This study investigated correlated change between the Big Five personality traits and perceived social support in old age. Two data waves with an 8-year span from the Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study on Adult Development (ILSE) were utilized. The longitudinal sample for this study consisted of 491 older adults (aged 64–68 years at T1). Four different aspects of perceived availability of social support were assessed (emotional support, practical support, social integration, and social strain). The Big Five personality traits were assessed with the Neuroticism–Extraversion–Openness Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Results show significant latent concurrent correlations and correlated changes between personality traits and social support. Notably, correlated change with social support types differed depending on the Big Five traits being evaluated, with changes in extraversion, neuroticism, and agreeableness being the traits most associated with changes in social support types, and openness being least associated. Results are discussed through a life span development lens in light of past research.
AllemandM.OlaruG. (2021). Responses to interpersonal transgressions from early adulthood to old age. Psychology and Aging, 36(6), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000610
3.
AllemandM.SchaffhuserK.MartinM. (2015). Long-term correlated change between personality traits and perceived social support in middle adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215569492
4.
AllemandM.ZimprichD.HertzogC. (2007). Cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal age changes of personality in middle adulthood and old age. Journal of Personality, 75(2), 323–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00441.x
5.
AllemandM.ZimprichD.MartinM. (2008). Long-term correlated change in personality traits in old age. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013239
6.
AnglimJ.HorwoodS.SmillieL. D.MarreroR. J.WoodJ. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226
7.
ArensonM.BernatE.De Los ReyesA.NeylanT. C.CohenB. E. (2021). Social support, social network size, and suicidal ideation: A nine-year longitudinal analysis from the Mind Your Heart Study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 135, 318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.017
8.
AschwandenD.KliegelM.AllemandM. (2018). Cognitive complaints mediate the effect of cognition on emotional stability across 12 years in old age. Psychology and Aging, 33(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000246
9.
BaltesP. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.366
10.
BergA. I.JohanssonB. (2014). Personality change in the oldest–old: Is it a matter of compromised health and functioning?. Journal of Personality, 82(1), 25–31.
11.
BleidornW.HopwoodC. J. (2019). Stability and change in personality traits over the lifespan. Handbook of Personality Development, 1, 237–252.
12.
BleidornW.HopwoodC. J.LucasR. E. (2018). Life events and personality trait change. Journal of Personality, 86(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12286
13.
BorkenauP.OstendorfF. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae: Handanweisung. Hogrefe.
14.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). SAGE.
15.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
16.
CarstensenL. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(5782), 1913–1915.
CohenJ. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98–101.
19.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13.
20.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R.DyeD. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
21.
DenissenJ. J. A.van AkenM. A. G.RobertsB. W. (2011). Personality development across the life span. In Chamorro-PremuzicT.von StummS.FurnhamA. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbooks of personality and individual differences (pp. 77–100). Wiley Blackwell.
22.
FakoyaO. A.McCorryN. K.DonnellyM. (2020). Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews. BMC public health, 20(1), 1–14.
23.
FydrichT.GeyerM.HesselA.SommerG.BrählerE. (1999). Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung an einer repräsentativen Stichprobe. Diagnostica, 45(4), 212–216.
24.
FydrichT.SommerG.BählerE. (2007). F-SozU: Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung [F-SozU: Questionnaire for the assessment of social support]. Hogrefe.
25.
GrahamE. K.WestonS. J.GerstorfD.YonedaT. B.BoothT.BeamC. R.PetkusA. J.DreweliesJ.HallA. N.BastaracheE. D.EstabrookR.KatzM. J.TurianoN. A.LindenbergerU.SmithJ.WagnerG. G.PedersenN. L.AllemandM.SpiroA.III. . . MroczekD. K. (2020). Trajectories of Big Five personality traits: A coordinated analysis of 16 longitudinal samples. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2259
HeckhausenJ.WroschC.SchulzR. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017668
29.
HillP. L.PayneB. R.JacksonJ. J.Stine-MorrowE. A.RobertsB. W. (2014). Perceived social support predicts increased conscientiousness during older adulthood. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(4), 543–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt024
30.
HillP. L.WestonS. J.JacksonJ. J. (2014). Connecting social environment variables to the onset of major specific health outcomes. Psychology & Health, 29, 753–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.884221
31.
HillP. L.WestonS. J.JacksonJ. J. (2018). The co-development of perceived support and the Big Five in middle and older adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025417690262
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.LaytonJ. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS MEDICINE, 7(7), Article e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
34.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
35.
HuttemanR.HenneckeM.OrthU.ReitzA. K.SpechtJ. (2014). Developmental tasks as a framework to study personality development in adulthood and old age. European Journal of Personality, 28, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1959
36.
JacksonJ. J.BeckE. D. (2021). Personality development beyond the mean: Do life events shape personality variability, structure, and ipsative continuity?The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa093
37.
JacobsS.HoltzerR. (2021). Predicting change in perceived social support in late life: The role of personality and gender. Aging & Mental Health, 25(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1671317
38.
KandlerC.KornadtA. E.HagemeyerB.NeyerF. J. (2015). Patterns and sources of personality development in old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000028
39.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
40.
KlimstraT. A.HaleW. W.IIIRaaijmakersQ. A.BranjeS. J.MeeusW. H. (2009). Maturation of personality in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 898–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014746
41.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
42.
MalouffJ. M.ThorsteinssonE. B.SchutteN. S.BhullarN.RookeS. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.004
43.
MannF. D.DeYoungC. G.KruegerR. F. (2021). Patterns of cumulative continuity and maturity in personality and well-being: Evidence from a large longitudinal sample of adults. Personality and individual differences, 169, 109737.
McArdleJ. J.NesselroadeJ. R. (2014). Longitudinal data analysis using structural equation models. American Psychological Association.
46.
MeredithW.HornJ. L. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In CollinsL. M.SayerA. G. (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 203–240). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10409-007
47.
MõttusR.JohnsonW.DearyI. J. (2012). Personality traits in old age: Measurement and rank-order stability and some mean-level change. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023690
48.
MroczekD. K.AlmeidaD. M.SpiroA.PaffordC. (2006). Modeling intraindividual stability and change in personality. In MroczekD. K.LittleT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 163–180). Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide. Author.
PinquartM.SorensenS. (2001). Influences on loneliness in older adults: A meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(4), 245–266.
53.
RobertsB. W.KuncelN. R.ShinerR.CaspiA.GoldbergL. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
56.
RobertsB. W.WoodD. (2006). Personality development in the context of the neo-socioanalytic model of personality. In MroczekD. K.LittleT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 11–39). Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
RobertsB. W.WoodD.CaspiA. (2008). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 375–398). Guilford Press.
58.
RobertsS. G.WilsonR.FedurekP.DunbarR. I. (2008). Individual differences and personal social network size and structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 954–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.033
59.
RustingC. L.LarsenR. J. (1997). Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00246-2
60.
SchwabaT.BleidornW. (2018). Individual differences in personality change across the adult life span. Journal of Personality, 86(3), 450–464.
61.
SeniaJ. M.DonnellanM. B. (2019). Personality development and relationships in adulthood. In McAdamsD. P.ShinerR. L.TackettJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 572–588). Guilford Press.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
64.
StaudingerU. M.BluckS. (2001.). A view on midlife development from life-span theory. In LachmanM. E. (Ed.), Handbook of midlife development (pp. 3–39). John Wiley.
65.
SwickertR. (2009). Personality and social support. In CorrP.MatthewsG. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 524–540). Cambridge University Press.
66.
TaylorS. E. (2011). Social support: A review. In FriedmanM. S. (Ed.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). Oxford University Press.
67.
TerraccianoA.CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (2006). Personality plasticity after age 30. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(8), 999–1009.
68.
TurianoN. A.PitzerL.ArmourC.KarlamanglaA.RyffC. D.MroczekD. K. (2012). Personality trait level and change as predictors of health outcomes: Findings from a national study of Americans (MIDUS). Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(1), 4–12.
69.
UchinoB. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A lifespan perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x
70.
UdayarS.UrbanaviciuteI.RossierJ. (2020). Perceived social support and Big Five personality traits in middle adulthood: A 4-year cross-lagged path analysis. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15, 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9694-0
71.
WagnerJ.LüdtkeO.RobertsB. W.TrautweinU. (2014). Who belongs to me? Social relationship and personality characteristics in the transition to young adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 28(6), 586–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1974
72.
WagnerJ.RamN.SmithJ.GerstorfD. (2016). Personality trait development at the end of life: Antecedents and correlates of mean-level trajectories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000071
73.
WestonS. J.LewisN. A.HillP. L. (2020). Building sense of purpose in older adulthood: Examining the role of supportive relationships. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1725607
74.
WilksS. E.CroomB. (2008). Perceived stress and resilience in Alzheimer’s disease caregivers: Testing moderation and mediation models of social support. Aging and Mental Health, 12(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860801933323
75.
WortmanJ.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2012). Stability and change in the Big Five personality domains: Evidence from a longitudinal study of Australians. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029322
76.
WrzusC.HänelM.WagnerJ.NeyerF. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028601
77.
WrzusC.ZimmermannJ.MundM.NeyerF. J. (2017). Friendships in young and middle adulthood: Normative patterns and personality differences. In HojjatM.MoyerA. (Eds.), The psychology of friendship (pp. 21–28). Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
