Previous research has demonstrated an inverse relation between subjective social class (SSC) and performance on emotion recognition tasks. Study 1 (N = 418) involved a preregistered replication of this effect using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task and the Cambridge Mindreading Face-Voice Battery. The inverse relation replicated; however, exploratory analyses revealed a significant interaction between sex and SSC in predicting emotion recognition, indicating that the effect was driven by males. In Study 2 (N = 745), we preregistered and tested the interaction on a separate archival dataset. The interaction replicated; the association between SSC and emotion recognition again occurred only in males. Exploratory analyses (Study 3; N = 381) examined the generalizability of the interaction to incidental face memory. Our results underscore the need to reevaluate previous research establishing the main effects of social class and sex on emotion recognition abilities, as these effects apparently moderate each other.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592.
2.
AntonoplisS. (2022). Studying socioeconomic status: Conceptual problems and an alternative path forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221093615
3.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.HillJ.RasteY.PlumbI. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251.
4.
BenensonJ. F.WebbC. E.WranghamR. W. (2022). Self-protection as an adaptive female strategy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, E128.
5.
BjornsdottirR. T.AlaeiR.RuleN. O. (2017). The perceptive proletarian: Subjective social class predicts interpersonal accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 41(2), 185–201.
6.
BrodyL. R.HallJ. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In LewisM.HavilandJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447–460). Guilford.
7.
CarliL. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55(1), 81–99.
8.
ColarelliS. M.SprangerJ. L.HechanovaM. R. (2006). Women, power, and sex composition in small groups: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(2), 163–184.
9.
CundiffJ. M.MatthewsK. A. (2017). Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 36(12), 1109–1125.
10.
DearyI. J.ThorpeG.WilsonV.StarrJ. M.WhalleyL. J. (2003). Population sex differences in IQ at age 11: The Scottish mental survey 1932. Intelligence, 31(6), 533–542.
11.
DemakakosP.NazrooJ.BreezeE.MarmotM. (2008). Socioeconomic status and health: The role of subjective social status. Social Science & Medicine, 67(2), 330–340.
12.
DeveneyC. M.ChenS. H.WilmerJ. B.ZhaoV.SchmidtH. B.GermineL. (2018). How generalizable is the inverse relationship between social class and emotion perception?PLOS ONE, 13(10), Article e0205949.
13.
DietzeP.KnowlesE. D. (2016). Social class and the motivational relevance of other human beings: Evidence from visual attention. Psychological Science, 27(11), 1517–1527.
14.
DietzeP.KnowlesE. D. (2021). Social class predicts emotion perception and perspective- taking performance in adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 42–56.
15.
DietzeP.OlderbakS.HildebrandtA.KaltwasserL.KnowlesE. D. (2022). A lower-class advantage in face memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. . https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221125599.
16.
EaglyA. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38(9), 971–981.
17.
ElfenbeinH. A.AmbadyN. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 128(2), 203.
18.
EuteneuerF. (2014). Subjective social status and health. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 27(5), 337–343.
19.
GearyD. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. American Psychological Association.
20.
GolanO.Baron-CohenS.HillJ. (2006). The Cambridge mindreading (CAM) face-voice battery: Testing complex emotion recognition in adults with and without Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(2), 169–183.
21.
GonçalvesA. R.FernandesC.PasionR.Ferreira-SantosF.BarbosaF.Marques-TeixeiraJ. (2018). Effects of age on the identification of emotions in facial expressions: A meta-analysis. PeerJ, 6, Article e5278.
22.
GrayH.LythA.McKennaC.StothardS.TymmsP.CoppingL. (2019). Sex differences in variability across nations in reading, mathematics and science: A meta- analytic extension of Baye and Monseur (2016). Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 7(1), 1–29.
23.
GrossmannI.VarnumM. E. (2011). Social class, culture, and cognition. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 81–89.
24.
HallJ. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
HampsonE.IstasyP.OwaisS.ChowJ. A.HowidiB.OuelletteS. J. (2021). Sex differences in the recognition of children’s emotional expressions: A test of the fitness threat hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 7(1), 45–60.
26.
HayesA. F.CaiL. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722.
27.
HeW. J.WongW. C. (2011). Gender differences in creative thinking revisited: Findings from analysis of variability. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7), 807–811.
28.
HedgesL. V.NowellA. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269(5220), 41–45.
29.
JackmanM. R.JackmanR. W. (1983). Class awareness in the United States. University of California Press.
30.
JohnsonW.CarothersA.DearyI. J. (2008). Sex differences in variability in general intelligence: A new look at the old question. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 518–531.
31.
JuC.DuanY.YouX. (2015). Retesting the greater male variability hypothesis in mainland China: A cross-regional study. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 85–89.
32.
KarwowskiM.JankowskaD. M.GajdaA.MarczakM.GroyeckaA.SorokowskiP. (2016). Greater male variability in creativity outside the WEIRD world. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 467–470.
33.
KirklandR. A.PetersonE.BakerC. A.MillerS.PulosS. (2013). Meta-analysis reveals adult female superiority in “Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test.”North American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 121–146.
34.
KirkpatrickL. A.EllisB. J. (2001). An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In FletcherG. J. O.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (Vol. 2, pp. 411–436). Blackwell Publishers.
35.
KrausM. W.CôtéS.KeltnerD. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716–1723.
36.
KrausM. W.HorbergE. J.GoetzJ. L.KeltnerD. (2011). Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1376–1388.
37.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992–1004.
38.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572.
39.
KretM. E.De GelderB. (2012). Sex differences in processing emotional signals of others. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1211–1221.
40.
LeeH. J.MacbethA. H.PaganiJ. H.Young 3rdW. S. (2009). Oxytocin: The great facilitator of life. Progress in Neurobiology, 88(2), 127–151.
41.
LeppanenJ.NgK. W.TchanturiaK.TreasureJ. (2017). Meta-analysis of the effects of intranasal oxytocin in interpretation and expression of emotions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 78, 125–144.
42.
MahadevanN.GreggA. P.SedikidesC. (2019). Is self-regard a sociometer or a hierometer? Self-esteem tracks status and inclusion, narcissism tracks status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(3), 444–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000189
43.
McClureE. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424–453.
44.
MillA.AllikJ.RealoA.ValkR. (2009). Age-related differences in emotion recognition ability: A cross-sectional study. Emotion, 9(5), 619–630.
45.
MonroyM.CowenA. S.KeltnerD. (2022). Intersectionality in emotion signaling and recognition: The influence of gender, ethnicity, and social class. Emotion, 22(8), 1980–1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001082
46.
MorgenrothT.RyanM. K. (2021). The effects of gender trouble: An integrative theoretical framework of the perpetuation and disruption of the gender/sex binary. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1113–1142.
47.
PollakS. D. (2008). Mechanisms linking early experience and the emergence of emotions: Illustrations from the study of maltreated children. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 370–375.
48.
PrägP.MillsM. C.WittekR. (2016). Subjective socioeconomic status and health in cross- national comparison. Social Science & Medicine, 149, 84–92.
49.
RaginsB. R.SundstromE. (1989). Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 51–88.
50.
RuffmanT.HenryJ. D.LivingstoneV.PhillipsL. H. (2008). A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(4), 863–881.
51.
Sánchez NúñezM. T.Fernández-BerrocalP.MontañésJ.LatorreJ. M. (2008). Does emotional intelligence depend on gender? The socialization of emotional competencies in men and women and its implications. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15, 455–474.
52.
ShahrestaniS.KempA. H.GuastellaA. J. (2013). The impact of a single administration of intranasal oxytocin on the recognition of basic emotions in humans: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 38, 1929–1936.
53.
SmithJ. E.von RuedenC. R.Van VugtM.FichtelC.KappelerP. M. (2021). An evolutionary explanation for the female leadership paradox. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, Article 676805.
54.
StellarJ. E.ManzoV. M.KrausM. W.KeltnerD. (2012). Class and compassion: Socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering. Emotion, 12(3), 449–459.
55.
ThompsonA. E.VoyerD. (2014). Sex differences in the ability to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 28(7), 1164–1195.
WierengaL. M.DoucetG. E.DimaD.AgartzI.AghajaniM.AkudjeduT. N.. . . WittfeldK. (2022). Greater male than female variability in regional brain structure across the lifespan. Human Brain Mapping, 43(1), 470–499.
59.
WrightR.RiedelR.SechrestL.LaneR. D.SmithR. (2018). Sex differences in emotion recognition ability: The mediating role of trait emotional awareness. Motivation and Emotion, 42(1), 149–160.
60.
YeungM. K. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorder: The specificity of deficits and the role of task characteristics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 133, Article 104518.
61.
ZellE.StrickhouserJ. E.KrizanZ. (2018). Subjective social status and health: A meta- analysis of community and society ladders. Health Psychology, 37(10), 979–987.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
