18.
FlakeJ. K.PekJ.HehmanE. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063
19.
FredmanL. A.BuhrmesterM. D.GomezA.FraserW. T.TalaifarS.BrannonS. M.SwannW. B. (2015). Identity fusion, extreme pro-group behavior, and the path to defusion: Identity fusion and extreme behavior. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(9), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12193
20.
GingD. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
21.
GlaceA. M.DoverT. L.ZatkinJ. G. (2021). Taking the black pill: An empirical analysis of the “incel.”Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 22(2), 288–297.
22.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
23.
GómezÁ.BrooksM. L.BuhrmesterM. D.VázquezA.JettenJ.SwannW. B. (2011). On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022642
24.
GómezÁ.ChinchillaJ.VázquezA.López-RodríguezL.ParedesB.MartínezM. (2020). Recent advances, misconceptions, untested assumptions, and future research agenda for identity fusion theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14, Article e12531. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12531
25.
GómezÁ.SeyleD. C.HuiciC.SwannW. B. (2009). Can self-verification strivings fully transcend the self–other barrier? Seeking verification of ingroup identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016358
26.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (LittleT. D., Ed., 3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
27.
HodappC. (2017). Men’s rights, gender, and social media. Rowman & Littlefield.
HøilandT. (2019). Incels and the stories they tell: A narrative analysis of Incels’ shared stories on Reddit [Master’s thesis]. University of Oslo
30.
JakiS.SmedtT. D.GwózdzM.PanchalR.RossaA.De PauwG. (2019). Online hatred of women in the incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak
31.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
KwangT.SwannW. B.Jr. (2010). Do people embrace praise even when they feel unworthy? A review of critical tests of self-enhancement versus self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310365876
36.
LeeS. A. (2020). Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Studies, 44(7), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481
MacKinnonD. P.PirlottA. G. (2015). Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314542878
39.
MartelF. A.BuhrmesterM.GómezA.VázquezA.SwannW. B.Jr. (2021). Why true believers make the ultimate sacrifice: Sacred values, moral convictions, or identity fusion?Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 779120.
40.
McCauleyC.MoskalenkoS. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000062
41.
McCredieM. N.MoreyL. C. (2019). Who are the Turkers? A characterization of MTurk workers using the personality assessment inventory. Assessment, 26(5), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118760709
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1
44.
MoskalenkoS.BurtonB. S.Fernández-Garayzábal GonzálezJ.BloomM. M. (2022). Secondhand conspiracy theories: The social, emotional and political tolls on loved ones of Qanon followers. Democracy and Security. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2022.2111305
45.
MoskalenkoS.GonzálezJ. F.-G.KatesN.MortonJ. (2022). Incel ideology, radicalization and mental health: A survey study. The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare, 4(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.21810/jicw.v4i3.3817
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.480
PelhamB. W.SwannW. B. (1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.672
50.
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
51.
RibeiroM. H.BlackburnJ.BradlynB.De CristofaroE.StringhiniG.LongS.GreenbergS.ZannettouS. (2020). From pick-up artists to incels: A data-driven sketch of the manosphere. ArXiv:2001.07600 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07600
52.
RousisG. J. (2022). Theories of extreme pro-group behavior: A meta-analysis [Manuscript submitted for publication].
53.
SchoemannA. M.BoultonA. J.ShortS. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
54.
SpeckhardA.EllenbergM. (2022). Self-reported psychiatric disorder and perceived psychological symptom rates among involuntary celibates (incels) and their perceptions of mental health treatment. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2022.2029933
55.
SwannW. B.Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In SulsJ.GreenwaldA. G. (Eds.), Social psychological perspectives on the self (2nd ed., pp. 33–66). Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
SwannW. B.Jr. (2012). Self-verification theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 23–42). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n27
SwannW. B.Jr.BuhrmesterM. D.GómezA.JettenJ.BastianB.VázquezA.AriyantoA.BestaT.ChristO.CuiL.FinchilescuG.GonzálezR.GotoN.HornseyM.SharmaS.SusiantoH.ZhangA. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 912–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036089
59.
SwannW. B.Jr.GómezÁ.SeyleD. C.MoralesJ. F.HuiciC. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013668
60.
SwannW. B.HixonJ. G.De La RondeC. (1992). Embracing the bitter “truth”: Negative self-concepts and marital commitment. Psychological Science, 3(2), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00010.x
61.
SwannW. B.HixonJ. G.Stein-SeroussiA.GilbertD. T. (1990). The fleeting gleam of praise: Cognitive processes underlying behavioral reactions to self-relevant feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.17
62.
SwannW. B.Jr.JettenJ.GómezÁ.WhitehouseH.BastianB. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028589
63.
SwannW. B.Jr.KwanV. S. Y.PolzerJ. T.MiltonL. P. (2003). Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1396–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256868
64.
SwannW. B.Jr.MiltonL. P.PolzerJ. T. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.238
65.
SwannW. B.Jr.PelhamB. W.KrullD. S. (1989). Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 782–791.
66.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
67.
TamhaneA. C. (1979). A comparison of procedures for multiple comparisons of means with unequal variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482541
68.
WenZ.FanX. (2015). Monotonicity of effect sizes: Questioning kappa-squared as mediation effect size measure. Psychological Methods, 20(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000029
69.
WhitehouseH.McQuinnB.BuhrmesterM.SwannW. B. (2014). Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(50), 17783–17785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416284111
70.
WiesenfeldB. M.SwannW. B.Jr.BrocknerJ.BartelC. (2007). Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1235–1253.
71.
ZellE.StrickhouserJ. E.SedikidesC.AlickeM. D. (2020). The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 118–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000218
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
