Do people accurately perceive their partner’s humor style? The current study extends work on partner perception by examining accuracy and bias in people’s perception of their partners’ humor styles—a subjective, evaluative, and important factor in relationship satisfaction. We recruited 337 heterosexual couples (N = 674 individuals, Mage = 65.71 years, SD = 12.107) who completed self-reports and partner-reports of humor styles. Truth and Bias modeling revealed that, although bias varied across humor styles, participants consistently demonstrated accuracy in their judgments of their partner’s humor styles. Bias forces were moderated by relationship satisfaction such that assumed similarity biases were stronger among those in particularly satisfying relationships.
AcitelliL. K.YoungA. M. (1996). Gender and thought in relationships. In FletcherG. J. O.FitnessJ. (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 147–168). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
AlbrightL.KennyD. A.MalloyT. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 387–395.
3.
BareldsD. P.Barelds-DijkstraP. (2010). Humor in intimate relationships: Ties among sense of humor, similarity in humor and relationship quality. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23(4), 447–465.
4.
BrauerK.SendatzkiR.ProyerR. T. (2021). Testing the associations between dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at and romantic jealousy in couples: An APIM analysis. Journal of Personality, 89(5), 883–898.
5.
BurfordC. (1987). Humour of principals and its impact on teachers and the school. Journal of Educational Administration, 25(1), 29–54.
6.
BurnsM. E.PearsonJ. C. (2011). An exploration of family communication environment, everyday talk, and family satisfaction. Communication Studies, 62(2), 171–185.
7.
ButzerB.KuiperN. A. (2008). Humor use in romantic relationships: The effects of relationship satisfaction and pleasant versus conflict situations. The Journal of Psychology, 142(3), 245–260.
8.
CaspiA.HerbenerE. S.OzerD. J. (1992). Shared experiences and the similarity of personalities: A longitudinal study of married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 281–291.
9.
ChoJ. C.KnowlesE. D. (2013). I’m like you and you’re like me: Social projection and self-stereotyping both help explain self–other correspondence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 444–456.
10.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73–81.
11.
De KoningE.WeissR. L. (2002). The relational humor inventory: Functions of humor in close relationships. American Journal of Family Therapy, 30(1), 1–18.
12.
DowneyG.FreitasA. L.MichaelisB.KhouriH. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 545–560.
13.
EisenthalY.DrorG.RuppinE. (2006). Facial attractiveness: Beauty and the machine. Neural Computation, 18(1), 119–142.
14.
EndoY.HeineS. J.LehmanD. R. (2000). Culture and positive illusions in close relationships: How my relationships are better than yours. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), 1571–1586.
15.
FletcherG. J. (2015). Accuracy and bias of judgments in romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 292–297.
16.
FletcherG. J.KerrP. S. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 627–658.
17.
FordT. E.BoxerC. F.ArmstrongJ.EdelJ. R. (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159–170.
18.
FunkJ. L.RoggeR. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583.
19.
FurrM. R. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1267–1316.
20.
GonzalesS. M.MieropJ. (2004). Humor use and family satisfaction: A cross-cultural approach. Intercultural Communication Studies, 13, 125–138.
21.
GreengrossG. (2013). Humor and aging—A mini-review. Gerontology, 59(5), 448–453.
22.
GreengrossG. (2014). Male production of humor produced by sexually selected psychological adaptations. In Weekes-ShackelfordV. A.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 173–196). Springer.
23.
GreengrossG.MillerG. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence, 39(4), 188–192.
24.
GreengrossG.SilviaP. J.NusbaumE. C. (2020). Sex differences in humor production ability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 84, Article 103886.
25.
Gruber-BaldiniA. L.SchaieK. W.WillisS. L. (1995). Similarity in married couples: A longitudinal study of mental abilities and rigidity-flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 191–203.
26.
HallJ. A. (2013). Humor in long-term romantic relationships: The association of general humor styles and relationship-specific functions with relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication, 77(3), 272–292.
27.
HallJ. A. (2017). Humor in romantic relationships: A meta-analysis. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 306–322.
28.
HallJ. A.SerenoK. (2010). Offensive jokes: How do they impact long-term relationships?Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2010.016
29.
HallJ. A.TaylorS. E. (1976). When love is blind: Maintaining idealized images of one’s spouse. Human Relations, 29(8), 751–761.
30.
HeintzS. (2017). Putting a spotlight on daily humor behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with personality, subjective well-being, and humor styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 407–412.
31.
HeintzS. (2019). Do others judge my humor style as I do?European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(5), 625–632.
32.
HeintzS.RuchW. (2015). An examination of the convergence between the conceptualization and the measurement of humor styles: A study of the construct validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Humor, 28(4), 611–633.
33.
HeintzS.RuchW. (2016). Reply to Martin (2015): Why our conclusions hold. Humor, 29(1), 125–129.
34.
HumbadM. N.DonnellanM. B.IaconoW. G.McGueM.BurtS. A. (2013). Quantifying the association between personality similarity and marital adjustment using profile correlations: A cautionary tale. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(1), 97–106.
35.
JiangT.LiH.HouY. (2019). Cultural differences in humor perception, usage, and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 123.
36.
JovanovicV. (2011). Do humor styles matter in the relationship between personality and subjective well-being?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(5), 502–507.
37.
KennyD. A.AcitelliL. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 439–448.
38.
KeumB. T.Morales DixonK.KivlighanD. M.JrHillC. E.GelsoC. J. (2021). Do therapists improve in their ability to assess clients’ satisfaction? A truth and bias model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(5), 608–620.
39.
KuiperN. A.GrimshawM.LeiteC.KirshG. (2004). Humor is not always the best medicine: Specific components of sense of humor and psychological well-being. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 17, 135–168.
40.
LaneS. P.HennesE. P. (2018). Power struggles: Estimating sample size for multilevel relationships research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 7–31.
41.
LeeK.AshtonM. C.PozzebonJ. A.VisserB. A.BourdageJ. S.OgunfoworaB. (2009). Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well-acquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 460–472.
42.
LemayE. P.JrDudleyK. L. (2011). Caution: Fragile! Regulating the interpersonal security of chronically insecure partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 681–702.
43.
LundyD. E.TanJ.CunninghamM. R. (1998). Heterosexual romantic preferences: The importance of humor and physical attractiveness for different types of relationships. Personal Relationships, 5(3), 311–325.
44.
MalloyT. E.KennyD. A. (1986). The social relations model: An integrative method for personality research. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 199–225.
45.
MartinR. A.Puhlik-DorisP.LarsenG.GrayJ.WeirK. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75.
46.
McGeeE.ShevlinM. (2009). Effect of humor on interpersonal attraction and mate selection. The Journal of Psychology, 143(1), 67–77.
47.
Mesmer-MagnusJ.GlewD. J.ViswesvaranC. (2012). A meta-analysis of positive humor in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(2), 155–190.
48.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889–922.
49.
MorryM. M. (2005). Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings: A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(4), 561–584.
50.
MurrayS. L.BellaviaG. M.RoseP.GriffinD. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 126–147.
51.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.DoldermanD.GriffinD. W. (2000). What the motivated mind sees: Comparing friends’ perspectives to married partners’ views of each other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(6), 600–620.
52.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.BellaviaG. M.HolmesJ. G.KuscheA. G. (2002). When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 556–573.
53.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 480–497.
54.
RogersK. H.WoodD.FurrR. M. (2018). Assessment of similarity and self-other agreement in dyadic relationships: A guide to best practices. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 112–134.
55.
RyanK. M.KanjorskiJ. (1998). The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles, 38(9), 743–756.
56.
SciangulaA.MorryM. M. (2009). Self-esteem and perceived regard: How I see myself affects my relationship satisfaction. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 143–158.
57.
SnijdersT. A.KennyD. A. (1999). The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach. Personal Relationships, 6(4), 471–486.
58.
SolomonB. C.VazireS. (2014). You are so beautiful . . . to me: Seeing beyond biases and achieving accuracy in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 516–528.
59.
StiegerS.FormannA. K.BurgerC. (2011). Humor styles and their relationship to explicit and implicit self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 747–750.
60.
StogdillR. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 8(1), 26–43.
61.
WestT. V.KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378.
62.
WoodW. I.OldhamC. R.ReifmanA.NiehuisS. (2017). Accuracy and bias in newlywed spouses’ perceptions of each other’s personalities. Personal Relationships, 24(4), 886–901.
63.
ZivA.GadishO. (1989). Humor and marital satisfaction. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(6), 759–768.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
