In this investigation, we tested the hypothesis that increased income inequality between individuals will reduce social affiliation within dyadic interactions. In three experiments, we examined the effects of income inequality on key indices of affiliation using semi-structured interactions. In the first two experiments, a participant and confederate were randomly assigned to a low- or high-power role and compensated mildly or extremely unequally. In Experiment 3, inequality and inequity were orthogonally manipulated to determine whether inequality’s social consequences are moderated by the fairness of the income distribution. We demonstrated that greater inequality produced more negative emotional responses, reduced desire for closeness, and harsher evaluations of one’s partner, regardless of one’s power role and the equitability of the income distribution. We also obtained evidence that greater inequality reduces behavioral warmth, although this effect was less consistent. Our results begin to unpack the psychological processes through which income inequality worsens societal well-being.
AlesinaA.La FerraraE. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 847–904. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554935
2.
AndersonC.BerdahlJ. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1362
3.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
4.
AtkinsonA. B.PikettyT.SaezE. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3–71. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.1.3
5.
BachorowskiJ.OwrenM. J. (2001). Not all laughs are alike: Voiced but not unvoiced laughter readily elicits positive affect. Psychological Science, 12(3), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00346
6.
BenedettiA. H.ChenS. (2018). High CEO-to-worker pay ratios negatively impact consumer and employee perceptions of companies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.003
7.
BergeronA. P.ZannaM. P. (1973). Group membership and belief similarity as determinants of interpersonal attraction in Peru. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(4), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202217300400402
8.
Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LundbergK. B.KayA. C.PayneB. K. (2015). Subjective status shapes political preferences. Psychological Science, 26(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614553947
9.
ChenS.LangnerC. A.Mendoza-DentonR. (2009). When dispositional and role power fit: Implications for self-expression and self–other congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 710–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014526
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
11.
ConnorP.StancatoD.YildirimU.LeeS.ChenS. (2020). Inequality in the minimal group paradigm: How relative wealth and its justification influence ingroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, Article 103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103967
12.
ConnorP.VarneyJ.KeltnerD.ChenS. (2021). Social class competence stereotypes are amplified by socially signaled economic inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220916640
13.
CôtéS.HouseJ.WillerR. (2015). High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(52), 15838–15843. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511536112
14.
CôtéS.KrausM. W.CarpenterN. C.PiffP. K.BeermannU.KeltnerD. (2017). Social affiliation in same-class and cross-class interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(2), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000258
15.
de VriesR.GoslingS.PotterJ. (2011). Income inequality and personality: Are less equal U.S. states less agreeable?Social Science & Medicine, 72(12), 1978–1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.046
16.
ElgarF. J.AitkenN. (2011). Income inequality, trust and homicide in 33 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 21(2), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq068
17.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed)stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
18.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
19.
FlanneryK.MarcusJ. (2012). The creation of inequality: How our prehistoric ancestors set the stage for monarchy, slavery, and empire. Harvard University Press.
20.
FredricksonB. L.TugadeM. M.WaughC. E.LarkinG. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.365
21.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
22.
HendriksA. (2012). SoPHIE—Software platform for human interaction experiments [Working paper]. University of Osnabrück.
23.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
24.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
25.
KawachiI.KennedyB. P. (2002). The health of nations: Why inequality is harmful to your health. New Press.
KeltnerD.HaidtJ. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13(5), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379168
28.
KoganA.SaslowL. R.ImpettE. A.OveisC.KeltnerD.SaturnS. R. (2011). Thin-slicing study of the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene and the evaluation and expression of the prosocial disposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(48), 19189–19192. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112658108
29.
KrausM. W.MendesW. B. (2014). Sartorial symbols of social class elicit class-consistent behavioral and physiological responses: A dyadic approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2330–2340. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000023
30.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357
31.
KrausM. W.ParkJ. W.TanJ. J. X. (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422–435.
32.
LammersJ.GalinskyA. D.GordijnE. H.OttenS. (2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611418679
33.
LarzelereR. E.HustonT. L. (1980). The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(3), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.2307/351903
34.
LeachC. W.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
35.
LevittS. D.ListJ. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.153
36.
MageeJ. C.SmithP. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472732
37.
McAuliffeW. H. B.ForsterD. E.PhilippeJ.McCulloughM. E. (2018). Digital altruists: Resolving key questions about the empathy–altruism hypothesis in an internet sample. Emotion, 18(4), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000375
38.
NishiA.ShiradoH.RandD. G.ChristakisN. A. (2015). Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature, 526(7573), 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15392
39.
NortonM. I.ArielyD. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524
PayneB. K.Brown-IannuzziJ.HannayJ. W. (2017). Economic inequality increases risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(18), 4643–4648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616453114
42.
ReedL. I.DeScioliP.PinkerS. A. (2014). The commitment function of angry facial expressions. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1511–1517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614531027
43.
RustichiniA.VostroknutovA. (2014). Merit and justice: An experimental analysis of attitude to inequality. PLOS ONE, 9(12), Article e114512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114512
44.
ShariffA. F.WiwadD.AkninL. B. (2016). Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: Cross-national and experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635596
van KleefG. A.OveisC.van dL.LuoKoganA.GoetzJ.KeltnerD. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1315–1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02241.x
48.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2010). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. Penguin.
YzerbytV. Y.KervynN.JuddC. M. (2008). Compensation versus halo: The unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1110–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208318602
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
