Social comparison theories suggest that ingroups are strengthened whenever important outgroups are weakened (e.g., by losing status or power). It follows that ingroups have little reason to help outgroups facing an existential threat. We challenge this notion by showing that ingroups can also be weakened when relevant comparison outgroups are weakened, which can motivate ingroups to strategically offer help to ensure the outgroups’ survival as a highly relevant comparison target. In three preregistered studies, we showed that an existential threat to an outgroup with high (vs. low) identity relevance affected strategic outgroup helping via two opposing mechanisms. The potential demise of a highly relevant outgroup increased participants’ perceptions of ingroup identity threat, which was positively related to helping. At the same time, the outgroup’s misery evoked schadenfreude, which was negatively related to helping. Our research exemplifies a group’s secret desire for strong outgroups by underlining their importance for identity formation.
Bankie. (2008, December11). Anyone else miss Aureal? [Online forum post]. Hard Forum. https://tinyurl.com/y2bcx4ra
2.
BerendtJ.UhrichS. (2018). Rivalry and fan aggression: Why acknowledging conflict reduces tension between rival fans and downplaying makes things worse. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(4), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2018.1424226
3.
BranscombeN. R.EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Blackwell Publishing.
4.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
5.
BrewerM. B. (2003). Optimal distinctiveness, social identity, and the self. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 480–491). The Guilford Press.
6.
CikaraM.BruneauE. G.SaxeR. R. (2011). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411408713
7.
CikaraM.FiskeS. T. (2012). Stereotypes and schadenfreude: Affective and physiological markers of pleasure at outgroup misfortunes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611409245
8.
ConverseB. A.ReinhardD. A. (2016). On rivalry and goal pursuit: Shared competitive history, legacy concerns, and strategy selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000038
ElsbachK. D.BhattacharyaC. B. (2001). Defining who you are by what you’re not: Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Association. Organization Science, 12(4), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.393.10638
11.
FeatherN. T. (2008). Effects of observer’s own status on reactions to a high achiever’s failure: Deservingness, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530701458068
12.
FeatherN. T.ShermanR. (2002). Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720202800708
GiessnerS. R.VikiG. T.OttenS.TerryD. J.TäuberS. (2006). The challenge of merging: Merger patterns, premerger status, and merger support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282151
15.
HalabiS.DovidioJ. F.NadlerA. (2016). Help that hurts? Perceptions of intergroup assistance. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 53, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.05.007
16.
HareliS.WeinerB. (2002). Dislike and envy as antecedents of pleasure at another’s misfortune. Motivation and Emotion, 26(4), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022818803399
HirschbergerG.Ein-DorT.LeidnerB.SaguyT. (2016). How is existential threat related to intergroup conflict? Introducing the multidimensional existential threat (MET) model. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01877
20.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1990). Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In AbramsD.HoggM. A. (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 28–47). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
21.
HopkinsN.ReicherS.HarrisonK.CassidyC.BullR.LevineM. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 776–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301023
22.
JensenO. (2018, September). Endstation Regionalliga: Wenn Traditionsvereine ums Überleben kämpfen [Last stop third division: When traditional clubs fight for their survival]. Web.de. https://tinyurl.com/yc236468
23.
JettenJ.SpearsR.PostmesT. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 862–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.862
24.
KalraA.SobermanD. A. (2008). The curse of competitiveness: How advice from experienced colleagues and training can hurt marketing profitability. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKG.72.3.032
25.
KilduffG. J.ElfenbeinH. A.StawB. M. (2010). The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 943–969. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533171
26.
KilduffG. J.GalinskyA. D.GalloE.ReadeJ. J. (2016). Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1508–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0545
27.
LeachC. W.SpearsR. (2009). Dejection at in-group defeat and schadenfreude toward second-and third-party out-groups. Emotion, 9(5), 659–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016815
28.
LeachC. W.SpearsR.BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 932–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.932
29.
LevineM.ProsserA.EvansD.ReicherS. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271651
30.
LiX.McAllisterD. J.IliesR.GloorJ. L. (2019). Schadenfreude: A counternormative observer response to workplace mistreatment. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0134
31.
MurtaghN.GaterslebenB.UzzellD. (2012). Self-identity threat and resistance to change: Evidence from regular travel behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.008
32.
NadlerA. (2002). Inter-group helping relations as power relations: Maintaining or challenging social dominance between groups through helping. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00272
33.
NadlerA.Harpaz-GorodeiskyG.Ben-DavidY. (2009). Defensive helping: Threat to group identity, ingroup identification, status stability, and common group identity as determinants of intergroup help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015968
34.
NolteD. (2022, February). “Mir fehlen die Schalker—Fast” [“I miss Schalke—Almost”]. T-Online.de. https://tinyurl.com/ywz59exe
35.
OuwerkerkJ. W.van DijkW. W.VonkemanC. C.SpearsR. (2018). When we enjoy bad news about other groups: A social identity approach to out-group schadenfreude. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216663018
36.
PommerenkeT.StotzP. (2018, November). Freunde und Rivalen [Friends and Rivals]. Spiegel Online. https://tinyurl.com/yckrp7fz
37.
ReedA.IIAquinoK. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1270–1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1270
38.
SchindlerR.KörnerA.BauerS.HadjiS.RudolphU. (2015). Causes and consequences of schadenfreude and sympathy: A developmental analysis. PLOS ONE, 10(10), Article ee0137669. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137669
39.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
40.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey.
41.
TarrantM.DazeleyS.CottomT. (2009). Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X373589
42.
T-Online. (2013, June). Kölner Haie rufen zur Hilfe ihres Erzrivalen auf [Cologne Sharks call for help for their archrival]. T-Online.de. https://tinyurl.com/bd738hkx
43.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
44.
van DijkW. W.OuwerkerkJ. W.GoslingaS.NiewegM.GallucciM. (2006). When people fall from grace: Reconsidering the role of envy in schadenfreude. Emotion, 6(1), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.156
45.
van KnippenbergD.WilkeH. (1992). Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220204
46.
van LeeuwenE. (2017). The SOUTH model: On the pros and cons of strategic outgroup helping. In van LeeuwenE.ZagefkaH. (Eds.), Intergroup helping (pp. 131–158). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53026-0_7
47.
van LeeuwenEHarinckF. (2016). Increasing intergroup distinctiveness: The benefits of third party helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(10), 1402–1415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216662867
48.
van LeeuwenEvan KnippenbergD.EllemersN. (2003). Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006001
49.
WeiselO.BöhmR. (2015). “Ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in intergroup conflict between natural groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.008
50.
WohlM. J.BranscombeN. R.ReysenS. (2010). Perceiving your group’s future to be in jeopardy: Extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210372505
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
